The Affordable Care Act, Accountable Care Organization and the Election

Better Together Health 2016 Event - Better Together     Are we really

The Affordable Care Act has stimulated many changes in health care. What is  considered good or bad depends upon the viewpoint of the provider and/or patient.

We have not yet seen the details of the Republican plan so Health Train Express will not offer our evaluation. Decisions based upon political rhetoric are at the least foolish, and at the worst dangerous.

It is doubtful if the ACA will be repealed entirely. Significant amendments ill be made. Other than some displeasure in the provider and health insurance industry patients who are able to access care are at less risk of not getting urgent care.  Even that presents problems in terms of provider accesss and the high deductible and premium expence for most receiving a partial subsidy. For those who are indigent, they have not expenses.

The progress of the organization being promoted by Medicare and some private insurers is the Accountable Care Organization (ACO).  The progress of developing this organization is fraught with many barriers. The ACO is an HMO on steroids.

Perhaps the closest organization to an ACO is the Kaiser Permanente model. The Counsel of Associated Physicians Group recently held a symposium, Better Together Health 2016 Event - Better Together.

The speakers represent a broad spectrum of the view on Accountable Care Organizations.

ROBERT PEARL, MD   CHAIR, COUNCIL OF ACCOUNTABLE PHYSICIAN PRACTICES
Robert Pearl, MD, is Executive Director and CEO of The Permanente Medical Group and President and CEO of the Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group. Dr. Pearl serves on the faculties of the Stanford University School of Medicine and Graduate School of Business. Dr. Pearl is a frequent lecturer on the opportunities to use 21st century tools and technology to improve both the quality and cost of health care, while simultaneously making care more convenient and personalized.

SENATOR JOHNNY ISAKSON    (R-GA), CO-CHAIR, SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE CHRONIC CARE WORKING GROUP

Senator John Hardy Isakson (R-GA) is serving his second term in the U.S. Senate, and was recently tapped to lead the Senate Finance Committee’s Chronic Care Solutions working group with Senator Mark Warner (D-VA). The work of the bipartisan committee is to begin exploring solutions that will improve outcomes for Medicare patients requiring chronic care. Isakson is the first Georgian since the 1800s to have served in the state House, state Senate, U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. He also serves on the Senate HELP Committee, Senate Finance Committee, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the Senate Ethics Committee, and the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee.

TIM GRONNIGEr    DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, DIRECTOR OF DELIVERY SYSTEM REFORM AT CMS
Tim Gronniger is the deputy chief of staff and director of delivery system reform at CMS. He was formerly a senior adviser for healthcare policy at the White House Domestic Policy Council (DPC), where he was responsible for coordinating administration activities in healthcare delivery system reform. Before joining DPC he was a senior professional staff member for Ranking Member Henry Waxman at the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, responsible for drafting and collaborating to develop elements of the Affordable Care Act. Before joining the Committee staff, Tim spent over four years at the Congressional Budget Office.

CECI CONNOLLY    PRESIDENT AND CEO, ALLIANCE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH PLANS

Ceci Connolly became president and CEO of the Alliance of Community Health Plans in January 2016. In her role, she works with some of the most innovative executives in the health sector to provide high-quality, evidence-based, affordable care. Connolly has spent more than a decade in health care, first as a national correspondent for The Washington Post and then in thought leadership roles at two international consulting firms. She is a leading thinker in the disruptive forces shaping the health industry and has been a trusted adviser to C-suite executives who share her commitment to equitable, patient-centered care.

KAREN CABELL, DO    CHIEF OF QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, BILLINGS CLINIC

Dr. Karen Cabell is the chief of quality and patient safety and a practicing internal medicine physician at Billings Clinic, an integrated medical foundation healthcare organization, located in Billings, Montana. Dr. Cabell has implemented diabetes, heart failure and HTN disease management registries along with point-of-care tools for patients and clinicians to better manage chronic disease. She was involved with Billings’ rollout and adoption of an electronic health record implementation since 2004 including all clinic sites and regional partners to include 15 other hospitals with clinics across a 500-mile radius. Dr. Cabell has been instrumental in gaining alignment between the EHR, quality and patient safety as well as strategic planning to support Billings Clinic’s organizational goals of clinical excellence, operational efficiency, market growth and development, and financial strength.

