DNA Train & Bill Gates

 

Arthur Caplan, Ph.D.,a bioethicist at Harvard (2005) espoused a

theoretical scenario regarding Bill Gates.

"Who needs Bill Gates? No, I don’t mean who needs a gazillionaire corporate titan, a man whose company, Microsoft, took in billions of dollars last year by controlling nearly all the software used to run nearly every computer on the planet.

No, I mean,  literally, who needs him?  If you could go back in time and stop the birth of the world’s most famous nerd, would you?

You probably answered my question with a "no.".......he is the father of a computer revolution that has brought much good to many people throughout the world. Add to that achievement his current generous philanthropic activities supporting some very worthy causes, such as vaccine research and a center for autism research in Seattle, and the case for having Bill with us becomes pretty persuasive.  What if I told you it’s possible that Gates has a medical condition that accounts, in part, for both his tremendous achievements and for his "nerdiness?" Gates is widely reported to display many personality traits characteristic of a condition known as Asperger’s syndrome.  Asperger’s is a mild version of autism, a more serious condition that renders many children unable to talk, be touched, communicate or socialize. While I certainly do not know if Gates has Asperger’s, his difficulties in social settings are nearly as legendary as his genius, so it's possible.  That said, if you had been Gates' potential mom or dad 50 years ago, what would you have done if you knew about his abilities and flaws before he was born?

Asperger’s is the least disabling form of autism and research is beginning to show that it may also account for the presence of some special capabilities in areas like mathematics, computer science and engineering. But the same genes may also create a person who is socially awkward, easily distracted, very introspective and in many ways withdrawn and solitary.

The reason I ask these questions is that there is a good chance we will soon have a genetic test for detecting the risk of autism in an embryo or fetus. The development of such a screening tool raises the possibility that parents might one day have the option of preventing the birth of a child with even a mild case of the disorder.

 

DNA. or desoxynucleic acid was postulated and proven over forty years ago. At that time it was heralded as the next penicillin of health care.

Millions, and perhaps billions of dollars (now worth much less) have been invested in learning more about the molecules of our primordial basis for reproduction.

Recently several high profile biomedical companies have begun to promote wide screening of individuals who appear to be healthy as a predictor for degenerative and/or chronic diseases. Is this technology ready for 'prime time'? Several question have arisen.  The state of California with a recent "cease and desist order"  decided it is not ready, under the present format proposed by the three companies who stand to make a fortune if this idea catches on with the public. (Affymetrix, Navigenics). Microsoft seeing a chance to capitalize offers "HealthVault" to store the data for future use by patients and health care providers in this prospective study. 

Will this testing be cost effective, and where is the evidence based "medicine" ??  Will health insurance companies reimburse for this lab test?

"The cost of genetic testing can range from under $100 to more than $2,000, depending on the nature and complexity of the test"

Genetic testing has proven it's worth in predictive pre-natal testing for hereditary chromosomal abnormalities such as trisomy 21, trisomy 18, cystic fibrosis, and other tests not related directly to genetic analysis have predictive value. (Tay-Sachs disease, neural tube defects)

 

A consortium of health care, technology and research leaders have joined forces in a first-of-its-kind research study to assess the behavioral impact of personal genetic testing on people who choose to receive such screenings to identify their potential
risk for developing certain diseases.

    Sponsored by Scripps Translational Science Institute (STSI), and the National Institutes of Health, ie, our tax dollars,  the study aims to find out if participating in personal genomic testing will improve health by motivating people to make positive lifestyle changes, such as exercising, eating healthy and quitting smoking, as well as decisions to seek further medical evaluation and preventive strategies. The study will offer genetic scans to up to 10,000  employees, family members and friends of the nonprofit Scripps Health system in San Diego and will assess changes in participants' behaviors over a 20-year period.

