Parachutes (and balloons)

Do you have your parachute on?

 

No, I am not speaking about the ‘golden one’ that many CEOs and financial wizards seem to deserve for their “financial wizardry”.
I mean the one that you will need when you are swept off the cliff by the ‘lemings’ cascading before the onslaught of insurance companies, Medicare, software vendors, EMRs, RHIOs, P4P, QA and hundreds of other eponyms.  Even as I back-pedal my feet slip closer and closer to the cliff of doom.
Sid Schwab in his most recent blog post of Cutting through the Crap seems to nail the problem on it’s head. (posted February 11, 2010…UNWORKABLE). It goes far beyond healthcare and medicine. It is a problem we physicians have recognized two or more decades ago.   Perhaps it is not because we are smarter or more intelligent than other citizens, but we do seem to be exposed to more human suffering and tragedy as well as a cornucopia of human experience, both good and bad.  For the longest time we were privileged to be able to rise above the morass and observe, without personal threat or financial anxiety.  It gave us the benefit of a certain altruism and privilege of caring for people, not out of financial necessity, but of moral compass and humanity.

How Much is a Trillion Dollars

A trillion here, a trillion there. In the words of Governor Bobby Jindall of Louisiana fame, “This here is a fine pot of gumbo”. 

He continues in his comments for the WSJ “I honestly do not know one single individual who is happy with this situation. Not one. Not a Republican, a Democrat or an independent. These actions are all problematic individually, but taken as a whole, they are devastating. So against that backdrop, we enter the health care reform debate. I honestly do not know one single individual who is happy with this situation. Not one. Not a Republican, a Democrat or an independent. These actions are all problematic individually, but taken as a whole, they are devastating. So against that backdrop, we enter the health care reform debate. I know a little something about health care policy, and I can tell you exactly the game that is currently afoot. If the House Democrats’ plan were to become law, the president’s statement that “if you like your health care now, you can keep it” will not be true. This is not an opinion, this is a fact.”

You Lie, and Too Many mis-statements

Obama's lieutenants (Heads of Cabinet positions and Departments) seem to make outrageous statements that any simpleton can see through.  The first egregious mis-step was on the part of Secretary Napolitano (her name reminds me of an ice cream, a mix of pink, white, and brown flavors (like Obama's mindset).

Her initial statement that all went well with DHS's methods of preventing terror attacks such as the one on a recent airline flight, was quickly retracted and modified into a politically correct statement. 

The next misstep  was by the head of the Department of Transportation, that everyone owning a Toyota should stop driving it until a fix can be accomplished.  Obviously again retracted the next day.  Has Obama hired a bunch of idiots based upon political correctness?  Let's not even talk about our attorney general. Afraid to back down and turn the terrorist over to military police, he has spun this story into the success measured by events which took place prior to the detention facility at Guantanamo and the organization of military tribunals.

Can we afford these kinds of mistakes in general, and what will happen to health care?  Whoops I didn't mean to give you the wrong diagnosis.  

Certainly our adversaries have noticed these incompetencies. And where is congress?  Buried in a dark hidden 'transparent' room masturbating over health care legislation. Strong words, not politically correct, nor tasteful, but true.......

Charitable Largesse

Bill Gates (former Microsoft CEO) announced a 10 billion dollar grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for the development and distribution of vaccines to combat malaria. Vaccines against diarrhea, pneumonia and tuberculosis would save millions of children in developing world countries.

Mr Gates will go down in history as another Carnegie, Robert Woods Johnson, or Howard Hughes, Warren Buffet, George Soros, Li Ka- Shing.

Out of Office

I did not realize it's been ten days since I last posted here. Had to take an emergency trip to the 'left coast', but should be back in several days. Wouldn't you know it, I return to California not to sunshine but a big El Nino...5 days of pouring rain, mud watches and high winds.

A Cents of Humor

One of my favorite bloggers is Placebo Journal.

This is borrowed from Dr. Douglas Farrago. Laugh on Dougie......Doug can be found on his own web site @  http://www.placebojournal.com/    I laugh so hard my liver starts to ache !!  Doug is from Maine, so that explains much of his 'common cents".