REGINA HOLLIDAY    PATIENT RIGHTS ACTIVIST, ARTIST, AUTHOR

Artist Regina Holliday is a patient advocate known for her series of murals depicting the need for clarity and transparency in medical records, and for founding the Walking Gallery movement. The Walking Gallery consists of more than 350 volunteer members who make statements about the lapses in health care at public meetings by wearing business suits or blazers painted with patient stories. Holliday’s experiences during her husband’s illness and subsequent death inspired her to use painting as a catalyst for change. Backed by her own patient and caregiving experiences, she travels the globe heralding her message of patient empowerment and inclusion in healthcare decision making. Holliday’s mission is to demand a thoughtful dialog with officials and practitioners on the role patients play in their own healthcare.

MARC KLAU, MD

ASSISTANT REGIONAL MEDICAL DIRECTOR, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP

Dr. Marc Klau has been with the Southern California Permanente Medical Group for 31 years. He is currently the regional chief of Head and Neck Surgery, providing leadership for 100 surgeons.  He is also the Assistant Regional Medical Director for Education, Learning and Leadership. He now oversees the new KP School of Medicine and all of the Southern California Kaiser Permanente residencies, as well as continuing medical education and leadership.

JANET MARCHIBRODA

Artist Regina Holliday is a patient advocate known for her series of murals depicting the need for clarity and transparency in medical records, and for founding the Walking Gallery movement. The Walking Gallery consists of more than 350 volunteer members who make statements about the lapses in health care at public meetings by wearing business suits or blazers painted with patient stories. Holliday’s experiences during her husband’s illness and subsequent death inspired her to use painting as a catalyst for change. Backed by her own patient and caregiving experiences, she travels the globe heralding her message of patient empowerment and inclusion in healthcare decision making. Holliday’s mission is to demand a thoughtful dialog with officials and practitioners on the role patients play in their own healthcare.

DIRECTOR, HEALTH INNOVATION INITIATIVE, BIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER

Janet Marchibroda is the director of the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Health Innovation Initiative in Washington, DC. She has been recognized as one of the Top 25 Women in Healthcare by Modern Healthcare and is a nationally recognized expert on the use of health IT to improve healthcare quality.

LEANA WEN, MD  HEALTH COMMISSIONER, BALTIMORE CITY

Since taking the reins of America’s oldest health department in Baltimore, Dr. Leana Wen has been reimagining the role of public health including in violence prevention, addiction treatment, and urban revitalization. Under Dr. Wen’s leadership, the Baltimore City Health Department has launched an ambitious overdose prevention program that is training every resident to save lives, as well as a citywide youth health and wellness plan. She is the author of the book, When Doctors Don’t Listen: How to Avoid Misdiagnoses and Unnecessary Tests, and is regularly featured on National Public Radio, CNN, New York Times, and Washington Post. Her talk on TED.com on transparency in medicine has been viewed nearly 1.5 million times.

Better Together Health 2016 Event - Better Together

Enrolled in Covered California...Have insurance? Think Again

Even hardcore supporters of the affordable care act are speaking publicly about the shortcomings and misdirections of the Afffordable Care Act…  and the necessity to modify the law.  Still there is much resistance to repealing the law.

The enrollment process is somewhat easier, however the choices are still a challenge. It is stragiht forward on selecting your level of eligibility.  Choosing plans is more of a challenge, especially if some of the information is incorrect such as providers, hospitals and other service providers.  

Enrollment data is beginning to accumulate, however there have been no public announcements regarding payment of premiums, nor analysis of types of policies.

