Go Daddy, Go
HEALTH TRAIN EXPRESS Mission: To promulgate health education across the internet: Follow or subscribe to Health Train Express as well as Digital Health Space for all the updates for health policy, reform, public health issues. Health Train Express is published several times a week.Subscribe and receive an email alert each time it is published. Health Train Express has been published since 2006.
Friday, March 11, 2011
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
More Butterfly Effect
The Laws of Unintended Consequences, or Whose Money is it Anyway?
There are provisions in the health care bill which paradoxically, and perhaps predictably increase the cost of Rxes and add additional burdens to the doctor.
Patients are demanding doctors' orders for over-the-counter products because of a provision in the health-care overhaul that slipped past nearly everyone's radar. It says people who want a tax break to buy such items with what's known as flexible-spending accounts need to get a prescription first.
The result is that Americans are visiting their doctors before making a trip to the drugstore, hoping their physician will help them out by writing the prescription. The new requirements create not only an added burden for doctors, but also new complications for retailers and pharmacies.
"It drives up the cost of health care as opposed to reducing it," says Dr.Chung, who rejected much of a 10-item request from a mother of four that included pain relievers and children's cold medicine.
Some doctors, irked by the paperwork and worried about lawsuits, are balking at writing the new prescriptions. Pharmacists and retailers say the changes mean they have to apply a personalized label on some 15,000 different everyday products for customers paying with certain debit cards.
The Unintended Consequences of Hasty and Poorly Thought out Legislation
Retailers and pharmacies, meanwhile, say another aspect of the change caught them flat-footed. Many flexible-spending accounts come with a debit card, making it easy for consumers to draw down the money in the accounts when they shop at a pharmacy. But under the original IRS guidance, people couldn't use those cards for the prescribed over-the-counter medications.
An industry group representing Wal-Mart, CVS Caremark Corp., Visa Inc. and other large corporations warned that could temporarily halt use of the debit cards for any pharmacy purchase. The IRS eventually decided the cards could be used—as long as the pharmacist labels and processes the over-the-counter item exactly like a prescription.
That had another unintended effect. Thousands of over-the-counter products now must pass behind the pharmacist's counter when the customer pays with the special debit card.
Doctors are also concerned about malpractice lawsuits, since a prescription potentially puts them on the hook for any problems a patient suffers from over-the-counter drugs.
Some malpractice insurers are urging doctors not to write any prescription without seeing the patient in person, says Lawrence Smarr, president of the Physician Insurers Association of America, which represents malpractice insurance providers.
The over-the-counter provision isn't the only part of the health-care law that has defied expectations.
Health-policy experts predicted that new insurance pools for high-risk patients would attract so many expensive enrollees that funding would be quickly exhausted. In fact, enrollment is running at just 6% of expectations, partly because of high premiums.
A provision preventing insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing health conditions prompted insurers in dozens of states to stop selling child-only policies altogether.
And a piece of the law designed to centralize patient care by encouraging health-care providers to collaborate is running into antitrust concerns from regulators.
Much of the health law, which passed last year despite overwhelming opposition by Republicans, doesn't take effect until 2014. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has projected that an additional 32 million Americans will get insurance, and the law has already extended tax credits to small businesses for buying insurance and allowed many parents to keep their children on their health plan until their 26th birthday.
But opponents say it costs too much and gives the federal government too much control over health care.
As that larger battle plays out, the over-the-counter provision is emerging as a top target for change. Republicans in both the House and Senate have introduced legislation to repeal it and return to the old system. The largest chain drugstore lobbying group is backing the effort, arguing that the new rules are inefficient and limit access to the medicines.
Asked whether she would support such legislation, Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of Health and Human Services, said: "I'd take a look at it."
Tax breaks for over-the-counter drugs date to 2003, as popular drugs like the allergy medicine Claritin began switching to over-the-counter status. The Internal Revenue Service loosened the rules on flexible-spending accounts so consumers could use them to buy thousands of nonprescription medications. The tax-free dollars can also go for insurance co-payments, eyeglasses and other out-of-pocket health costs.
Critics say the accounts encourage overconsumption of medical services. Since consumers typically must forfeit unused funds by year's end, they often ended up scrambling in December to drain their funds by loading up on aspirin, antacid and the like.