Sound Familiar? by Michael Gorback MD

By noreply@blogger.com (Placebo Journal Blog: Medical Humor with a Purpose!)

I don't know how many of you have heard the new buzz about ACO's -
accountable cost organizations. If you have been following discussions
about Massachusetts health care you have seen this suggested.
ACOs are groups of doctors that receive a fixed amount of money and then
provide all of a patient's health care needs. I guess they figure they
can glue together a pediatrician, a heart surgeon, a dermatologist, etc
and make a cohesive group that provides one-stop shopping for all health
care needs. If the patient needs an MRI, the ACO pays for it. Hip
replacement, same thing. Labs, xrays, the whole deal. Kind of like an
insurance company, except now the doctors are the insurance company
without having any insurance company experience. We take in fixed
premiums and pay out benefits.
Does this sound like back to the future?This is basically capitation
revisited.
The geniuses in Washington, who think we are as corrupt as they are,
believe that instead of paying us to "do things" (which seems to be ok

The geniuses in Washington, who think we are as corrupt as they are,
believe that instead of paying us to "do things" (which seems to be ok
for everybody but doctors) they can control costs this way. After all,
you'll think twice before you rip out that kid's tonsils if you have to
pay for it. Considering deliberately mismanaging someone's diabetes so
you can get $50,000 for a BKA? Not if it comes out of your own hide.
I think it will succeed, because if you stop paying people to "do
things" they will pretty much stop doing things. In my specialty the
general goal for most of us is to get a patient's pain under control
with minimal reliance on pain meds. Some of these modalities are
expensive. A spinal cord stimulator lead costs $1500, and the battery
about 10x that. An intrathecal pump is about $10,000. These are hardware
prices. they don't include O.R., anesthesia, etc.
So here I am in my new ACO office and a patient comes in with horrible
pain from failed back surgery that has been refractory to just about
everything.
* I know a stim could potentially help a lot.
* However, I also know that if I go around putting $15-20,000 worth of
hardware into people my partners are not going to be happy.
* I also know that writing a prescription is far easier and much better
for my health than spending an hour in front of a c-arm wearing a lead
apron under hot lights. And I will make MORE money that way. Plus, you can't surf the Internet while scrubbed.
So what's going to happen? They gave me an incentive to not do things
and I will accommodate them. Here's your methadone. It's cheap. Try not
to let your QT intervals get too long. If it makes you sick I'll call in

and I will accommodate them. Here's your methadone. It's cheap. Try not
to let your QT intervals get too long. If it makes you sick I'll call in
some Phenergan for you. No wait -- that might drop your WBC. That means
paying for lab tests. Try some flat ginger ale. That's what my mother
gave me for a tummy ache. Excuse me, time to check my email.
This didn't work when it was called capitation. I don't see how it will
work this time, and I can't imagine how they plan to get doctors to join
into diversified groups without killing each other. Maybe it will be
assigned seating like high school. Maybe they have figured out how to
herd cats. Maybe the CIA has secret pheromones that will make us
cooperate like ants and bees.
I want to know what will happen when a patient hates the group's
endocrinologist and wants to go "out-of-ACO". Can you do that, or do you
send the doctor and the patient to counseling to work it out? What if
the cardiologist you want is in another group?
What if you are a very popular or famous doctor, in big demand? Can you
threaten to go to another ACO if they don't give you more money? Will
there be a draft for doctors coming out of residency? When can you
become a free agent?
The ACO's are also supposed to help "coordinate care". This is the new
buzz word. The old buzz word, "preventive care", turned out to be not so
good after the data showed that it actually costs more to do tests on asymptomatic people. Not to mention that a PAP smear or colonoscopy is not preventive so much as early detection. Smallpox vaccine is preventive. Tetanus shots are preventive. Colonoscopies find what's already there. Anyway, it's not like we have any control over whether or not you eat a large pepperoni pizza every night, washed down with a 6-pack of beer, and then a few relaxing smokes. Nor can we prevent gallstones, broken ankles, cerebral aneurysms

