HEALTH TRAIN EXPRESS Mission: To promulgate health education across the internet: Follow or subscribe to Health Train Express as well as Digital Health Space for all the updates for health policy, reform, public health issues. Health Train Express is published several times a week.Subscribe and receive an email alert each time it is published. Health Train Express has been published since 2006.
The '” boys “ over at The Healing Blade and Nerdcore Learning bring new multimedia strategy to the healing arts.
Turn on your wide screen HDTV and get your controllers ready!
The Butcher does not have to code, the surgeon does, butcher does not need malpractice coverage, no CME, not on call, does not need hospital privileges. If you like to cut, be a butcher.
Hospital Seismic Safety Report February 2010
We all know about the seismic risks to buildings in California, including health care facilities. The California Healthline recently reported the summary information available as of November 6, 2010.
Unfortunately, although mandates for seismic retrofit was established many years ago, the vast majority of hospitals have not been officially evaluated for potential collapse in a major seismic event.
California does not require hospitals to determine their collapse risks, but facilities can do so voluntarily. Hospitals also do not need to determine collapse risks for each of their individual facilities, making it difficult for some hospitals to determine which building to retrofit first.
Efforts To Assess Risk
In 2002, California compiled a list of 1,100 hospitals that could pose a risk of collapse during an earthquake. Of those, the state conducted complex evaluations of 370 hospital buildings and determined that 280 facilities had low enough collapse risks to qualify for the 2030 seismic safety deadline.
State authorities now are focusing on about 700 hospital buildings that were placed in the highest-risk category.
Of those, the state has determined collapse risks for only 90 facilities. Fourteen of those 90 facilities have been assigned collapse risks of between 10% and 32%, far higher than the 1.2% collapse risk that officials deemed reasonably safe.
A map showing the location of hospitals with buildings that have a 10 to 32 percent chance of collapsing in an earthquake. Click on this link to see more information about the 14 buildings located at these hospitals.
What's left are about 700 hospital buildings in the highest-risk category that still face deadlines to make changes. Officials only know the collapse risk for about 90 of those buildings, which range from .75 to 32 percent.
Way back in the mid 20th century when I graduated from George Washington University with an M.D. degree I imagined that I had “arrived”. I remember my classmates selecting different specialties and eventually going off to clinical training. I could not imagine doing anything other than clinical work, and perhaps dabbling in some clinical research. Some of my friends were studying ‘epidemiology’ and a new field ‘public health’. At that time, it mostly was dedicated to ‘epidemics’, vaccinations, preventive medicine, and things that to me did not really involved patient care.
Turn the page, 50 or 60 years. This specialty has morphed into having an MPH (Masters in Public Health), and perhaps an MBA in health administration.. Previously these professionals had little to do with your clinical practice on a daily basis. Now these people are the groundbreakers, movers and shakers throughout the medical world in which we all practice.
My school is now known as “ George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences. The previous formal division of Medical Clinical pursuits from allied health and health business has become blurred at the educational level. This blurring of distinction has also occurred in the clinical world with PAs. NPs, Advanced Degree nursing specialties and the like.
As a delayed and recent student of this field , and as a result of my blogging research I see that the topography has changed drastically. Previously treated with disdain, MPHs, and MBAs, and MHAs increasingly have invaded our insular clinical world. Many health reformers and policy makers delved deep into the social psychology of medical practice, medical group organization, quality measures, and even reimbursements. All of this has evolved into an environment of MPHs having a huge influence on governmental policy makers. Many MPHs have evolved into a new specialty of Political Influence. Many practice medicine, not by treating patients or treating diseases, but by spreadsheets, algorithms, and formulating treating diseases from 40,000 feet….far removed from the implications of their edicts.
The flack is coming from we clinicians on the ground.
Gee, I wish I had gotten that MPH.
For Ophthalmology Times:
The past year has seen a rapid acceleration and implementation of electronic medical records in medical practices. While some ophthalmologists long ago installed EMR it was for the reason of establishing a reliable medical record, and also to improve the efficiency of their practices, improve reimbursement and eliminate paper. Most ophthalmologists lagged in EMR usage due to lack of affordable solutions and the fear of disruptive technology.
During the second and rapid phase of adoption of new technology we have gone beyond 'early adopters', and the remainder of ophthalmology is adopting for political/financial incentives or social influence. Social influence plays a large role in the selection process of the EMR. Ophthalmologists and many physicians rely upon social medical peers for their demonstrations and testimonials regarding EMRs.