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Dr Berwick’s Numbers are Almost In
In a report from Katherine Hobson of the Wall Street Journal, She describes,
“The road ahead looks so difficult that some Democrats are joining Republicans in calling for a new nominee, The New York Times reports. It’s a matter of math; 42 Republicans have already urged President Obama to pick someone else, and by voting accordingly, they could block confirmation, the paper says. A White House spokesman tells the NYT the nomination won’t be withdrawn and praised Berwick’s performance thus far.”
It seems there will be another protracted confrontation between congress with President Obama. Obama appears to be a one man show dedicated to his getting his way with some questionable tactics e
It is clear that Obama chose Berwick because of their intertwined motivation to re-distribute the wealth and the health of the nation.
The Times reports Berwick’s principal deputy, Marilyn Tavenner, would be more acceptable to Republicans and is a potential replacement.
Readers who wish to learn more about Don Berwick M.D may go link to several past Health Train Express Articles:
I agree with some of the utopian ideals that Dr Berwick espouses, however it is obvious that neither side has drilled down on the impact of true costs to patients, employers, or care providers The bureaucracy will be stultify everyone ...
Dr Price Tears into Don Berwick (CMS)..Feb 10, 2011…A live web video from the hearing on Health Reform Repeal Legislation. Web Video Live. image. Rep. Tim Price MD. You listen, you decide, but a must view for everyone.
Health Train Express: Foreign Perspective on US Health Economics Feb 25, 2011……Today we are faced with demagogues in health care, the Sebelius', the Berwick's, the health care foundations, and all those wannabees who are sabotaging health care with politically correct statements. They come, they go at the end of ...
Observations Hard to believe whoever was in charge of this let it slip through. Well intentioned but poorly implemented. The Health Care Blog also has a post today by Micihael Millenson. Thanks to him. I will write Czar Berwick about this one. ..
Which Planet am I on? ….Jan 21, 2011 .. running in the opposite direction from the US Health Reform. I wonder what Dr Berwick is thinking now? del.icio.us Tags: NHS,Andrew Lansley,UK Health system,Primary care trusts,acountable care.
Are Doctors lurking, or lurching?….Dec 30, 2010….Donald Berwick, explains, "Traditional medical ethics, based on the doctor-patient dyad must be reformulated...The primary function of regulation in health care, especially as it affects the quality of medical care, is to constrain ...
The IHI Open School…Dec 25, 2010…Mention the name 'Don Berwick' and some physicians have a gut-wrenching feeling about him. He is the focal point and lightening rod as head of CMS due to his statements about the American Health System. ...
A Good Guy or a Bad Guy?….Don Berwick is a controversial candidate for being the head of the Medicare (CMS) system. The name change several years ago from Medicare to CMS (Center for Medicare,Medicaid Services) was a subtle. beginning for the projected changes ….
Re-distribute the Wealth…Jul 09, 2010….Essentially Don Berwick has become the 'lap-dog' for the socialist agenda of Barak Obama. Dr. Berwick has been a respected member and head of many organizations that are held in high esteem by the government for advice.
Health Reform in the NHS vs.The US…Aug 24, 2010…The UKs NHS system is running away from itself as fast as Obama and Berwick are running toward an obsolete model. From the BBC News Online today,. image. Hospitals are to be set free from central control
Dec 05, 2010
Dec 05, 2010
Unfortunately Don Berwick, the present head of CMS totally ignores this feature of the NHS. The NHS system has not been self correcting due to it's massive bureaucracy and inertial guidance system. This is typical of government. ...
What tha !?…Jul 27, 2010…Seems like Don Berwick was preaching to the wrong choir several months ago when he addressed an audience in the UK. Today, The New York Times announced,. LONDON — Perhaps the only consistent thing about Britain's socialized health care ...
Monday, March 7, 2011
The Berwick Boondogle
This post is highly opinionated and biased, the opinions are solely those of the author.
Dr. Berwick, a respected academic pediatrician from Harvard and the President of the well known Institute of Medicine was appointed by President Barak Obama hastily without congressional confirmation hearings. Berwick, who undoubtedly is a smart physician, but naïve about politics,and one who has misread his national colleagues opinions on health care hails from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, where all intelligent life exists only within the confines of route 128 (the Boston Beltway). Those who live inside Route 128 knows what is best for all of medicine, and health in the United States. Harvard, the beacon of light in medicine and science seeds the country, and universities with professors, teachers and sends leaders in academic medicine and many other disciplines throughout the United States and the rest of the world.
Dr. Berwick fell on his sword with the following speech given at the NHS last year, just prior to his appointment by Obama.