The selection process is important. For some levels the copays and deductibles are very high. Although  premiums  appear to be low in some cases patients will need to be prepared to spend substantial portions of their income for medications, copays for laboratory, imaging and other testing.  For those who are relatively healthy and do not ‘consume’ much in the way of health care it won’t be a burdern.   For those who have chronic and/or serious illness who may need to be seen three or four times in a month….say a newly diagnosed diabetic, (they may be faced with four provider copays amounting to $160.00 and other copays for labs and/x-rays. Add this to the premium, and the monthly payment rises.  For those on subsidies this additonal burden on a modest income is significant.

For those who are euphoric about finally obtaining insurance coverage some will be surprised to find all is not well and the plans fall short of ‘guarranteeing’ health care for them.  A challenge will be finding a provider who accepts affordable care act plans.   It is going to require 12 months or more to feret out the good from the bad policies.  

Providers are on the line as well. Many high deductible policies will place hospitals at risk, when their patients cannot afford a deductible of 10,000-12,000 dollars. This will require cost shifting to balance the equations, and will not alleviate some medically induced bankruptcies.

Affordable Care Act.......The Missing Link....It is not Australopithecus

Houston, we  have a problem  "Failure to Launch"

Despite a goal of access to health care for all, however the hinge on the door for acccess is squeaking. News such as this are appearing in medical news.

Family Planning Clinics In Calif. Squeezed By Health Law KQED - February 10, 2014 Millions Trapped in Health-Law Coverage Gap Wall Street Journal - February 9, 2014 They quit their jobs, thanks to health-care law Washington Post - February 9, 2014 Enrolling in Covered California is not for the weak of heart, or spirit.  For those who were previously uninsured for a variety of reasons the affordable care act raise spirits with the elimination of the fear of not being able to pay for health care. The current system was not sustainable financially, however health care is available taking away the financial morass of insurance companies, bureaucracy and government.  Neither government, nor insurance companies provide health care. Physiciains, nurses, hospitals and many other providers care for patients. A consequence of the change will be the marked reduction in 'free care'. The old model of those fortunate enough to pay for their own care, and providers and hospitals having deep pockets to finance care for the less priveleged of our society. In order to assure health care and security for all the down side is forfeiting freedom. The tyranny of absolute security is freedom. Some of  us understand the concept and the reason for opposition to the affordable care act.  Others see it as an opportunity   for free health care.   Those whol will receive this generosity are often not only uninsured, but also un-empowered, and have little impact, are passive and do not have resources, nor influence to make changes. The U.S. Constitution (    )  guarrantees the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  That statement places us in a conundrum.  Does that mean care to avoid illness, or treatment to keep one alive? This is not some ephemeral abstract thought embodied in our founding document. Other constitutional guarrantees in the past have been manipulated to make change The Affordable Care Act in Californa is known as  'Covered California'.  Patients who sign up are screened for eligibilty based on income and household size. Those who's income is greater than........are required to purchase a subsidized health insurance policy or face a fine.  Some of these policies look nice, offered by stable companies, such as Blue Shield, Healthnet, Anthem and their providers are listed under providers for Covered California.  However with a more in depth search you will find they did not receive contracts and are not providers.  (small details).....this will reduce access to providers (and some hospitals). None of this has been adequatly explained  Some who look forward to using Covered California should call their chosen provider and ask if they are a provider for Covered California.   Many of them are not, and some may not even know if they are signed up for it.

Signing up for the Affordable Care Act

Step one:

Access your Health Benefit Echange on the Web.  Register, if you want to (or can) Write down your user ID and password.   It may not matter since your user id and password may not be saved in the system.  Rather than using  your SS number or case number they want  you to make up a user id and/or password you will likely forget.

Expect to receive  a message the site is down, we want to help you try again later. blah, blah, blah.
Once you are able to access the site the page loads will be irregular, very slow  to load and may disconnect.   Your best time to reach a site is between mindinte and 5  AM,  however  you also may receive "the site is down for maintenance'... try during our regular business hours.

When you resort to calling.  Set your telephone auto dialer and begin calling at five minutes before the exchanges open.  I receive a message that my wait time would be 5 minutes....I waited 45 minutes.  This was after ten attempts during regular business hours. If  you do not call before ten minutes after the phones are on....forget it.