aneurysms
or about 99% of the things that afflict people even if they all live like Dean Ornish in an isolation bubble. Healthy diet, a good night's sleep, exercise, don't smoke, watch your weight, and get lung cancer like non-smoker-vegetarian-yoga-enthusiast-transcendental-meditation-teacher-and-successful-actor/comedian Andy Kaufman, dead at age 35.
Do they think this will be like Boston Legal, where all the partners sit
around a conference table and discuss each case? How many of us call our
colleagues after every visit to discuss the patient? "I'm sorry, Dr.
Futznagle can't come to the phone to discuss Mrs. Balderdash. He's
already on the phone talking to Dr. Squigglemeyer and then he has to
return a call from Dr. Fussypants. Can he call you back next week after
he finishes returning last week's calls?"
Even the Europeans aren't that stupid. To really screw things up you
need the United States Congress, which seems to think that reinventing
the wheel by making a square wheel with a broken axle is the way to
decrease gas consumption.
Yes indeed, that's one way to do it.

Back to the Future??

(figure 1):  Short list of small ambulatory practices EHR.

 

I thought I would take a step back in time to when I was writing about EMRs, RHIOs and interoperability.  The roots of this blog were in the Riverside Health Information Organization. 

Time has evolved EMRs from a primitive form of data collection and storage to a more sophisticated form of data storage and collection.

EHRs now have had the benefit of time, and some longevity to develop and critique their short comings.  The results thus far show the front runners in the great race to automate and interoperate.  The above figure is from an "independent study" of Group One Health Source, sent to me in a private emailing by Andrea Biddle. 

(figure 2) Short list of large ambulatory practices.

The differences in these two charts is small and probably represents the different markets that vendors have chosen to target with their offerings.

What's in a Number??

Health Train Express January 5 2009

In which direction are we headed?  The WSJ reported that health care spending growth had diminished to 4.2%  in 2008.  the slowest rate of growth over the past forty-eight years.
Despite the slowdown, national health spending reached $2.3 trillion, or $7,681 per person, and the health care portion of gross domestic product (GDP) grew from 15.9 percent in 2007 to 16.2 percent in 2008. These developments reflect the general pattern that larger increases in the health spending share of GDP generally occur during or just after periods of economic recession.
This makes logical sense, since health needs never go into a recession….they continue no matter what the economy is. If the general economy outside of medicine contracts then health care expenses would represent a greater portion of the GDP.  What is critical here is that for the first time in 48 years the growth rate diminished from near  16.2% to 4.2%.  Let’s see how that sounds on  CNN, MSNBC and/or FOX News.

2010 + 5

It was a very nice quiet  New Years on the Health Train Express. Fill in anchors on the networks and cable 24 hour media events, and less about healthcare.

Congress will be back in  session very shortly and the fires will be stoked up.

A colleague of mine sent this to me. Common sense, common values, and a real friend to physicians. 

Mike Huckabee (click to go to media)

If this doesn't warm  your heart in this cold January week perhaps a raise in our reimbursements would.  We are in a world of negative reward.  We feel good if we stop the cuts, we think we have won a battle.

We all need to take the Mayo Clinic route.  Give up  Medicare.

Tomorrow I return to what I like most about medicine, Patient care.  The rest of it is there supposedly to help me do that  better. (not a reality)

WELCOME 2010

A place where no man has gone before.

This might be a timely metaphor from Star Trek.

A 'crack in the wall' as a result of proposed  health reform has already begun to form.  As reported in the Arizona Republic, Bloomberg News, and  The Health Care Blog, The well known and venerated name "MAYO CLINIC' in Glendale Arizona has announced that effective today, Januray 1, 2010 they will no longer accept Medicare for Primary care (formerly known as your family doctor).  While this only affects five physicians at that facility, Medicare reimbursement  for specialty care and hospitalization will continue to be accepted.

The amount patients will now have to pay for primary care will be about 1500 dollars/year.

Whether or not this is a 'trial balloon for Mayo will remain to be seen. 

This does not apply to private or employer based insurance plans.    It may also open a new market for private insurance plans to offer an option for primary care only coverage.

