Monday, September 26, 2022

Psychedelics Stocks to Watch (Updated 2022)

There is a new sector in the market, rivaling technology, industrial and financial firms. One of these companies could grow and pass other market leaders.  It may be a new thing beyond crypto and blockchain.

While there are those that dabble in financial fantasy, the ones who seem to be making money are the promoters who are charging top dollar for education and training in the new "CURRENCY".

Other late-breaking news is Virtual Reality also called the "Metaverse" Mark Zuckerberg parlayed Facebook into a much large market, the Metaverse, now hawking new hardware and software.  His clever move to buy Oculus signals a paradigm shift for social media. Users will be able to enter a virtual room and see all participants in 3D.  VR goes far beyond video streaming, and webinars online.

The psychedelics market continues to grow, and investors are looking for opportunities. This comprehensive list outlines psychedelics stocks to watch.

The small-cap market has been invaded by a flurry of psychedelics stocks to watch thanks to new company launches. Investors now have a variety of options for taking a run in the shroom stocks space.

In an effort to expand the capabilities of the medical field, companies are starting to investigate the potential of psychedelic medicines and are looking to raise capital in the public market.

While this industry is still in its early stages, the promising potential of psychedelic medicine drug products has attracted the interest of savvy investors eager for an emerging investment opportunity.

A shroom boom is in the works, led by encouraging results from psychedelic medicine treatments for various issues associated with mental health, and in connection to potential global law changes.

Here the Investing News Network presents a current list of psychedelics stocks to watch. The following stocks are all listed on public stock exchanges and are arranged alphabetically.

Aion Therapeutic (CSE:AION,OTC Pink:ANTCF)

Company Profile

Aion Therapeutic is in the business of research and development, treatment, data mining and state-of-the-art artificial intelligence techniques. It is focused on the development of combinatorial pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals and cosmeceuticals utilizing compounds from cannabis, psychedelic mushrooms, fungi, natural psychedelic formulations and other medicinal plants in a legal environment for this type of discovery.


Albert Labs (CSE:ABRT)

Press Releases

Company Profile

Albert Labs is Vancouver-based research and drug-development company focused on improving patient access to innovative mental health medications. The company is presently developing a natural psilocybin-based medication for patients with cancer-related distress.

Algernon Pharmaceuticals (CSE:AGN,OTCQB:AGNPF)

Company Profile

Algernon Pharmaceuticals is a clinical-stage drug-development company focused on the disease areas of stroke, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and chronic cough.


Allied (OTCQB:ALID)

Company Profile

Allied has both cannabinoid and psilocybin products in the pharmaceutical development track, and is seeking pharma drug indications for depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder.


ATAI Life Sciences (NASDAQ:ATAI)

Company Profile

ATAI Life Sciences is a clinical-stage biopharma company aiming to transform mental health disorder treatment.

For the remainder click below


Sunday, September 18, 2022

To boost or not to boost - by Eric Topol - Ground Truths

Here we go again !

To boost or not to boost

Should that be the question?

The reluctance for Americans to get a booster shot has been striking. The United States currently ranks 73rd among countries for its uptake of boosters at 33% of its population. All peer, rich countries around the world are at least double that rate. Countries ranking above the US now include Rwanda, Uzbekistan, Iran, Honduras, and Azerbaijan. Seemingly, you’d have to work very hard to show up this poorly as the country that first validated the vaccines, manufactures them, and has had such a surfeit supply that it has >50 million shots it can’t get anyone to take. Nonetheless, it has maintained optimism and purchased 171 million new Omicron BA.5 variant bivalent shots.

So why is the rate of immunization so low in the United States? It is not about science.  Eric Topol M.D. is a well-respected authority. Precision Medicine is touting how we need another booster shot. It is also not a political issue.  Americans no longer have faith in government recommendations.  During the last several decades the U.S. government made many poor choices, including severe restrictions, social distancing, personal protective equipment, and shutting down the economy, as well as promoting major wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In other countries that may be less developed, people accept government decisions,  not knowing the details about vaccines. %10%1

Our current rate of inflation (about 10%) is largely due to the stimulus packages. That was money we printed, for which there is no real backing.

On the one hand, according to Topol, there is incontrovertible evidence for the benefit of a booster.

Very strong evidence supporting boosters dates back to October 2021, when the results of the only large (~10,000 participants) (1st) booster randomized trial were released and later published, with a 95% reduction of symptomatic infections across all age groups, through the Delta wave, durable at that level for at least 4 months. There were no safety concerns or myocarditis. The efficacy level was fully restored to the original randomized trial (95%) reports in November 2020. 