Don Berwick MD speaks at the NHS
So it was a big surprise (to Obama) when Berwick received little support from the grass roots of medicine, who care for the electorate.
There was a rather humorous incident the other day at a National Journal event with Don Berwick, the man who President Obama hailed as being at the forefront of introducing “innovative technologies” into health care reform.
“Withdrawing Dr. Berwick’s nomination would be a positive first step in rebuilding the trust of the American people. The occupant of this important position, which affects the health care of so many Americans on a daily basis, requires an individual with the appropriate experience and management ability. Our seniors and those who rely on Medicaid deserve no less,” the Senators write.
While Dr. Berwick has been renominated for the position, as Head of CMS, for which he was a recess appointee last year, no hearings have been scheduled yet regarding his nomination.
Friday, March 4, 2011
Health Care EMR & The Cloud
Healthcare, EMR and the Cloud
The Health Train Express exits the tunnel of meaningful use into the cloud.
The future for digitization of health records is cloudy.
This next decade will see a transition from client-server to solutions based in the cloud. The cloud is the virtual space located on a powerful server at a distant location.
It will facilitate adoption of more robust EMR applications and eventually serve as the ultimate health information exchange.
Rather than having expensive hardware and software at your office, requiring expensive maintenance and upgrades the applications and data are hosted at facilities designed as large enterprise secure sites.
Security is no more an issue than that for any present applications, and in most cases, better.
Many physicians are uneasy with patient databases off site, and concerned with HIPAA regulations in their own offices. The burden for insuring security will be placed squarely upon vendors.
The likelihood of cloud computer solutions increasing for business and healthcare is increased as large enterprise hardware vendors such as Dell acquire ASAP software, Everdream (provider of SaaS software solutions and remote-service management), Network Storage Co., Exanet, Ocarina Networks,Boom (SaaS), Apple, and many others have invested in building or acquiring large data centers.
Hewlett Packard purchased EDS (Ross Perot) to form HP Enterprise Services, which in addition to large data centers has much experience in healthcare solutions for health plans, government health, and life sciences.A leader in healthcare solutions
HP is the largest provider of healthcare information technology (IT) services in the world,encompassing the health plan, provider, life sciences, and government healthcare segments. Their solutions bring together unmatched experience, proven capabilities, domain expertise and industry knowledge, strong applications know-how, and practical innovation.
In 2009 Apple acquired property in Maiden, NC and began to build out a 500,000 square foot 1 billion dollar data center.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDXSSi1qStA
The cloud is the last to arrive in the healthcare space and EMR in particular. Several years ago vendors began to offer ASP solutions which are similar to but less efficient that true cloud platforms.
Now clear weather in the EMR space will be replaced by clouds.
Other business spaces already use cloud solutions for many functions in CRM, Inventory, Process Management,
The functions, also known as SaaS (Software as a Service), are in operation and offered by Amazon, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and at the end of 2009 the largest ten companies in SaaS were: Tera, Netsuite,IBM,Joyent, VMware, Google, and Rackspace. And the winner is …..Amazon !
In 2010 Enomaly, GoGrid, and AT&T, and Microsoft Azure have emerged from the young additions to the cloud.
Competition in the cloud space involves the diversity of applications as well as response times. No one wants to sit and wait for a screen refresh while a patient sits in your examining room, or the receptionist and billers twiddle their thumbs (at your expense) waiting.
The basic robust hardware/software infrastructure is already present.
Health Train Predicts that it will take five years for this technology to evolve and mature. The overwhelming advantage of this computing power is affordability of advanced algorithms and solution analysis for diagnosis and treatment. EMR will approach the medical record with artificial intelligence .s It is green technology markedly reducing requirements for cooling, and energy for end users,
The feds, insurers, and CMS are doing the health system, doctors, patients, and ultimately the tax paying public a great disservice with pushing for meaningful use, premature incentives with unrealistic time frames that will cost us all in the long run.
For those us who have implemented a system, so be it. Wait five years, at which time your system will be obsolete, and you will be faced with a major upgrade expense………consider a switch to the cloud……And for the rest of us, hold off, wait and do not be precipitated investing into already dated technology. IT advisory panels have recommended that CMS modify stages II and III definitions for meaningful use.
The eHealth Initiative recently sent a comment letter to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT, expressing concern about the proposed timelines for Stage 2 of the meaningful use program, Health Data Management reports.
Under the 2009 federal economic stimulus package, health care providers who demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHRs can qualify for incentive payments through Medicare and Medicaid.