    Co-sponsors of the study include Navigenics Inc. of Redwood Shores, Calif.; Affymetrix of Santa Clara, Calif.; and Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Wash. Study participants age 18 and older can receive a scan of their genome and a detailed analysis of their genetic risk for more than 20 health conditions that may be changed by lifestyle, including diabetes, obesity, heart attack and some forms of cancer. Other companies such as 23andme will offer the range of tests (using a small sample of saliva) for $399.00 through  the internet ( secure)
  

"Genome scans give people considerable information about their DNA and risk of disease, yet questions have been raised if these tests are ready for widespread public use," said Eric J. Topol, M.D., director of STSI and principal investigator of the study. "Our study will prospectively evaluate the effect that state-of-the-art gene scans have on people's lifestyles, behaviors, diets and psyches."

    Affymetrix will scan each participant's genome and Navigenics(TM) will interpret the scan results and offer personalized guidance on steps to lessen the chances of negative health impact. This information will be available to participants on Navigenics' secure Web site. Each participant will be able to enter and store clinical and lifestyle information in an individual Microsoft HealthVault(TM) account, allowing the participant to manage his or her personal health information in one location and share it,
as desired, with health care providers or others they trust to help make more informed health care decisions. (ref: PR Newswire)

It's a brave new world out there!!!

The Train Station

Dr Val  www.getbetterhealth.com

Last night I had a chance to join Dr Anonymous on his world famous Thursday evening show. It was great to hook up with fellow bloggers, Dr A, Dr. Val, Dr Rob and many others in the health train station.

For those of you who have not heard, Dr Val has changed 'networks'. Her new blog, which I call  'soft & fluffy' , address is www.getbetterhealth.com   .

Dr Val  has interview posts from Mike Huckabee, Grant Hill, Maria Menounos, Bob Schieffer,Phylicia Rashad, and Dr.

Richard Carmona.

Here is your chance to learn from "Bones" of Star Trek fame. It seems he had troubles with reimbursements as well.

As usual Dr. Val shows her creative flare....this is going to be a great blog and web site...Watch out Oprah and The View..

Congratulations to Dr. Val!!!!  You are no longer homeless.

Dr. L

Health Train Calclulator

Quote of the day:

Reading is to the mind what exercise is to the body. - Sir Richard Steele

************************************************

Located at number 92 in the list of the most popular Health2.0 blogs is 'Stayin Alive'  Clicking on this link takes you to the blog, and in the posting today (October 9,2008) is a link which takes you to the "Health and Education Calculator" .  The web site is self-explanatory. It's a fun thing to tinker around with.

Wealth Train Express

I'll take a right hand turn here (not politically) to share with the readers....we are in the wrong profession.

Some new definitions in the world of business. This guy's blog was bought for  15 million buckaroos!

Revised Financial Terminology for 2008

Posted in Banking News by Johns Wu
October 8, 2008 09:34 AM - 15 Comments

Hat tip to The Big Picture for posting up this bit of Wednesday humor.

CEO –Chief Embezzlement Officer.

CFO– Corporate Fraud Officer.

BULL MARKET — A random market movement causing an investor to mistake himself for a financial genius.

BEAR MARKET — A 6 to 18 month period when the kids get no allowance, the wife gets no jewelry, and the husband gets no sex.

VALUE INVESTING — The art of buying low and selling lower.

P/E RATIO — The percentage of investors wetting their pants as the market keeps crashing.

BROKER — What my broker has made me.

STANDARD & POOR — Your life in a nutshell.

STOCK ANALYST — Idiot who just downgraded your stock.

STOCK SPLIT — When your ex-wife and her lawyer split your assets equally between themselves.

FINANCIAL PLANNER — A guy whose phone has been disconnected.

MARKET CORRECTION — The day after you buy stocks.

CASH FLOW — The movement your money makes as it disappears down the toilet.

YAHOO — What you yell after selling it to some poor sucker for $240 per share.

WINDOWS — What you jump out of when you’re the sucker who bought Yahoo @ $240 per share.

INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR — Past year investor who’s now locked up in a nuthouse.

PROFIT — An archaic word no longer in use.

I know, I know, we still get our jollies out of helping these people.

Health Train addendum

It seems that no sooner do I ask a question, that the answer appears on other blogs. Thank you Matt Holt, and others.

 

 

Candleglance provides some stellar graphics. More comments later.

Answers to the Health Train Questions

Edwin and Kevin, I have found the answer to my questions about symptoms at the  E.D.

From the WSJ

The grim economy and quaking stock market are driving masters of the financial universe to seek professional help for anxiety, and eroding sense of identity or tips on how to deal with angry clients, the Boston Globe reports.

Therapists are seeing an 15% to 20% uptick in business from affluent clients around Boston, psychologist Jim Grubman told the Globe.

The financial crisis bruises the psyches of the wealthiest in particular because their sense of self can be so focused on making money, therapists say.

“It’s something that I call identity dissolution, their sense of identity dissolves,” Dennis Pearne, another Massachusetts psychologist, told the Globe. “The primary way they defined themselves and who they were and their values - what they can and can’t do in this world - disintegrates.”

In counseling, the rich (or formerly rich) may need to learn that who they are is more than raw purchasing power. Therapy may explore the idea of a different career or, alternatively, how to renew the patient’s motivation to compete again in the market. Grrrrr.

Kick your Apps off the Health Train

I don't know about you, but I have heard, written, and seen about enough of gloom, doom, and problems.  I turn our attention to some fun stuff.

Today we are offering a number of innovative applications to benefit you and your patients.

First, I would like to invite the readers to join an internet site which is a unique central control for all your social networking sites. For those of you who are of an entrepenurial bent, or those who have internet savy and web sites, this is a site with a myriad of tools to promote your web site and integrate it into multiple social networking sites. Kickapps is a user friendly site offering multiple venues for publicizing  your enterprise.  Some of the companies that are represented include: National media, Local media, Blogs, Magazines,Newspapers,Lifestyle,Not for Profit,League and Associates, Community Associations, Local and National Televison, Local and National Radio, NPR.....and more.  There is even a site that will take you to Concierge Medicine.

The site is supported by advertising, and a host of interesting links.  There are multiple tutorials for idiots like me. Exploring this site may give you ideas for your interests. My site gmlevinmd123 is there in it's infancy.  See you there at Kickapps

Warning, this is an unabashedly commercial marketing site.  I make no claims regarding it's veracity and I have no financial interests in the site, nor any of it's participants, other than my own link.

Health Train Collision

Harry Truman

"I never did give them hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was hell."

************************************************

The past two weeks have hammered

all segments of the economy, from the housing markets, banking institutions, small and large businesses, and soon into healthcare.  Unless the credit markets resume functioning very soon we will witness payless paydays in provider groups, elimination of health information technology projects and the abrupt decrease in adoption of EMRs.  The Feds have shot themselves in the foot, quite nicely.

AIG crashed several weeks ago, and we have heard nada from health insurers, their reserves, nor the state of their investments in the market and/or real estate. I am naturally suspicious and it has been eerily quiet from those corners.

Ignoring Crisis has a price  (from the New York Times)

After 14 months of crisis, the federal government — meaning you and me — has put serious money on the line. As a point of comparison, the entire annual federal budget is about $3 trillion.

Despite everything, the biggest fiscal problem remains, far and away, health care. Based on the rate that medical spending has been rising, the Congressional Budget Office forecasts that Medicare and Medicaid will take up 10 percent of G.D.P. within two decades, up from about 4 percent now. In today’s terms, that would be the equivalent of adding at least $900 billion to the deficit every single year, in perpetuity. It makes the cost of the bailouts look like a rounding error.

When it comes to health care, we have a situation that is blatantly unsustainable. With the right choices, we can prevent that. But so far, we instead seem to be hoping that the situation will magically resolve itself, which is a recipe for big problems and perhaps even a crisis.  Will health care bomb out?

