The Revolution in Magazine Processes "How not to fall behind in an era when everything you think you know might be wrong."

The title could have just as well read

The Revolution 

in 

Health Processes

Conventional print magazines, newspapers have weathered a sea-change in their business model.
And so has medicine and health process.

Health care financing, and administration also are struggling to change even as our current medical system is overwhelmed with increased expenses.  The similarity between magazine process and health process are remarkably alike.

Prominent news publishers, such as the Washington Post, New York Times and many others went out of business at the same time re-inventing their 'product' in a more efficient manner.  In some cases ownership shifted quietly behind the scenes. There were major reductions in staff, overhead and outright elimination of tasks that served no purpose or had been replaced by digitalizing the industry.

Even as this is occurring health organizations are burdened with daily organizations while being mandated by government, CMS, the Affordable Care Act, Insurers, and expansion of new covered benefits such as remote monitoring, telehealth and mobile health care.  The uptick in  expenditures for health IT is overwhelming many, both large and small.  There is no room for error. During the past five years some large institutions spent millions of dollars to purchase EHRs only to find they could not perform as advertised. Providers, and hospitals did not know or have experience in systems that were new and untested in a real world setting.

Health care operated mostly on a cash basis until the birth of managed care, capitation, and other obtuse forms of risk management.  In health affairs risk management used to have to do with risk of disease and/or treatments. Insurance companies were required to have an actuarial basis for setting premium rates against history of their insured disease risks.

Today this risk is carried not just by the insurance company, it has been shifted to hospitals and providers. Other calculations are being considered such as quality of outcomes, measured by re-admission rates to the hospital. The latest in the quirky world of health high finance is the 'accountable care organization. (ACO).

The name was coined by Elliott Fisher as a philosophical term during it's germination period.  Theoretically the organization that saves the most gets a 'kickback' a larger reward incentive than the rest of the providers/hospitals.

The health care company of 2005 is gone. its processes, procedures and priorities would be nearly unrecognizable today. In fact, the medical practice that existed in 2010 is gone too. In a period of accelerated transformation, nothing is more striking than the scope—and pace—of change in the processes through which these companies engage their customers (patients)  The very terms physician and patient devolved into provider and consumer. Physicians are no longer generalists or specialists they are primary care providers. It’s not just peripheral or incremental change, either. What the industry is going through in 2015 is a revolution in processes. In advertising, content creation, marketing, back-office functions and everything in between, what was done just a few years ago has been rendered obsolete, as new ways to interact with and serve stakeholders push the old ways into the trash bin. 

What’s changed is that technology is transforming every single phase of the business. It’s ubiquitous. It’s impacting the business on a wholesale level.”  It’s a new world of “VUCA,” says Lenny Izzo, group president of legal media at ALM. “That’s an acronym for Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity and Ambiguity. It’s an old military term

Providers and hospitals have become 'punch-drunk' much like boxers and football players suffer from TBD or traumatic brain disorder.

Uncertainty comes in the form of new competitors. It comes with the decline in traditional branding-based display advertising, and the rise of new formats like cost-per-lead sales and programmatic advertising. Complexity comes in the form of tying together new expensive technologies that cross email, web, billing, production, ad-management, and content creation. Ambiguity comes in the form of not having the expertise to evaluate expensive new systems, and sometimes not knowing the right KPIs. Volatility? How about not knowing whether a new software system that cost $1 million will be relevant in 18 months?

This report is an on-the-ground look at process change in magazine media companies and how it’s affecting, well, nearly everything, from organizational structure and staffing needs, to assumptions about efficiency and newly essential skillsets. We’ll look at overall philosophies and approaches, and then explore, mainly through case studies, what publishing companies and executives are actually doing. 

Radical changes in process are driven by several things, of course. But mostly, it’s a function of two things: emerging technologies that enable new methods of serving markets, and a quest within companies for efficiency driven by economic necessity.

The revolution in health is not just in health IT, it includes changes in medical group administration, payment reform, relationships between providers, hospitals and providers, referral patterns and a new dynamic between regulators, licensing boards and providers of health care.

Interestingly, for health provider and magazine publishers, there’s a significant paradox in process change. Because the business model is in a seemingly permanent state of flux, and because technologies become obsolete so quickly, both types of companies find themselves betting huge amounts of money on unproven ideas. “Maybe the paradox of process is that you’re forced to be hyper-efficient in the things you understand, to finance what you hope is our future,” 

Note: Much of this article has been taken word for word from anaticle found on FOLIO  an internet magazine about the publishing business. It was a simple task to substitute health for magazine or publishers.. A true example of 'convergence'

HTE DIGEST Vol 1 No 2

HTE Health Train Express is Celebrating 10 years of publishing on the internet. Throughout this month we will publish articles from the past ten years.

JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) study claims low value care cost Medicare $8.5 B

A substantial number of Medicare Beneficiaries receive low value medical care. Several criteria were used to measure low value care. Medicare spent $8.5 billion, or $310 per beneficiary, on services detected by the study's more sensitive measures of low-value care, while spending on low-value services with more specific definitions totaled $1.9 billion, or $71 per beneficiary.

That accounted for 0.6 percent to 2.7 percent of overall spending, depending on the measures' level of sensitivity. While representing "modest proportions" of total Medicare spending, the researchers note the findings suggest widespread overuse of unnecessary treatments. JAMA Study  KHN Study

SPOTLIGHT ON... First 2015 rate filings show premium hikes

Virginia is first state to release rate proposals for 2015. Premium rates will rise 3.3% (KFHP), 8.5% (Wellpoint Anthem). to accomodate poorer health of many new members likely to boost their health care utilization.

Aetna: Bumpy road ahead for ACOs

Webinar events  Mark Your Calendars:  A collection of free webinars of timely subjects

> Next-Generation Subrogation Solutions - Wednesday, June 4, 2014, 12pmET / 11amCT / 9amPT

> Healthcare's new entrants: Who will be healthcare's Amazon.com? - Wednesday, June 3rd, 11am ET / 8am PT

> New Rx Savings Strategies for Payers - SPONSORED BY: Elsevier

> The Growing Challenge of Medical Identity Theft - Thursday, June 5, 2014 | 1pm ET, 11am PT

> The Internet of Things: How connected devices put data in your hands - Thursday, June 12th, 1pm ET / 10am PT

> Developing for the Internet of Things: Challenges and Opportunities - Wednesday, June 18th, 2pm ET

> Boosting physician adoption of CPOE to maximize its benefits - Wednesday, June 25th, 2pm ET/ 11am PT

Better MLR compliance reduces consumer rebates

Insurers issued about $513 million in rebates for 2012 under the medical-loss ratio requirement, according to a Commonwealth Fund report released Tuesday. That's half of the amount paid in 2011, showing greater compliance by insurers with the Affordable Care Act's MLR rule.  Commonwealth Fund announcement and study (.pdf)

CMS decided to increase the Medicare Advantage payment rate by 0.4 percent after it proposed in February to lower rates for plans,  Despite the reversal, some insurers like Aetna and Humana have still predicted Medicare Advantage payments will drop by as much as 4 percent.

Health IT News:

> Within two decades, Google might dominate the medical technology industry as the company currently spends $8 billion a year on research. Article

Shortage of Health IT Professionals Imperils Health Care Reform…

During the past ten years  adoption of EHR, HDX, and Hospital EHRs created a tsunami of demand for experienced IT professionals.  Despite funding for training of HIT personel via the HITECH ACT ongoing demand has created a shortage, impacting EHR installations, and Health Care Reform.  Much of Health Care Reform requires integration of data silos and data analytics

Is Meaningful Use is On the Ropes?

Controversy and disagreement continues in regard to Federal mandates for inclusion of Meaningful use standards for electronic health records. Meaningful use was designed to guide transition to EHRs that would exchange data, increase patient involvement, and allow data collection for analysis.  Providers are mandated to either modify their present EHR or completely replace their software.  This comes at a time when there are many competing increases in bureaucracy, planned adoption of the ICD-10 diagnosis tables.  Providers have said that the definition of Meaningful Use by HHS is not the same as meaningful use by providers.  EHRs continue to be inconsistent, not user friendly, nor intuitive.

Small Data

Health care and health reform are being influenced by seemingly unrelated spheres of influence. Many industries are effected by these same interactions in banking, transportation, defense, technology, basic science, education and government.

The age in which we live is both exciting and terrifying. Now that I am a septagenerian I see it is both. And somehow we will survive, grow stronger and thrive.

The catalyst is largely information technology and cyber technology, whether it is functions for gathering data, analytics,pseudo artificial intelligence, or robotics.  All of it is shaped by bits and bytes.  Even the basic materials of the integrated circuit and computer microprocessors will undergo basic changes perhaps away from silicon to carbon or even biological compounds such as the building blocks of DNA, nucleic acids.