This of course radically affects the referrals to Mayo Clinic specialty care. It also shifts a considrable load to area doctors for primary care. It is not clear whether those patients who chose to go elsewhere will be able to be referred to Mayo for specialty care. Given the reputation of Mayo Clinic for "specialized care", this will  probably be the case.

My head hurts. Maybe it's my hangover???

HAPPY NEW YEAR from Health Train.

gml

Hospital Care and Social Media

 

Arguments about the validity of Health 2.0 are moot. It is here!! Hundreds of thousands of patients and providers use the format in advocacy groups, using facebook, twitter, blogs, and search engines.  Is Google a health 2.0 app?

 

The following story is well worth the read

 

THOUGHTS ON MEDICINE AND SOCIAL MEDIA (Regina Holliday)

 

On Wednesday, May 27, 2009 I met Dr. Ted Eytan. I was invited to present a patient and caregiver view of hospitalization at a small health 2.0 meeting. I saw Powerpoint presentations with bar charts and graphs. I sat patiently taking notes about the state of ehealth and social media. At around 3:15 I spoke. I described the horror of my husband being diagnosed with cancer and of terror of not being told what was going on. I spoke about the fight we had fought to get to get a copy of the medical record. I recounted the numerous times I had used the information in his record to improve his care. The record sat upon the table in a three inch thick binder. There was silence in the room. We were no longer speaking in the abstract about patients. They asked me to focus on what was the worst thing that had happened through this entire tragedy. I told them the worst thing we experienced was lack of access to my husband’s data.

 

LiveJournal Tags: health 2.0,facebook,twitter,ehealth collaborative,social media

Obamism

We are hearing different reasons why we must pass this health reform bill.  1. There is a crisis and if we don't pass the bill, we will go bankrupt (things are unsustainable). 

There are many hidden aspects to this bill, which is not being discussed in a transparent manner (which our esteemed President assured us.)"that things would be different in D.C. if he were elected"

2. If  the bill is passed costs will go up as well, including increases in premiums of a significant amount to cover the new insured,, who were previously uninsurable, or excluded to due pre-existing conditions.

3. Additional taxes will go into effect several  years before any benefits or changes will be made to coverage.

"Quick, pass the bill before anyone can read it and really understand the profound effect it will have not only on health care, but every business, and person who is insured. "What will be the ripple effect on health care costs, provider availability, and hospital survival? 

What's In A Name

THE PUBLIC OPTION 

Let's think of some titles that will be more acceptable to the approximate 50% of voters who do not want a public option.

1. Alternative integrated universal choice for Health.

2..National Public Health, Inc. (NPH)

3.  United Stated Federal Health Reserve USFR)

4. Federal Health Insurance Bank (FHIB)

5. U.S. Health Stimulus Choice (also known as USHC certified)

6. Federal United Care Combine (also known as FUCC) (sounds like Fuc@)

Or let's allow patients to 'Opt-out of the Public Option. This would be done on a state wide basis rather than as individuals. Depending on which state you live in.  This great idea comes from those two Senators Reid and Pelosi who must smoke something for breakfast that is grown in the fields of either Afghanistan or Northern California.

Plans #1 through #4  could be funded by donations from patients who "care" for only pennies a day.

For those who want the public option....I hope you will like what you get...it won't be pretty.  If you think you can't find swine flu now, when you need it, then consider that this is typical of any government program.  The idea that the federal government is going to contract with private insurers copies what it does in most other areas of defense, manufacturing of medications such as vaccines (CDC), NASA, and others).  They cannot do the job themselves, and contract it out to others who are either not supervised or unable to perform.

Our government easily promises what it cannot or will not deliver. The war on cancer, the war on drugs.

Yes, a a physician I know it is a disgusting fact that there are many uninsured needy patients who don't get health care. I also know that programs such as medicaid will pay for a surgery, but not the necessary post op physical therapy....why? Because the states are fearful that everyone on Medi-caid will run down and sign up for chiro-massage or manipulation. That philosophy runs rampant in most state and/or federal programs.

Government programs are always trying to make a brick float.

GML