Let’s see. That doesn’t sound familiar, does it?

Health Train Track to Reform

Richard Reece, MD in his Medinnovation blog points out that the road to reform is mostly uphill.....Does the road wind up-hill all the way? Yes, to the very end.

“Each of the key players is sharply edged, high-earning physicians, the over-bedded hospital sector, employers squeezed by rapid rising benefit costs, inefficient private health insurance companies, highly profitable pharmaceutical and medical supply companies, and, finally, the public who wants more and better care but doesn’t want to pay for it.”
Sound familiar? It should, for satisfying these stakeholders block the road to health reform today. The road to universal coverage is as uphill as it has ever been.

 

*****************************************************

Michael L. Millenson, president of Health Quality Advisors LLC in Highland Park, IL, is the author of the critically acclaimed book, Demanding Medical Excellence: Doctors and Accountability in the Information Age.  In the Huffington Post today (a not unbiased publication. Millenson gives his opinion of MCain's plan for health reform

***************************************************

THCB has an article authored by Maggie Mahar (Maggie Mahar is an award winning journalist and author. A frequent contributor to THCB, she is fellow at the Century Foundation and the author of the increasingly influential HealthBeat blog, one of our favorite health care reads, where this piece first appeared.) She begins her analysis.........

"I have to admit I often have found the language of health care “rights” off-putting.  Yet the idea of health care as a “right” is usually pitted against the idea of health care as a “privilege.” Given that choice, I’ll circle “right” every time."

************************************************

The Wall Street Journal  sums up McCain vs. Obama,

McCain said:

I think it’s a responsibility, in this respect, in that we should have available and affordable health care to every American citizen, to every family member. … But government mandates I — I’m always a little nervous about. But it is certainly my responsibili

Obama said:

I think it should be a right for every American. … for my mother to die of cancer at the age of 53 and have to spend the last months of her life in the hospital room arguing with insurance companies because they’re saying that this may be a pre-existing condition and they don’t have to pay her treatment, there’s something fundamentally wrong about that.

The WSJ blog leaves us with this question,

Health Blog Question of the Day: What do you say? Is health care in America a privilege, a right, or a responsibility?

Health Train Derailed

Last night’s debate was rather lackluster and uninspiring. Neither of the candidates revealed themselves to be ‘leaders’ and proponents for a glowing American rebound and future. Neither of them painted a picture of creative thought. Rather it was more like a cabinet meeting of officials discussing nickel-dime instructions on how to rescue our country from decline and mediocrity.

McCain’ plan for health reform made universal payer look highly desirable. He totally ignored the issues of escalating health care cost, the uninsured and underinsured.

He ignored public health, children’s health, and geriatric health and no mention about Medicare reform. There was no mention of the burdens of unnecessary bureaucracy and redundant process.

The idea of removing employers from the equation is a double edged sword. The most negative thing about is that many people would not obtain health insurance if it is not a benefit. Who would pick up the vacuum? The tax credit is inadequate and adds another level of complexity, another attempt to manipulate citizen behavior with more tax codes. It does not address the unemployed, either acutely or chronically. In our present system, employers also analyze health insurance plans and offer a menu of plans analyzed by human resources. Would individuals be able to navigate this morass? On the other hand it removes the employer as a negotiating agent in the marketing war of insurers. Individuals would negotiate directly with the insurers. This would change the playing field.

The campaign has drifted away from ‘the measure of the man’. I tend to like some of Obama’s ideas, but am very uncomfortable with the measure of him. Yes, he did some worthwhile work in Chicago with community development, but where does that work leave the ‘rest of us’.

As in healthcare, the economic rescue plan very much depends on details. Without careful thought and advice from those in the system it will be doomed to failure.