Rather than having a simple bit or byte, nucleic acids as we know them, offer 4 different subunits that form a lexicon for building proteins from amino acids.

Big Data is often quoted in health care for analytics, for biological and research discoveries.

We in health care are now being continuously bombarded about the essentiality of gathering more and more information. Our government is underwriting some of the costs and also placing a large burden upon not only physicians but all providers, and hospitals to enter health data into the IT infrastrucure for some future use, some of which is still not defined, and some which is truly unproven.  Despite this billions of dollars have been and will be spent on this endeavor.

There have been some precautionary notes offered from other sectors:

Viewpoint: Why your company should NOT use “Big Data”

The latest trend is “Big Data”. The original concept of Big Data was the concept of using all of the information a company collect that was being thrown away due to costs and capacity constraints. With the rapidly declining cost of storage and retrieval, combined with machine learning, we should be able to find insights in all that ‘garbage data’ and use it to make better decisions in the core business. At least that’s the theory. As far as the basic theory goes it’s all true, but it’s not the full story.

Like a lot of trends, the drive to mastering Big Data has gone a little overboard. Google searches for the term “Big Data” has grown from practically nothing in 2010 to almost 200,000 searches a month by the end of 2013

It has become so ingrained in company cultures that to say you don’t want to use Big Data is a bit like saying you are against data-driven decision making. It would be career suicide to say Big Data is a waste of company time and resources.

The graph below depicts the exponential growth of big data over time.

The details can be found at the original article on ViewPoint

ObamaCare is the Central Battle over the future Direction of our Country.

Richard Reece MD who blogs at Medinnovation has some profound quotes from Thornton Wilder. From it derives the title of this article. Thorton Wilder,  a quintessential American writer, the author of The Bridge of Saint Luis Rey, Our Town, The Skin of Our Teeth,  and the inspiration of Hello Dolly !.  

Some of you will disagree with our view of the Affordable Care Act.

Wilder was a true patriot – a believer that America had created the most dynamic,  creative,  individualistic, and freedom-loving nation on earth.   

ObamaCare is the central battle over the future direction of our country. It cannot stand. It is a looming disaster for patients- especially seniors- for our economy and for the future of health care in America. It will lead to rationing and government control over health are decisions. The quality of care will decline. Medical progress will slow. And the resulting third-rate health care system will likey bankrupt our country.  The federal government is already racing toward a budgetary train wreck, and ObamaCare will only speed us down the tracks.”

Fortunately ObamaCare as it now is written will self-destruct and in the next five years the American Culture will de-construct it.

      Paul Rosenberg in FreemansPerspective.com  in a blog post entitled “Why ObamaCare Will Not Conquer American Culture,” November 1, 2013, in which he says,”Americans expect to choose whenever they want.. Americans expect choices; it is built for individual changes, not collective changes.  This is the DNA of the culture, and no matter what political controlling th liberal ruleship, the culture will simply not fall.

Grace-Marie Turner, James Capretta, Thomas Miller, and Robert Moffitt,  Why ObamaCare is Wrong for America: How the New Health Care Law Drives up Costs, Puts Government in Charge of Your Decisions, and Threatens Your Constitutional Rights (Broadside, a Harper Collins Imprint, 2011) who say, “The passage of ObamaCare was deeply polarizing. Never before had Congress passed - and the president signed into law – such sweeping legislation that was so strongly opposed by so many Americans."  

author:

Physicians in particular with our ethic of privacy and one on one relationships with our patients will not be misled by this plan which does not justify the means toward an end. We all are adamant about an equitable health care for all.  But this is not the way.

Take heart my colleagues.....the deconstruction will take place by the very people who put it together.....or they will be gone......voted out of office.

Survey on the Affordable Care Act

Following the botched rollout of the affordable care act, people are dazed (perhaps a better term would be "shock and awed' by the limp and incompetent rush to open the exchange on time rather than do  it right the first time.  Having to do it  over must have cost big time !

The good news for those of us who see the ACA as a mis-step toward uniform health care (note I did not call it Universal Health Care.   An inadequate and poorly constructed Universal Payer Plan is not necessarily uniform.

The very public event has opened the door for much discussion and now the time is ripe for changing the plan to something much better, less expensive and equitable, not designed to redistribute wealth. That is not what health care is about.  Obama's plan is deceitful in most ways..  The only redistribution of wealth would be to insurers, big  pharma, and the U.S. government at taxpayer expense.