Step two:

Once I accessed a human being, things went very well. The agent was more than helpful and spent 30 minutes going over enrollment.  In fact because my first attempt went so badly even with help I had to re-enroll in a different insurance company.  Some of the least expensive plansl have very limited provider and hospital access.

Because I am a retired MD I know many of the physicians that were listed as providers. The providers were often foreign medical graduates, spoke multiple languages, such as Vietnamese, Tagalag, Hindi, and Spanish. The FMGs were multicultural.    Also most of the providers in Covered California were predominantly former Med-Cal providers and familiar with Medicaid patients and reimbursement.

The printed subsidies were complicated and many times the subsidy rates made no sense for some policies. The best approach is to wait an receive your invoice, then call if you have a question.  Be certain it is correct because once you pay your premium you are locked in for one year, except for life-changing events such as additon to famly, loss of employment and/or changes in income. The next entrollment period is October 2014.

My advice is to not rush. Delaying enrollment will only mean your activation date is delayed a month. Spend a lot of time going over all your options for your income level. Search from   high to low premiums to assess the differences,  which can be subtle with deductibles, co pays for drugs and providers. Some have high co pays for medications. Plan on spending several hours to study it and assess your needs.  The web site is very good for comparing   how much  medical care you use annually, and the number of prescription drugs you use.

Now that my wife is enrolled I am relieved....15 years with her being uninsurable, with a very high copayment for her disability Medi-caid coverage was terrible, and inhumane.

Regardless of the Affordable Care Act. having an insurance cared will NOT cure our problems. The ACA does not address accessibilty, uniformity of coverage, or qualty of care.  Most of the law addresses insurance companies, and does nothing to relieve providers from a terrible and overriding responsibility for their patients with little help or cooperation from the bureaucrats.

Media reports indicate there will be a serious and committed effort to make major amendment, additions to, or repeal the Act.  Most responsible leaders who are not political idealogues are in favor of this course.

The United States of Affordable Care (Act)

Health Care Financing would seem to be a long way off from the patient waiting to see their physician.

In today's world the quantitiy and qualitiy of care depends very much upon the type of health insurance the patient has to use.   The care may be far different according to region, or state.

The term 'public health ' is a misnomer. The public health system is not accessible to all people for a number of reasons.  Many perceive public health as inferior to the 'private system of health care", and only would access a center if there were no other option. Many current users of public health and/or Federally Qualified Health Centers would not even know how to access ' private care'. Learn more about them here and here and  here.  I particularly like the last one. No one home --

The resource cannot be found.

If you are successful, the rules are as long as the Affordable Care Act.

A new term which may be unfamiliar to most providers and/or patients is the "Federally Qualified Health  Centers".  These centers are found more commonly in areas of low economic assets and amongst many people who fall in the range of the Federal Poverly Level (FPL).  And here are the numbers which are both unrealistic at the lower end and even more unbelievable at the top end.

• $11,490 to $45,960 for individuals
• $15,510 to $62,040 for a family of 2
• $19,530 to $78,120 for a family of 3
• $23,550 to $94,200 for a family of 4
• $27,570 to $110,280 for a family of 5
• $31,590 to $126,360 for a family of 6
• $35,610 to $142,440 for a family of 7
• $39,630 to $158,520 for a family of 8

We seem to be an impoverished nation in the world of developed countries.

Many of these centers predominantly serve 'medicaid' beneficiaries. They also serve ( unintentionally) to isolate medicaid and those who are receivng public assistance from the main stream of health care.  Hospitals and providers also treat these patients differently, not so much in terms of the quality of care they receive....rather the accessibility.  Many budgetary decisions by states often effect Medicaid patients first, because large portions of state budgets are allocated to Medicaid.

There is a non-admitted  'caste' system when it comes to medical care.  It largely is secondary to income and location, and in cities there is often a sharp divide between those living in upper middle class neighborhoods and lower class neighborhoods.