In addition to these factors, the financial world seems to have lost all sense fiduciary responsibility, captivated by profit, greed, and golden parachutes. Many of these ‘captains of industry’ should be indicted for fraud and prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

I and many of my colleagues feel a deep sense of resentment when the financial industry can function in a manner that we cannot. If my medical practice acted in this manner, my doors would be closed. I look at Washington Mutual, Wachovia, and others who have been rescued (for the time being) with open doors, doing business as usual. I think their doors should be shuttered. FDIC can insure the depositors, but these banks should no longer be operating. The employees can work for other financial institutions. However to allow them to keep operating under the same name is a travesty of unbelievable proportions.

It seems harsh, but those who lose money will be much more attentive to the banks with which they do business. Obviously leaving this up to regulators who do not regulate has not worked.

If you have made it down to this point in my diatribe, I will close with the following.

Obviously you and I who have practiced in the system for say 5,10,20 years or more no nothing about healthcare, nor how to reform it (at least that is how the politicians, pundits, and allied personel look at it).

(from Distractible Mind..thanks)

I am no expert.....that is woefullly apparent from comments I have received from others.  I will pontificate in other areas. Healthcare is in the ICU, intubated, and without  ADVANCE DIRECTIVES. with no means of ''pulling the plug".

Medical futility.
Who has the power to decide?

Health Train-----I'll catch the next one.

I  am not going to watch tonite's debate. I know all I need to know. In fact I am not going to listen or watch anymore political debates.  There seems to be a total lack of common sense. My criteria for choosing our next President lies in the measure of the candidates.  Listen to Senator Tom Coburn from Oklahoma.

Not their academic prowess

Not their marital history....unless it borders on the promiscuous at this time

Not their race or sex

Not their promises

Not their idea of  health care reform

Not their solution for the economic crisis.

I will not base it upon slick oratory, charisma, and/or rhetoric.

 

I will base it upon their fundamental belief in all the citizens of the United States.

I will base it upon who paid for their education, and fundamental beliefs in the constitution.

I will base it upon who they 'hang out with'.

 

(Photoshop mash up)

I will base it upon to whom they are loyal.

I will base  it upon their life demonstration to America and thier underlying belief system.

 

 

Health Train Overhaul

Quote of the day:

People that are really very weird can get into sensitive positions and have a tremendous impact on history. - Dan Quayle

*****************************************************

You can forget about major healthcare reform this election cycle. Our current and future elected leaders are hard pressed to correct the financial morass that has developed.  The media is misleading all of us when it places blame on the sub-prime mortgage market.  To hear responsible officials blame this on giving mortgages to people that should not have a mortgage is a blatant lie and misrepresentation of the facts. One of America's ideals has everyone should be able to buy a home. a chicken in every pot and a  car or two in the garage. Perhaps that was true in the 50s when the average home in suburbia was about 19,000-25,000 dollars. This is largely untrue now with average homes costing 250,00 dollars or more in a market where the dollar is almost worthless compared to it's value back then. The cost of gas was about 19-25 cents per gallon.  A MacDonald's burger was 19 cents.

 

Healthcare will muddle along for the time being, unless we see large hospitals or systems threatened with bankruptcy or failure and then they will be bailed out if it affects millions of people.  Don't look for relief for the piddling masses of physicians, and primary care providers. 

You don't need a pile or ream of statistics to analyze our current situation.  Just look at your accounts receivable, and your check book balances.

In fact as William Brody states in the San Francisco Chronicle 

In case you missed it, Great Britain, in response to prolonged complaints from tourists, has decided to move its traffic from the left side of the road to the right, the same way we drive in the United States. But not all traffic. After taxi and truck drivers protested the cost of moving their steering wheels, a compromise was worked out. Cars will drive on the right and commercial vehicles on the left.

They call this the American Medicine Plan.

None of that is true, of course. I offer this nightmarish fantasy to make the point that the United States has the world's only health care system where everyone plays by his or her own rulebook.