Freedom Works has just released a survey that you should look at and participate.  This is your chance to participate with new ideas.

Freedom Works is an organization now intent upon  health reform and maintaining the underlying freedoms we as all Americans cherish.

How will Freedom Works support our goals for health reform? Freedom Works not only is interested in health care, it also  works across a wide variety of niches with a consistent underlying standard based on our most fundamental beliefs of freedom and constitutional law.

An email arrived in my inbox from Freedom Works that i would share with all my readers, providers, patients, employees of our health system and leaders in Congress.

This is your chance to weigh in on improving the Accountable Care Act.  Take the Survey constructed by Freedom Works.

Looking Back at 2013

This report is somewhat late due to last minute projects at the end of 2013 and the confusion about the individual mandate, the botched launching of health benefit exchanges and some other unexpected tasks

We reviewed the 'best"  Health Train Express posts of 2013 as measured by the number of comments and our analytics.

IRS VIOLATES HIPAA FACES LAWSUIT BY A "J Holiday Message for Health and Wellness WHY AREN'T DOCTORS INVOLVED IN HEALT Does Obama really want the Affordable Care Act Covered California What They Said Before the Train Wreck: The To Sebelius will be a no-show at Obamacare hearing The Beginning or The End to the Affordable Care Act There were many more 'favorites".  The highest number of page views was in the category of the Affordable Care Act. This was to be expected, given the high ranking of the ACA for search engines. Visit the sites on Health Train Express for many more interesting topics. Health Train Express has archived our posts dating back to 2005.  The focus of posts has changed over the  years, and reveals the dynamism of health care and reform.

Happy New Year .... NOT for Health Reform

Should we be content that we made it through 2013, it seems we always do, no matter what happpens.  Now is the time to become accountable and assertive to determine our future health care.

Many aspects come together to produce 'the perfect storm'.  This storm is not necessarily a destructive one. It has set off an early warning signal for our country that we must be cautious of how we reform our health system.

Nevertheless our health system is in shambles, further delays in revising it, or continuing on with the ACA will lead to a train wreck.

Obamacare is focused on health insurance, with caveats, rewards, and penalties.. Neither patients or providers were the center of the reform.  The  item that did serve patients was solving the pre-existing conditions as a reason  for denying coverage,and eliminating the cap on coverage.

Health Reform will not take place in isolation or in one swoop,  and despite the ACA we will not yet have a functioning plan, nor will we if we continue with the present legislation.

Health Train Express receives a daily stream of analysis and recommendations for future modification to our system.  Neither hype, grandiosity, political motives nor slick marketing by 'celebrities' is going to 'fix' our system.

The good news is that we do have the finest scientific and technical resources already at our beck and call. All of this is available, it's a question of distribution, and we can compare it to supply line  management. We do not need a "Manhattan Project" to invent a new technology.  We already possess it. Perhaps this is an oversimplification, however many have compared our system to other industries, such as the airline business, the banking business and shipping businesses. No one model correctly addresses health financing.

There are aspects, accessibility, funding, prevention, and correcting the huge cost disparites and how to correct the burden for deficits & reimbursements.

Although  the ACA passed in 2010, we are more than three years down the road,  and most of the ACA has not occurred.  Further delays will occur now due to the inability to implement the first stages and mandates.  What has happened is the insurance companies have been sent into disarray, and have been asked already to double back.

The extent of increases in implementation cost will accelerate further and even cancel whatever cost reductions are predicted by the ACA.   Some studies have already demonstrated this fact.

Fortunately, the disagreements and controversy have focused attention on our health system for many who have been  passive and willing to accept the system for what it is. Each  year we witness a steady increase in premiums, increasing deductibles, increasing co-payments and decreasing reimbursements. We have mistakenly used tax law to minimize or maximize gains from insurance coverage with MSPs, HSAs, and now face a myriad of new, unproven schemes such as Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) predicted to decrease cost and improve quality.

It is a highly complex equation, involving some market economics, and a system of reimbursement that defies logic.  For some time the financing has been approached as a point of service transaction(POS) with creative financing such as capitation, some tax credits, and deductions. A portion of the state's public social service system is deemed 'free care' although it is not.

There are many 'misnomers' , such as 'usual and customary charges', pre-paid rates, adjustments, and cash deductions, Insurance companies have based their rates and policies upon algorithms and actuarial analysis, and a 'fudge factor' for unpredictability.