Like it or not in the next two years most of us will have adopted EMR and HIE (health information exchange), and not for just financial reasons. Instead of investing in that 4th generation OCT, or Wave front analyzer you will opt to buy an EMR, for which you will be at least partially reimbursed. (and most likely more than a charge for an OCT or Wave front calculation. The smart money will go toward EMRs. In most specialties the reimbursements are being bundled, and the ROI or recapture of investment will be much less than the incentive for purchasing an EMR.
We will increasingly see that referral sources require electronic communication with specialists, and will expect consultation reports to be sent electronically, via the health information network(s). This will take some time to establish, but it is inevitable.
Like my analogy on the Health Train Express....move over or get run over! It is a bit like the negative effect of not adopting a disruptive technology. By not adopting a growing technology you will be at a disadvantage in the market place, which will more than disrupt your practice than if you had adopted EMR.
John Hamlaka MD, who is the CIO at Harvard makes the following observations.
“The ONC is concerned about the success of meaningful use Stage 1, “and if it turns out much of America can’t achieve meaningful use Stage 1, then more rigorous criteria are not a good idea,” he said. The ONC is expected to further refine the requirements and do a second-quarter 2011 checkpoint to see how it’s going.
Stage 1 programs start in January, attestation will begin in April, and the first incentive dollars will be awarded in May, Halamka said. “The implication for many of us is that you better make sure you have the capacity to do all these quality measures January through March, 2011.
“In some ways, quality measures as they exist are process measures,” said John D. Halamka, MD, during his closing keynote HIMSS Virtual Conference presentation.
Stage 2 will see the introduction of outcomes orientation, and Stage 3 will move to outcome measures, which measure the wellness of a patient instead of how many tests were ordered for a given patient, said Halamka, an emergency room physician and CIO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, chair of the U.S. Healthcare IT Standards Panel (HITSP) and co-chair of the
Did I miss my station?
I’ve been riding the Health Train Express for several years. I seem to have missed many stops and find myself at the end of the road. Somewhere in between I have vague recollection of stops along the way, SGR, HMO, PPO, IPA, PQRI, ARHQ, CMS, HITECH, PACA,NHIN, HIE. EMR, RHIO,HHS.
What does it all mean?
Jane M. Orient, M.D., is an On Air contributor speaking on Healthcare Reform. Dr. Orient has appeared on NBC, MSNBC, ABC and many major broadcast venues throughout the US, as well and her Op-eds have been printed in hundreds of local and international newspapers, magazines and followed on major blogs. She has been in solo practice of general internal medicine since 1981 and is a clinical lecturer in medicine at the University of Arizona College of Medicine. She received her undergraduate degrees in chemistry and mathematics from the University of Arizona, and her M.D. from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons. She is the author of Sapira’s Art and Science of Bedside Diagnosis; the fourth edition has just been published by Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. She also authored YOUR Doctor Is Not In: Healthy Skepticism about National Health Care, published by Crown. She is the executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a voice for patients’ and physicians’ independence since 1943. Complete curriculum vitae posted at www.drjaneorient.com. Additional information on health-related issues: www.aapsonline.org and www.takebackmedicine.com
Congress handed the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) some assumptions, the computers came up with the mix of adjustments needed to give a magic number under $1 trillion in 10 years, and the “Affordable Care Act” (ACA
Numbers are thrown about—but where’s a spreadsheet of the money flows? The President couldn’t exercise a line-item veto even if he had one because there aren’t any line items. For example, how can you budget for each of the new bureaucracies if you don’t even know exactly how many there are (159—more or less)? And are they counted in the $1 trillion cost?
This article by Dr Orient succinctly elaborates the incompetence of the ACA (Affordable Care Act) as she writes in The Health Care Blog. It seems to have been written by a legal intern skilled at legalese without thought about a strategy for implementation. Each section is written with the assumption and without regard for the effects of a prior change in the health care system.
Her summation is chilling, and should be read by every American and our congressional representatives, who should have read the bill before voting it’s approval.
PACA needs to be repealed and/or amended drastically. Let’s not give up and roll over. Change is what he wanted, and change is what we will give Obama.