The right question

Boosters provide substantive and unequivocal benefits for protection from severe Covid and are likely to help, to at less some degree, reduce Long Covid, and certainly have some early (2 months) effects for reducing infection and transmission. We don’t know yet if the BA.5 bivalent booster is any better than the BA.1 or the original booster. Based on the evolution of the virus through Omicron and its subvariants, it appears unlikely the new vaccine will have a major or important impact on reducing infection or transmission (we got a hint of that from the new BA.1 NEJM study above). There’s ample evidence from multiple studies that mucosal IgA antibodies are what will be needed to help block infections and transmission, such as this NEJM new report with 60-80% reduction of breakthrough infections (and reduced viral load, higher Ct, Tables below) as a function of mucosal IgA antibodies, not related to IgG antibodies. While they were formed in some health care workers as a response to vaccination and or infection, there is a way to induce them via nasal or oral vaccines. The durability of this effect isn’t yet known, but it would be far easier to take a nasal spray repetitively, with the expectation of much fewer side effects, than shots. Certainly encouraging data from CanSino’s newly approved inhaled vaccine vs Omicron is a solid precursor for the many programs that are in advanced clinical trials.


The right question is about the future. We can’t go on getting boosters every 4 to 6 months and the premise of an “annual” shot is that the virus exhibits seasonality like flu, which certainly isn’t the case. 

Economics play a large role in who gets vaccines. In poor countries, it is often not available.  In developed countries including the U.S. that is not a limiting factor.

The truth lies somewhere in the statistics which can be read below.

This reminds me of what a professor told me a long time ago.  Beware! Statistics often lie!

To boost or not to boost - by Eric Topol - Ground Truths: Should that be the question?




The Truth About the Flu Shot

The Truth About the Flu Shot





There are some surprising facts about the "regular flu shots"

What’s in the Regular Flu Shot?

  • Egg protein and avian contaminant viruses
  • Thimerosal (mercury): in multi-dose vials
  • Polysorbate 80:allergen; infertility in mice
  • Formaldehyde: carcinogen
  • Triton X100: detergent
  • Sucrose: table sugar
  • Resin: known allergen
  • Gentamycin: antibiotic
  • Gelatin: known allergen
Do Flu Shots Work?

Not in healthy babies:

 A review of 51 studies involving more than 294,000 children it was found there was “no evidence that injecting children 6-24 months of age with a flu shot was any more effective than placebo. In children over 2 yrs, it was only effective 33% of the time in preventing the flu.

Not in children with asthma: 

A study 800 children with asthma, half were vaccinated and the other half did not receive the influenza vaccine. The two groups were compared with respect to clinic visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations for asthma. CONCLUSION: This study failed to provide evidence that the influenza vaccine prevents pediatric asthma exacerbations.

Not in adults: In a review of 48 reports (more than 66,000 adults), “Vaccination of healthy adults only reduced risk of influenza by 6% and reduced the number of missed work days by less than one day (0.16) days. It did not change the number of people needing to go to hospital or take time off work.”

Not in the Elderly: In a review of 64 studies over 98 flu seasons of elderly living in nursing homes, flu shots were non-significant for preventing the flu. For elderly living in the community, vaccines were not (significantly) effective against influenza, ILI or pneumonia.

Saturday, September 10, 2022

Amazon plans job cuts in health-care unit after shuttering telehealth

About 159 Amazon Care employees will be laid off, while a standalone company that provided services for Amazon Care will cut 236 roles.

Amazon
 is preparing to cut more than 150 jobs as it winds down its telehealth offering known as Amazon Care, according to filings submitted in Washington state.

Amazon said 159 employees will be laid off from Amazon Care, based on Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) filings submitted late Thursday. The WARN Act requires employers to provide advance notice, generally within 60 days, of mass layoffs or plant closings.

Another 236 employees will be let go from Care Medical, a team of clinicians that was charged with treating Amazon Care patients, according to a separate WARN notice also filed Thursday. Care Medical is an independent company that was contracted to work with Amazon.

The layoffs are slated to begin Dec. 1, according to the filings.

Amazon said late last month that it will wind down its telehealth service after Dec. 31. The company chose to shutter the service after determining it wasn’t “a complete enough offering” for customers, Amazon said.

Amazon Care was one piece of Amazon’s strategy to upend the health-care industry, alongside its pharmacy and consumer diagnostics ventures. Even after shuttering Amazon Care, the company has continued its expansion into health care. In July, Amazon said it would acquire One Medical for $3.9 billion, bringing in a network of boutique primary care clinics.