Many have sad, health care is a right, based upon aspects of the constitution in regard to the pursuit of happiness and freedom.  Although the word health does not appear in the  constitution, health can be construed to be a part of pursuing........life and happiness.

Others state that health care is not a right and not everyone should have health coverage, with a bit of 'they don't deserve it.  Neither truly can be legitimized by such a callous attitude.

What we need is a steady hand on the system that will deal equitably and with imperturbability the illnesses of human life and the equal ability to cope with it.

Freedom Works is an organization now intent upon  health reform and maintaining the underlying freedoms we as all Americans cherish.

How will Freedom Works support our goals for health reform? Freedom Works not only is interested in health care, it also  works across a wide variety of niches with a consistent underlying standard based on our most fundamental beliefs of freedom and constitutional law.

An email arrived in my inbox from Freedom Works that i would share with all my readers, providers, patients, employees of our health system and leaders in Congress.

This is your chance to weigh in on improving the Accountable Care Act.  Take the Survey constructed by Freedom Works.

The United States of Affordable Care (Act)

Health Care Financing would seem to be a long way off from the patient waiting to see their physician.

In today's world the quantitiy and qualitiy of care depends very much upon the type of health insurance the patient has to use.   The care may be far different according to region, or state.

The term 'public health ' is a misnomer. The public health system is not accessible to all people for a number of reasons.  Many perceive public health as inferior to the 'private system of health care", and only would access a center if there were no other option. Many current users of public health and/or Federally Qualified Health Centers would not even know how to access ' private care'. Learn more about them here and here and  here.  I particularly like the last one. No one home --

The resource cannot be found.

If you are successful, the rules are as long as the Affordable Care Act.

A new term which may be unfamiliar to most providers and/or patients is the "Federally Qualified Health  Centers".  These centers are found more commonly in areas of low economic assets and amongst many people who fall in the range of the Federal Poverly Level (FPL).  And here are the numbers which are both unrealistic at the lower end and even more unbelievable at the top end.

• $11,490 to $45,960 for individuals
• $15,510 to $62,040 for a family of 2
• $19,530 to $78,120 for a family of 3
• $23,550 to $94,200 for a family of 4
• $27,570 to $110,280 for a family of 5
• $31,590 to $126,360 for a family of 6
• $35,610 to $142,440 for a family of 7
• $39,630 to $158,520 for a family of 8

We seem to be an impoverished nation in the world of developed countries.

Many of these centers predominantly serve 'medicaid' beneficiaries. They also serve ( unintentionally) to isolate medicaid and those who are receivng public assistance from the main stream of health care.  Hospitals and providers also treat these patients differently, not so much in terms of the quality of care they receive....rather the accessibility.  Many budgetary decisions by states often effect Medicaid patients first, because large portions of state budgets are allocated to Medicaid.

There is a non-admitted  'caste' system when it comes to medical care.  It largely is secondary to income and location, and in cities there is often a sharp divide between those living in upper middle class neighborhoods and lower class neighborhoods.

The situation is also becoming worse, and there is no sign the Affordable  Care Act will diminish the divide.
Although the ACA specifies preventive medical care  (for free)  Despite being "free", there will be a cost. There are 14 general categories,   22 special categories for women, and 25 categories for children.

A disturbing distinction between public health and private health financing is also more evident with the introduction of health information technology. In order to qualify for Grants for Information systems and operational financing a non-profit status is a requirement, which immediately rules out most entrepenurial systems (ie, private fee for service office and/or clinics, as well as some hospitals.

Health Reform: A Play in Multiple Acts

It is a very exciting and troubling time  for health care in the United States.  The stage is set for multiple acts occurring simultaneously.

For those who have boots on the ground with financial commitments and assets the changing landscape means unknown profits (if any) or losses.  Health institutions and providers charged with improved outcomes and 'less cost' are facing the conundrum of supplying more care with less money.

Leonard Zwelling M.D., a Houston physician who was a congressional staffer during the writing of the affordable care act puts it this way, as he discusses a statement made by

Norman Ornstein, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, one of the leading experts on the workings of Congress, summed it up in one sentence during a briefing for the press and politicos in November 2008. He said:

"Every one's idea of health care reform is the same: I pay less."

Where I was trying to get my head around a solution to the three tenets of my idea of health care reform, everyone around me was trying to preserve or increase his piece of the health care payoff pie. I was looking for a legislative solution to assist the country in arriving at the place where the rest of the civilized world was - the provision of some form of universal health care as a right of citizenship. Everyone else was looking to cut a deal that preserved his place at the trough of health care profiteering. Guess who won?