In fact, there is no American health care system. You can talk about the British Medical Service or the German medical system or the Canadian national health plan. But when you describe American health care, there is no one system you can talk about. Medicare is different from Medicaid is different from private insurance is different from no insurance.

Individuals in these different situations have different medical experiences - and often different health outcomes.  And for this mess, we Americans shell out $2.2 trillion a year, up from $75 billion just 38 years ago."

What troubles me, however, is that whenever Washington tries to overhaul something that involves a large universe of interest groups, it usually makes things not simpler, but more complex. And complexity is already one of the very worst aspects of American health care.

Has anyone been to a hospital for a procedure and not been confounded by the billing process that followed? No wonder hospitals are repeatedly asked, "Do you go out of your way to hire complete idiots for your billing office?"

In fact, just the opposite is true. Hospitals try their best to hire good people and spend a lot of time training them. But the outcomes are usually abysmal because every insurance plan has different rules, different eligibilities and different coding systems.

Not so very long ago, hospitals dealt with only a small number of organizations that paid for medical care. There was Medicare and Medicaid, Blue Cross/Blue Shield and a handful of private insurers. Recently, I asked my chief financial officer how many payers we deal with today. The number shocked even me. He said Johns Hopkins Hospital has to bill more than 700 different payers and insurers.

They are HMOs, PPOs, MCOs, IPAs and an alphabet soup of other organizations. Each one has its own set of rules for what services are covered, the level of reimbursement and the kinds of documentation and pre-approval required. It is an administrative nightmare.

This inefficiency costs patients tens of billions of dollars each year. Billing, collection and payment administration conservatively represent 20 percent of that $2.2 trillion health-care bill.

When Washington addresses health care reform, therefore, it needs to treat complexity as one of the major symptoms.

How? I don't pretend to have all the answers, but some points are clear. Start with a common format - a national standard for billing and coding - that all payers and providers can use to reduce costs and burdens and make medical bills understandable to patients.

The Barracuda Express

photo source: Bully Pulpit

Sarah Palin, the quintissential girl next door,tomboy, beauty queen, fish, Annie  Oakley, David & Goliath, Esther,...is here in Southern California. Because I am an ophthalmologist I am most strongly attracted by her eye wear...(LASIK SURGEONS, stay away from my girl) and don't even think about using her photo for a testimonial to your "greatness" as a lasik surgeon), a surefire way to tank your practice.

(Marry me, Sarah)

Like most Democrats and Republicans alike, I measure Sarah  Palin by what I observe on the tube.  Some of us are looking for the 'savior' to save us from what is surely a big mess. No fancy words are needed here, and perhaps this is why and what Sarah is all about.  She is not, and has not been a part of the problem  in the lower 49 states.  Give us energy....she has the energy in more ways than one.  We can't measure her by her quantum of expertise in foreign affairs, economics, good old boy networking,the altitude of her formal education,nor her accomplishments in social justice. (does Alaska have a slum, ghetto, or downtrodden masses?  Perhaps the native Innuit's serve that role in Alaska....but we never hear much about them.

Does Alaska have to deal with droves of illegal aliens crossing the frozen tundra in search of work?  Perhaps now that the drill, drill, drill proponents have there way there will be a need for 'cheap labor' that Americans don't want to do'...(we had better start building the bridge across the Bering Strait) 

The last great invasion into Alaska dates back tens of thousands of years when North America was populated by the Asian throngs.

Today I will measure her.  I will be at her speech in the Home Depot Center in Carson, CA , perhaps chosen, by no accident since it is the home of the Los Angeles Galaxy Soccer team.

(close to Los Angeles) to listen, observe, smell, and feel the 'energy' and it's effect on the audience.....a much more accurate assessment than the biased media reports of the cable network channels, who espouse the convictions of their owners.

On Monday I'll be bok (I'm from Caleeforneea) to espouse my humble opinion and return to health care issues.