Amazon Care launched in 2019 as a pilot program for employees in and around the company’s Seattle headquarters, before expanding to serve other employers. The service provides virtual urgent care visits, as well as free telehealth consults and in-home visits for a fee from nurses for testing and vaccinations.

At the time that Amazon announced it would shutter the service, the company said in a memo to employees that it would give them the opportunity to find roles elsewhere at Amazon.

“Many Care employees will have an opportunity to join other parts of the Health Services organization or other teams at Amazon — which we’ll be discussing with many of you shortly — and we’ll also support employees looking for roles outside of the company,” Amazon Health Services lead Neil Lindsay wrote in the memo.

An Amazon representative reiterated in an emailed statement that those affected will have the opportunity to find other jobs internally. “Our priority continues to be supporting our employees during this transition,” the statement said.

In the second quarter, Amazon shaved its headcount by 99,000 people to 1.52 million employees. The retail giant is taking steps to shrink its workforce as it looks to cut costs after growing its staff and warehouse footprint at an unprecedent pace during the Covid-19 pandemic.




Journal of Medical Internet Research - A Revised Hippocratic Oath for the Era of Digital Health

A Revised Hippocratic Oath for the Era of Digital Health

Is it time for physicians to have a new Hippocratic Oath?


Physicians have so many new tools at their disposal?  We have graduated from the written medical record to electronic medical records, stethoscopes, reflex hammers, percussion, and many tools using just our eyes, ears, tactical senses to echocardiograms, imaging and even artificial intelligence. 

It is time to modernize our oath, however ehtics must remain unchanged. Just as in the past economic conderns and limitations are not the purvue of treating physicians.  We have witnessed the impact of manged care, medicare regulations and other regulatory agencies, quality assurance and other metrics.

These additions have served to restrict what we advise our patients, who remain under our care.  Governemtn agencies and health insurance companies serve their own interests, usually financial in nature.  Physicians must still set the ultimate goal, caring for our patients.  Ethical concerns are not to be trivialized, or influenced by economic concerns.  Ethics guard patient welfare.  When laws and prefered practice patterns harm patients it is time for us to speak.

Bertalan Mesko, M.D. and Brennan Spiegel M.D. published  "A Revised Hippocratic Oath for the Era of Digital Health", in the online Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR)"

In the article Drs Mesko and Spiegel write,

"Physicians have been taking the Hippocratic Oath for centuries. The Oath contains a set of ethical rules designed to guide physicians through their profession; it articulates a set of true north principles that govern the practice of medicine. The Hippocratic Oath has undergone several revisions, most notably in 1948 by the World Medical Association. However, in an era of rapid change in medicine, we believe it is time to update the Oath with modest but meaningful additions so that it optimally reflects 21st century health care. The rise of digital health has dramatically changed the practice of medicine in a way that could not have been easily predicted at the time Hippocrates outlined his ethical principles of medicine. Digital health is a broad term that encompasses use of digital devices and platforms, including electronic health records, patient-provider portals, mobile health apps, wearable biosensors, artificial intelligence, social media platforms, and medical extended reality, to improve the process and outcomes of health care delivery. These technologies have driven a cultural transformation in the delivery of care. We offer modest suggestions to help prompt discussion and contemplation about the current Oath and its relevancy to our changing times. Our suggestions are not meant to be a definitive set of final recommendations. Rather, we propose new text that bodies such as the World Medical Association might consider integrating into an updated Oath, just as previous changes were adopted to ensure the Oath remains relevant and impactful for all physicians and their patients."



Keywords

hippocratic oath; digital health (273); eHealth (408); future (2); automation (5); ethics (20); viewpoint; medical perspective; physician perspective; ethical (2); digital divide (22); artificial intelligence (146); moral 

Thursday, September 8, 2022

Apple watch NIH STUDY

 


Researchers at Northwestern University and John Hopkins University plan to study if an Apple Watch app can help prevent strokes.

Tim Cook at the annual WWDC in Cupertino unveiled the new iPhone 14 along with the latest iteration of the Apple Watch. The Cupertino team carefully follows developments in remote monitoring. This iteration of the Apple Watch is quickly becoming a new 'carry' and/or the Leatherman tool for techies.  Numerous studies are forthcoming.  While the Apple Watch is not yet approved by the FDA it offers state of the art monitoring, notifications, alerts, and emergency notifications.



The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, a National Institutes of Health division, awarded a $37 million grant for researchers to test whether Apple Watches can be used as part of a strategy to cut down the use of expensive blood thinners used to prevent strokes from atrial fibrillation.