With the full cooperation of the Congress and the White House, health care was not even remotely reformed. The Affordable Care Act is not about health care reform. It is about money, particularly preserving the insurance industry's hold over how health care dollars are spent.

Hospitals and providers had little to do with the Affordable Care Act.

"The Affordable Care Act continued to allow hospitals to jack up prices with no relation to actual costs. Only the doctors gave up something because, unlike the insurance industry and the pharmaceutical industry, medicine did not speak with one voice when lobbying on Capitol Hill and thus could largely be ignored. This is health care reform? I don't think so.

The reason the Affordable Care Act did what it did is because that's what it aimed to do - increase access to insurance for the uninsured, get everyone else to pay for it, and make sure no one currently in the health care business loses a dollar from the amounts they are already extracting from patients and doctors alike.

Complicating Ornstein's comments are the multiple scenes ongoing in the 'reform' efforts

Technological advancements such as

Health information technology which includes electronic health records, health information exchanges, the proposed upgrading of the ICD - 9 to ICD -10, the advances in mobile health, telemedicine and more.......

The increased regulatory arm with meaningful use in 3 steps.  MU is linked with financial  incentives from CMS to offset the expense of providers and hospital acquisition of electronic medical records.

The challenging role of an unproven health benefit exchange system, with an incomplete back end disconnecting the actual payment to insurers.





The details of connecting the dots are only now coming into focus for bureaucrats and congress who badly underestimated the complexity of health care delivery.  The turmoil is clearly more evident among providers, hospitals and the patients who are the "guinea pigs"

During the next 12 to 24 months the 'symphony" will unfold.  Will it be harmonious or an unfinished symphony?

Poll: Americans better understand, still don’t love, health-care reform

Lake forming behind an Ice Dam

The recent melt-down of the Affordable Care Act's opening of the Health.gov website served to cast a spotlight on the entire law.  More than 60% of the public pretend to know what it is about. That is about the same as Congress knew when they voted to enact the bill into law.

Despite and perhaps because of it's sudden visibility and the topic of all news media most know of it's shortcomings and how it was passed with major deceptions on the part of the Democrats, HHS, and President Obama's administration.

According to the Seattle Times, "A poll released today by Harris Interactive dug more deeply into the opinions of the uninsured, who face penalties if they don’t get insurance by March of next year. The survey found that more than one-third of uninsured Americans say they are prepared to make health-insurance choices — but 31 percent said they didn’t know about the health insurance exchanges set up to sell the coverage.

On top of that, 61 percent of the uninsured say they have done “nothing” in the past year to get ready for the Affordable Care Act. More than half say they don’t know what they’re going to do about the requirement that they get insurance."

As you may recall, it’s been rough going since the Oct. 1 launch of online insurance markets created to enroll people in individual insurance plans. The federal site, which serves 36 states, essentially wasn’t working for weeks and only really kicked into gear over the last week or so. Washington state’s site had some hiccups, then got itself sorted out, but in the past few days has been down again for software fixes.

Added to those technical glitches like a bee sting on a raging sunburn was the outcry by folks who learned their individual and family insurance plans were being canceled at the end of the year. People felt betrayed by President Obama’s promise that if you liked your health care plan, you could keep it.

A survey conducted and released last week by Gallup found that only 37 percent of Americans approve of the Affordable Care Act or would like to see it expanded while 52 percent want it revised or repealed (the rest are undecided).

The crazy thing — given all of the recent attention to the problems with the roll out of the health-insurance exchanges — is that public opinion hasn’t changed a whole bunch from the same Gallup survey nearly three years ago. In January 2011, 37 percent of those surveyed approved of the ACA while 57 percent did not.

So it begs the question: How and Why was the ACA passed into law?

Many think this was a major move toward consolidating control of healthcare costs, and giving government a major role in 1/6th of the American Economy. It effectively destroys a major freedom of choice of what Americans buy in a market place.

How could public opinion remain so constant despite the tumult in recent news? It could come down to politics.

The Seattle Times teamed up with the Elway Poll in September to take the ACA pulse of Washington residents. It turned out that public opinion on health-care reform largely hewed with political leanings.

In that survey, 80 percent of Democrats approved of the Affordable Care Act, while 80 percent of Republicans did not.

This may reflect more upon the discordance between Democrats and Republicans overall, including budget difficulties which are also severe given the expanding national debt.  Republicans are vehement about corraling the national debit, which will again take canter stage in March 2014.