Todays’ post is a potpourri of health related blogs.
by Vijay
Here we are one day post election. It was reported that 1.6 billion dollars was spent for the benefit of politicians and free spending businesses, lobbyists, and some well meaning citizens who buy into their lies, promises and grandiose ideology and plans for the republic. No doubt many of these companies, and individuals had some self serving sinister motives. Campaign financing laws are easily thwarted, to attain these levels of spending a mid-term election. There is a great deal of American Wealth at stake, your wealth as our politicians fight to obtain your money for their purposes, without regard as to whom elected them or pay their salaries. Media companies flourish from our largesse, disseminating half trues, and opinion, competing for advertising dollars and ratings.
“Take back our country” should be re-stated as “Take back our Money”
I have always been a moderate, paid taxes, contributing as much as I could when I was relatively well off, employing ten people, accountants, attorneys, insurance companies, not only for malpractice, but liability, disability, health insurance and more. I fueled several medical technology companies for diagnostic and surgical equipment as equipment became obsolete every five years, or less. I created a ten year business plan investing a significant amount in equipment with a depreciation plan.
All of my planning and budgeting were sabotaged by the ‘threat of inflation’ and the projected insolvency of Medicare. During the late 1980s and early 1990s a plan was developed by some ‘hidden magical gurus of health care planning’ located within the D.C. Beltway. HMOs, IPAs, Managed Care, PPOs and other eponyms were launched with the objective and promise of ‘cost containment’.
It is difficult to prove a negative but one naturally questions what would have occurred if these changes did not occur. Medical care and the quality of care suffered greatly, administrative expenses soared with the multiple tiers of billing, review and organizational expense. New positions were created for ‘executive directors’, added administrative expense and consultants in management. Most patients and physicians despised the system.
We were paid less, buying into the concept of ‘withholds’ which would be paid back if doctors managed well and thereby receive a rebate. I witnessed one of our organizations hi-jacked by our board, using our funds to capitalize the organization to sell it to Aetna’ managed care plan. This company and many others like it removed much of our income which formerly covered operating expenses and allowed for charity care for the uninsured, both in our private offices and hospitals. Whether there were cost savings remains very much open to question. Many of these organizations merged, failed or became insolvent.
The true definition of insanity is to repeatedly do the same thing, resulting in a bad outcome and then repeat it expecting a different outcome.
Our entire medical system has been manipulated and re-organized with devastating outcomes, the number of uninsured has soared, as government has become more involved in the process. Rest assured our elected officials will fail to control their mandates for ‘Obama Care’. That is evident from the law they passed without reading or understanding the full implication of the law. They certainly did not plan the secondary or tertiary effects of the law and how insurers, employers and patients would “gain the system.”
Think about this…40 million citizens (and perhaps a fair number of undocumented aliens receive food stamps to survive. Some of them drive gas guzzling SUVs which have become less expensive to buy because others cannot afford these vehicles to drive to and from work any longer. (Another unintended consequence of a well meaning mandate for fuel economy and “green”. So the poor non working and some disabled can afford better things that hard working employed who have significant other cost of living expenses from their ‘declining spendable income.”
Not mentioned is the tremendous increase in cost of regulating and enforcement of these new laws.
While you and I have little time to devote to being a ‘watchdog’ over administrators , politicians, we are paying their salaries to got to meetings to plan our destruction, not only of the earners but the people’s freedoms who receive the ‘rearrangement’ and re-distribution of your property and wealth.
The election illustrates that physicians themselves are still trusted by the people. Several physicians, one of whom is Rand Paul, MD (an ophthalmologist) were elected to the U.S. Senate. And despite being ridiculed by other candidates, and even some physicians his message rang true for the people of Kentucky.
The forgers of our constitution were very brilliant in codifying our country’s foundational concepts. Those concepts brought us through many crises, and it should not be decimated by “ convenience to businesses, decision makers, nor Presidents. It has already been significantly degraded and is in danger of being destroyed.
Our republic was formed with the ability to reform itself through legal process codified in the US. Constitution. Our peaceful transition of ruling and power is peaceful despite significant and deeply entrenched diverse values of our peoples.
As long as these values of our legal citizens are respected as we move forward things should continue to flourish despite our current
difficulties. The Constitution was created for our present contingencies as an eternal document to be built upon ,just as the Magna Carta, and the Bill of Rights have served as part of our republic.
My friend and buddy for Halloween night.
If it doesn’t work out, there is always this,
Happy Goblins !!