The situation is also becoming worse, and there is no sign the Affordable  Care Act will diminish the divide.
Although the ACA specifies preventive medical care  (for free)  Despite being "free", there will be a cost. There are 14 general categories,   22 special categories for women, and 25 categories for children.

A disturbing distinction between public health and private health financing is also more evident with the introduction of health information technology. In order to qualify for Grants for Information systems and operational financing a non-profit status is a requirement, which immediately rules out most entrepenurial systems (ie, private fee for service office and/or clinics, as well as some hospitals.

Health Reform: A Play in Multiple Acts

It is a very exciting and troubling time  for health care in the United States.  The stage is set for multiple acts occurring simultaneously.

For those who have boots on the ground with financial commitments and assets the changing landscape means unknown profits (if any) or losses.  Health institutions and providers charged with improved outcomes and 'less cost' are facing the conundrum of supplying more care with less money.

Leonard Zwelling M.D., a Houston physician who was a congressional staffer during the writing of the affordable care act puts it this way, as he discusses a statement made by

Norman Ornstein, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, one of the leading experts on the workings of Congress, summed it up in one sentence during a briefing for the press and politicos in November 2008. He said:

"Every one's idea of health care reform is the same: I pay less."

Where I was trying to get my head around a solution to the three tenets of my idea of health care reform, everyone around me was trying to preserve or increase his piece of the health care payoff pie. I was looking for a legislative solution to assist the country in arriving at the place where the rest of the civilized world was - the provision of some form of universal health care as a right of citizenship. Everyone else was looking to cut a deal that preserved his place at the trough of health care profiteering. Guess who won?

With the full cooperation of the Congress and the White House, health care was not even remotely reformed. The Affordable Care Act is not about health care reform. It is about money, particularly preserving the insurance industry's hold over how health care dollars are spent.

Hospitals and providers had little to do with the Affordable Care Act.

"The Affordable Care Act continued to allow hospitals to jack up prices with no relation to actual costs. Only the doctors gave up something because, unlike the insurance industry and the pharmaceutical industry, medicine did not speak with one voice when lobbying on Capitol Hill and thus could largely be ignored. This is health care reform? I don't think so.

The reason the Affordable Care Act did what it did is because that's what it aimed to do - increase access to insurance for the uninsured, get everyone else to pay for it, and make sure no one currently in the health care business loses a dollar from the amounts they are already extracting from patients and doctors alike.

Complicating Ornstein's comments are the multiple scenes ongoing in the 'reform' efforts

Technological advancements such as

Health information technology which includes electronic health records, health information exchanges, the proposed upgrading of the ICD - 9 to ICD -10, the advances in mobile health, telemedicine and more.......

The increased regulatory arm with meaningful use in 3 steps.  MU is linked with financial  incentives from CMS to offset the expense of providers and hospital acquisition of electronic medical records.

The challenging role of an unproven health benefit exchange system, with an incomplete back end disconnecting the actual payment to insurers.





The details of connecting the dots are only now coming into focus for bureaucrats and congress who badly underestimated the complexity of health care delivery.  The turmoil is clearly more evident among providers, hospitals and the patients who are the "guinea pigs"

During the next 12 to 24 months the 'symphony" will unfold.  Will it be harmonious or an unfinished symphony?

Freedom of Information Act Request filed by Health Train Express

Doctors Complain They Will Be Paid Less by Exchange Plans.  Many will opt out of private plans. News reports indicate that 70% of California MDs will not participate in the Health Exchange and the Private plans Some have complained to medical associations, including those in New York, California, Connecticut, Texas and Georgia, saying the discounted rates could lead to a two-tiered system in which fewer doctors participate, potentially making it harder for consumers to get the care they need.

Insurance officials acknowledge they have reduced rates in some plans, saying they are under enormous pressure to keep premiums affordable. They say physicians will make up for the lower pay by seeing more patients, since the plans tend to have smaller networks of doctors.

If you’re a physician and you’ve negotiated a rate from insurance, shouldn’t it be the same on or off the exchange?” said Matthew Katz, executive vice president of the Connecticut State Medical Society. “You’re providing the same service.”