The American Heart Association, Johns Hopkins, Stanford, and the University of California, San Francisco, are also partners on the study, 

Afib is the most common heart rhythm disorder in adults, affecting 2.5 to 5 million Americans. That number is estimated to grow to 12.1 million by 2030. Worldwide, the estimated number of individuals with afib in 2010 was 33.5 million, according to a 2013 study.

The new NIH-funded trial will incorporate the use of an app on Apple Watch to monitor afib to attempt to reduce patients’ continuous and lifelong reliance on blood-thinning medication. 

The seven-year study, expected to launch next spring, will recruit 5,400 patients who will receive standard afib care of blood thinners or Apple Watch-directed treatment.

The trial will also examine whether the app can reduce major bleeding events compared to continuous therapy, according to a Northwestern press release.


Using the app on Apple Watch and an accompanying app on iPhone, patients in the trial will be able to target blood-thinning medication use for a limited period of time and only in response to a prolonged episode of afib. The study could ensure patients only take blood thinner medication when they’re at a high risk of stroke, according to researchers.


RELATED

Apple plans to add blood pressure monitoring, thermometer to smartwatch: report

“If proven effective, this new treatment paradigm will fundamentally change the standard of care for the millions of Americans living with AFib,” said principal investigator Dr. Rod Passman, director of the Center for Arrhythmia Research and a professor of medicine in the division of cardiology at Feinberg, in a press release.

“Many of these patients are on blood thinners for the rest of their lives even if they have infrequent episodes of atrial fibrillation,” Passman said. “If we can show this strategy is equally protective against stroke and reduces bleeding, that could save lives, reduce cost and improve quality of life.”  

For eight years, Passman has been studying solutions to end the standard “one-size-fits-all” practice of prescribing lifelong blood thinners (anticoagulants) to everyone with afib. 

Afib is a heart rhythm disorder characterized by fast and irregular heartbeats from the upper chambers of the heart. People with afib have increased risk of stroke, so many are continuously treated with blood-thinning medication to reduce that risk. But this treatment also raises the risk of bleeding, according to Passman, and balancing the risks and benefits can be challenging for both patients and physicians. 

However, some patients with afib have infrequent episodes of irregular heart rhythm either on their own or as the result of medications or procedures. Current evidence suggests the risk of stroke increases in the weeks following an episode of afib then returns to a baseline, raising the possibility of intermittent blood-thinner treatment. 

Since many individuals have no symptoms during an episode of afib, the new trial will employ Apple Watch to monitor heart activity, notify patients when they’re entering an afib episode and limit the length of time on blood thinners only to the high-risk period for stroke

This “pill-in-pocket” approach could protect patients against stroke while reducing bleeding events and the cost of afib treatment, Passman said. 

“We think advances in technology will allow us to personalize this care,” Passman said. “Why should patients expose themselves to the risk and cost of these drugs when they may not be benefiting?”


Tool to spot breast cancer at home wins UK Dyson award - BBC News

A device to help detect breast cancer has won the prestigious UK James Dyson Award.

The Dotplot aims to help women self-check at home and track any changes they may find on an app.

Breast cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in the UK but many women do not carry out regular self-examinations.

Medical professionals have welcomed the invention but warn it is no substitute for going to the doctor.

Users build a personalised map of their torso by inputting their breast size and shape and pressing the handheld device over their chest.

Once a month, soundwaves are used to record tissue composition - and if there are any suspicious changes or abnormalities, users are advised to see a healthcare professional.

The technology is very similar to mammograms for over-50s or ultrasound scans offered to women worried about a lump.

Oncologist Dr Frankie Jackson-Spence said: "Obviously, it's in the early stages of development, so it does need to go through medicine regulatory device checks to make sure that it is actually adequate at detecting breast cancers.

"It isn't a substitute for going to your doctor - it doesn't diagnose anything."

Survival rate

The earlier cancerous tissue is detected, the better.

The five-year survival rate for stage-one breast cancer is about 95%, which drops to about 25% by the time the cancer is in stage four.

Every year, there are 11,500 breast-cancer deaths in the UK.

Only 1% of cases are in males.

But 64% of women aged 18-35 fail to regularly check their breasts, according Cancer Research UK and CoppaFeel.

"It's important that you check all over the breast - including up into the armpit and up to the collarbone," Dr Jackson-Spence said.

Nipple discharge

But it is not just about looking for lumps.

Manveet Basra wellbeing head at charity Breast Cancer Now, told BBC News: "There are other signs of the disease to look for.

"These include nipple discharge or dimpling or puckering of the skin of the breast.



Tool to spot breast cancer at home wins UK Dyson award - BBC News