A Haunting I will go
Stanford University
The San Jose Mercury News Reports,
“Stanford University opens
new stem cell building,
bucking federal
restrictions”
Across the nation, embryonic stem cells live in legal
limbo, their fate uncertain with a lawsuit challenging
public funding for research.
But they are cherished celebrities at Stanford
University's School of Medicine, which on
Wednesday inaugurated a new home for them at the
Lorry I. Lokey Stem Cell Research Building, now the
largest stem cell facility in the nation.
"The stem cell revolution has been launched in
California,"
Bob Klein of the California Institute for
Regenerative Medicine declared at the afternoon
ceremony. After his son was diagnosed with
diabetes and his mother with Alzheimer's, Klein w
rote the language for Proposition 71, which
cleared the way for such research in California.
"In this fine facility, research is insulated from federal influence. Science is served by patients, not politics."
The cells, which will contribute to pioneering
research, remained upstairs in a high-security lab
during the afternoon pageantry. They live in flat
plastic dishes, within warm incubators where they
eat nutrient-rich broth -- and multiply by the
minute.
"They are very, very, very precious," said research
manager Vittorio Sebastiano, who is responsible for
the well-being of the 10 million to 100 million cells,
a diverse collection of both innocents and killers.
Many are derived from donated embryos; others
come from tissues of sick or dying patients.
He handles each dish carefully, and only briefly,
wearing plastic gloves to
avoid contamination. He monitors their health by
the color of the pH-sensitive broth, which shifts
from pink to purple or yellow with any change in the
cells' conditions.
Until recently, these cells were scattered in
individual labs, some off campus.
To keep them undisturbed and centrally located
during the chaos of construction and lab relocation,
Stanford collected the cells and put them together in
one small room, which was completed early, at the
new site. The dozens of dishes were loaded into
Styrofoam boxes -- kept warm by bottles of heated
water -- then quickly driven across campus and
moved to the new incubators.
Meanwhile, lab equipment -- ranging from pipettes
to centrifuges -- has been shipped to the new site.
The Lokey Building's 200,000 square feet of lab
space will serve 500 people and 33 different
research projects.
Bringing all the researchers under one roof will
make it easier for them to collaborate while sharing
expensive equipment and technical support.
Located so close to Stanford Hospital, doctors can
treat patients and then walk to their labs within
minutes. The new building also offers 60 temporary
"hotel" rooms for researchers from as far away as
Germany and Singapore, contributing valuable
cross-pollination of ideas.
"All the real experts in California in stem cell
biology are right here, together, in this building,"
said Sebastiano, a developmental biologist.
Meanwhile, scientists outside California endure a
legal roller coaster, as a lawsuit challenging federal
funding of this research wends its way through the
judicial system. At stake are an estimated 1,300
jobs, as well as more than $200 million in grants
from the National Institutes of Health that support
more than 200 projects.
The study of embryonic stem cells has been subject
to religious objections and was limited for years by
the Bush administration. The Obama administration
lifted the limits, but a lawsuit has left the field more
restricted than ever. In August, Chief Judge Royce C.
Lamberth, of Federal District Court for the District of
Columbia, issued an injunction blocking research.
The ruling is now being appealed.
The Stanford effort, in contrast, is supported by $44
million in state funding from the California Institute
for Regenerative Medicine, created by voter approval
of Proposition 71 in 2004. An additional $75
million was donated by Stanford alumnus Lorry I.
Lokey, founder of Business Wire. The remainder of
the $200 million budget was raised through private
donations and university resources.
Scientists there also teach. Already 100 students,
postdoctoral fellows, physicians and researchers --
from campuses including San Jose State, UC Santa
Cruz and UCLA -- have learned how to derive and
care for stem cells.
The new facility will expand this training program
-- and perhaps offer the first Ph.D. program in cell
biology in the country.
"It's brilliant," said Sebastiano. "It's not a matter of
research. It's a matter of how to pass the knowledge
of this research to a new generation of scientists."
Throughout the turmoil, the cells continue to grow.
Some of the embryo-derived cells have matured into
tiny heart cells, and beat in unison. Scientists hope
to build tissue to patch up damaged hearts, create
insulin-producing cells for diabetics or heal the
damaged spinal columns of quadriplegics.
Other cells do not come from embryos -- they are
mature cells donated by patients.
Ravi Dasgupta became the first person ever to receive a stem cell transplant.
Some cause cystic fibrosis; others, sickle cell
disease. One dish holds skin cells from patients
with epidermolysis bullosa, a rare and life-
threatening blistering disease of the skin.