The benchmark for physician fees is the rate the federal government sets for services provided to older Americans through Medicare. In many markets, commercial plans may pay slightly above the Medicare rates, while doctors say that many of the new exchange plans are offering rates below that.

Physicians are uncomfortable discussing their rates because of antitrust laws, and insurers say the information is proprietary. But information cobbled together from interviews suggests that if the Medicare pays $90 for an office visit of a complex nature, and a commercial plan pays $100 or more, some exchange plans are offering $60 to $70. Doctors say the insurers have not always clearly spelled out the proposed rate reductions.

Health Train Express has filed a FOIA request from CMS (Freedom of Information Act which will require full disclosure to the providers and public  (ie, transparency that Obama claims to encourage)  Watch for the published link in about one month

WHY YOUR DOCTOR WON'T (CAN'T) SEE YOU NOW , AND HOW TO GET AROUND IT

October, November and December 2013 have been rough months for all Americans. The effects of the Affordable Care Act are having some predictable effects on our health system.  In addition to what has happened, unknown secondary effects are still boiling below the surface of health reform.

Many Americans are concerned about the viability and even the enrollment process for the Affordable Care Act.

Some of these patients will seek out alternative methods to obtain acute or even routine necessary health care.  Cash will become a new source for paying your doctor.

In the midst of the Obamacare fiasco, direct payment and concierge practices are an alternative, and perhaps a necessity to obtain health covereage, even for the short term.

For every great challenge there are also great opportunities, such as direct payment practice. However caution is a necessity.

CALIFORNIA: 70 percent of California doctors plan to boycott Obamacare exchanges

Many reputable neutral sources have reported, " About 70 percent of California’s 104,000 doctors are reportedly planning to stay out of the state’s health insurance exchange, a move that could have significant impact on implementation of the Affordable Care Act.  

This is not a 'willful" arbitrary decision on the part of these physicians.  It is a logical and sound business decision to remain fiscally viable and avoid insolvency. As states across the country work to enroll Americans in the ACA, one question that remains is exactly what kind of doctor access patients will have when their coverage kicks in. According to the president of the California Medical Association, Dr. Richard Thorp, residents there could find limited options at the start of the new year.

Thorp told the Washington Examiner the primary reason that seven-out-of-10 California doctors are boycotting the Obamacare exchange is due to the state’s low Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement rates, which typically land 30 percent below those in other parts of the country.

For example, Medicare typically pays doctors $76 for return-office visits, but in California doctors only receive $24. A tonsillectomy, meanwhile, pays out between $500 and $700, whereas doctors in California receive $160 for the procedure.

“We need some recognition that we’re doing a service to the community,” Thorp said. “But we can’t do it for free. And we can’t do it at a loss. No other business would do that.”

“This is so poorly designed that a lot of doctors are afraid to participate,” said Dr. Sam Unterricht, president of the 29,000-member medical society, to the New York Post.“There’s a lot of resistance. Doctors don’t know what they’re going to get paid.”  California’s Medi-Cal reimbursement rates have long been a sticking point for doctors, but when insurance companies revealed their rates would be tied to the state’s Medicaid program, many physicians balked.

This sign indicates the extreme distress the Medi-cal system will endure from ObamaCare in California.

To make matters more confusing, multiple medical association leaders told the Examiner that many of the doctors listed as participants in Covered California, the state’s insurance marketplace, have not stated they’d accept patients from the exchange.

“They may be listed as actually participating, but not of their own volition,” said Donald Waters, executive director of the Alameda-Contra Costa Medical Association.

“Enrollment doesn’t mean access, because there aren’t enough doctors to take the low rates of Medicaid,” Alex Briscoe, health director for Alameda County Health Care Services Agency in California, said to the Examiner. “There aren’t enough primary care physicians, period.”

Rob Lamberts M.D. a DPC physician offers his experience and advice to other physicians

RT, a popular online Russian news source reports the same information

If you want to know more about direct payment programs, and models consider reading Concierge Medicine Today

The content of this post offer opinions on both sides of the issues, patients and providers.

Poll: Americans better understand, still don’t love, health-care reform

Lake forming behind an Ice Dam

The recent melt-down of the Affordable Care Act's opening of the Health.gov website served to cast a spotlight on the entire law.  More than 60% of the public pretend to know what it is about. That is about the same as Congress knew when they voted to enact the bill into law.

Despite and perhaps because of it's sudden visibility and the topic of all news media most know of it's shortcomings and how it was passed with major deceptions on the part of the Democrats, HHS, and President Obama's administration.

According to the Seattle Times, "A poll released today by Harris Interactive dug more deeply into the opinions of the uninsured, who face penalties if they don’t get insurance by March of next year. The survey found that more than one-third of uninsured Americans say they are prepared to make health-insurance choices — but 31 percent said they didn’t know about the health insurance exchanges set up to sell the coverage.

On top of that, 61 percent of the uninsured say they have done “nothing” in the past year to get ready for the Affordable Care Act. More than half say they don’t know what they’re going to do about the requirement that they get insurance."

As you may recall, it’s been rough going since the Oct. 1 launch of online insurance markets created to enroll people in individual insurance plans. The federal site, which serves 36 states, essentially wasn’t working for weeks and only really kicked into gear over the last week or so. Washington state’s site had some hiccups, then got itself sorted out, but in the past few days has been down again for software fixes.

Added to those technical glitches like a bee sting on a raging sunburn was the outcry by folks who learned their individual and family insurance plans were being canceled at the end of the year. People felt betrayed by President Obama’s promise that if you liked your health care plan, you could keep it.

A survey conducted and released last week by Gallup found that only 37 percent of Americans approve of the Affordable Care Act or would like to see it expanded while 52 percent want it revised or repealed (the rest are undecided).

The crazy thing — given all of the recent attention to the problems with the roll out of the health-insurance exchanges — is that public opinion hasn’t changed a whole bunch from the same Gallup survey nearly three years ago. In January 2011, 37 percent of those surveyed approved of the ACA while 57 percent did not.

So it begs the question: How and Why was the ACA passed into law?

Many think this was a major move toward consolidating control of healthcare costs, and giving government a major role in 1/6th of the American Economy. It effectively destroys a major freedom of choice of what Americans buy in a market place.

How could public opinion remain so constant despite the tumult in recent news? It could come down to politics.

The Seattle Times teamed up with the Elway Poll in September to take the ACA pulse of Washington residents. It turned out that public opinion on health-care reform largely hewed with political leanings.

In that survey, 80 percent of Democrats approved of the Affordable Care Act, while 80 percent of Republicans did not.

This may reflect more upon the discordance between Democrats and Republicans overall, including budget difficulties which are also severe given the expanding national debt.  Republicans are vehement about corraling the national debit, which will again take canter stage in March 2014.

CMS AND ONC ACT TO SLOW DOWN THE HEALTH TRAIN EXPRESS

The Center for Medicare Services and the Office of the National Coordinator are responding to the intense "push back' from providers, insurance companies, health consultants and others. Realizing the debacle of  Healthcare.gov may be a tremor of impending catastrophic health reform failure they have chosen to 'back off' and delay several major milestones for HIT.

Numerous mandates for the Affordable Care Act have been delayed due to what seems to be a systemic overload of HHS and other regulatory agencies that go beyond the Affordable Care Act.

1. Individual Mandate
2. Last date of enrollment on Healthcare.gov pushed back to December 23rd for a January 1 2014 enrollment. (Is this another pipe dream?  7 days from enrollment to eligibility with authentication of finances?..Another example of fantasy planning by Obama and his administration..

These delays are only the tip of an iceberg upon which the Titanic Obamacare ship founders.

Early on in 2010 shortly after the Affordable Care Act became law, the DOJ warned about employer sponsored health plans.  Rather than the Health Benefit Exchange impacting on only five percent of the population, the actual numbers willl be much greater perhaps as great as 80% excluding public programs.