In the future, as the Lokey building fills, they will be
joined by legions of others, causing diseases as
diverse as cancer to Parkinson's disease -- a virtual
Noah's Ark of cell samples.
Lokey, a jovial 83-year-old, said he was excited by
the potential of stem cells to improve health and
extend longevity.
"This life," he told the crowd, "is too rewarding, and
good, to leave early."
There are many dedicated to advancing hope for cures. We should not despair about the present political morass . We shall overcome.
is now available for the cost of an email to me requesting it. This edition covers January 2010 through October 26, 2010. It is in a pdf format.
Get one quickly…THEY WILL GO FAST. The first 100 will also get a free picture of the author.
Wait too long, and this may happen.
It’s nice to honor someone before they pass away and that is the subject of this mornings’ blog.
I first met her in 2003 or 2004. I don’t really remember the exact year. It was in a time when I did not know someone like her even existed.
For me it was an invigorating change in semi-retirement. She would fill many hours of each day.
She was a breath of fresh air in my life, however at times I did not know how to communicate with her, and she often misunderstood my intentions.
She was a ‘new age being’, one who many others also discovered. However when ever I knocked on her door, I would only have to whisper secret words and she would invite me in once again. She rarely tired of my visits, she primped for my visits, and at times would not let me visit as she dressed in some new attire for my pleasure. During my days I would check on her ,often unbelieving when I found her wanting my attention, even though she was occupied with others.
Our relationship was passionate as I awoke each morning to sample her offerings. I admit gradually she became my connection with the world.
Over the course of the last several years, I admit I became fickle, seeking to satisfy my needs with others who had adopted her fresh and seductive ways Others took her best features and adopted her ‘fashion into new garments and like with an older woman, her admirers and courtiers were attracted to their new muses.
I also sadly developed new relationships with the come-latlies and found it more difficult to be with her. I was an admitted adulter who found time short at I wooed others throughout my day, however she remained my morning sunrise as I awoke each day.
Last week I heard the news that she only had several more weeks to live. I rushed to her and she had left me a message that what I had heard was true. She would be gone by the end of the month. In her own amicable way (as she had done all her) life she offered to help me make the transition to new friends. I had loved how she gathered the rest of my friends. She was a social butterfly. I followed her lead and made many new friends, forming a close group who will go on in her absence. We all contributed to her passing with our fickle nature.
I don’t know what our group plans to do when she passes. She was unique, and insular, even while very sociable, choosing to stand alone, not attaching herself to another form of entertainment. Some of us have found other lovers. For me,although she showed her age, she is still my morning cup of tea. Will there be a ‘celebration for her beginning’ or will she pass quietly into the night? The younger generation in a short time will not remember her or the important role she played in our lives.
Perhaps some of you will know of whom I speak. You can still visit her here. If you have been with her she always recognized you with the right words.
Be still, old friend knowing that you changed all our lives.
GML
This is the new buzz word sweeping through the MBA, MHA, and HHS.
So, who is accountable to whom, and what?
There are the usual number of talking heads including CEOs of large medical groups, the head of the California Association of Physician Groups. Notably absent is the California Medical Association, which represents physicians. It makes me wonder if CMA was even invited…
If you or your group wish to present at the next National Meeting You can apply here:
Know your ‘enemy’ make them your friends, be aware and make yourselves heard !!
Health Train will be stopping twice a day to publish an article in the morning and then in the evening. Don’t forget to check twice each day. The AM edition will cover scientific breakthroughs both in basic science and clinical science as well as HIT which will impact how medicine will be practiced in the 21st century. The PM edition will continue to cover HIT and policy reform as well as appropriate humorous subjects.
This morning the train stops briefly to review the messages at Health 2.0, just held the past week in San Francisco.
The street is big on all the flurry and buzz about medicine and HIT. Although I have never attended a Health 2.0 shout out,
I have managed to follow them on the web. Without judging the merits of each presentation, or idea there are substantial numbers of entrepreneurs betting their wallets and time on these developments. We as physicians will gain much from these presentations, if we advise our patients to consider these options. Most of them are “consumer-centric” and their success will largely depend upon patient acceptance. Recent market surveys indicate wider acceptance and use of the resources. Videos have been published from the recent gathering of minds.
I enjoyed this one in particular. Regina Holiday attended the meeting and created a wonderful summary in paint of the conference and what it represented. Have a look !