The letter argues that the regulatory timeline included in the proposed criteria for Stage 2 provides "an inadequate amount of time for eligible hospitals to follow an implementation and testing schedule," adding, "A rushed process could potentially affect patient care."
The group did not explicitly ask for ONC to delay the start of Stage 2, but instead asked federal officials to "address the issue of inconsistent timelines" for regulations and the start of Stage 2
Additional Recommendations
In its comment letter, the eHealth Initiative also called for greater focus on health information exchange in Stage 2 of the meaningful use program. According to the group, the proposed Stage 2 requirements continue to focus on EHRs and do not give health care providers enough flexibility to use health data exchange to demonstrate meaningful use.
In many cases users are already using cloud functionality, unknowingly with eRX prescribing via Surescripts either directly or via your EMR.
Thursday, March 3, 2011
International Health Day
The Health Train Express travels and becomes a global enterprise.
No, I am not going to talk about the World Health Organzation (WHO). This post is going to recognize respected and interested international Visitors on Health Train Express. I recently installed ‘Feedjit’, a tracking tool of visitors to THTE And here are where there are readers.
Amsterdam,Hyderabad,Moscow,Tordas,Pune,Maharashtra,Tarlac,Nairobi, Delhi,Bangaladore,Saskatoon,
Thanks for the visit !
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Participatory Medicine
There is a new eponym about to erupt in health care PM. which is short for Participatory Medicine.
Participatory medicine: A high-tech alliance with patients
Charles Smith M.D., who blogs at eDocBlog, tells a story,
Matthew Herper’s post about thalidomide treatment of Myeloma is a good example of how patients will contribute to medical knowledge in the future, and may form a cautionary tale for patients who get involved to this degree in formulating new treatment approaches.
I work with Bart Barlogie, MD, (quoted in the article as the physician who ran the first clinical trial of the use of thalidomide in treatment of Myeloma) who is an innovative clinician researcher who has extended the life of many patients with Myeloma with his treatment approaches. He is also treating my wife who was diagnosed three years ago with Waldenstrom's Macroglulinemia, a form of lymphoma that resembles Multiple Myeloma (she has responded very well to his treatment).
The fact that her husband pushed her physician to try a novel approach to try to save his life, and that it was tried (even though it didn’t work for him), is an example of what will happen increasingly in the “new world of
Participatory Medicine”.
He would undoubtedly be cheering with the knowledge that the treatment that helped him beat back his disease for over a decade was probably “discovered” by a patient who was practicing Participatory Medicine!
Participatory Medicine: Patients doing research, usually online, and taking the ideas into the medical arena. Get ready, it’s going to be a brand new world!
Dr Smith, I can’t disagree with your assessment, but this is not a new phenomenon, such as the new world order. It has been going on for decades as far as I know. I was exposed to this each day in my practice. PM is just a new eponym for an old process. I’m certain Dr. Smith already knew this, but gives it a new name to draw attention to this for patients.
What is different in 2011 is that doctors are much busier seeing larger numbers of patients, and face time is markedly reduced, so that patients must be encouraged and pro-active to ask questions that are directly focused on their own problem.
What is also different is the growing use of EMRs. In the past, physicians would adjust their examination (and history) on relevant answers or findings on the physical examination based on their knowledge base of information built on years of clinical experience. Much of the process was fast and unconscious, and based upon previous learning and experience, much as we all experience such as riding a bicycle.
The current generation of EMRs does not allow tree analysis of the history and examination, truncating the process into usable information. The physician or assistant is forced to enter much useless information.
What our current EMRs produce is an endless repetitive list of information, which may be more readable but is offset by the prodigious meaningless amount of data. Most of this information will never be read, again.
The amount of processing power would be awesome to develop the tree analysis to structure a meaningful history and physical examination,and. probably too expensive unless it was rendered in the ‘cloud’.
Technorati Tags: emr,participatory medicine
Sunday, February 27, 2011
Doctor, Do I Need This CT Scan ?
In a rather frightening statistic, it has been stated that anywhere from 1 in 250 to 1 in 80 patients who undergo CT scans will develop cancer. These are numbers extracted from studies in the U.K and U.S.A.
However these global statistics are almost meaningless for an individual patient, and exemplifies the idea that statistics can be manipulated easily to make a point or gain advantage.
For instance Spiral CT scans have resulted in early detection of lung cancer and a 20% reduction in death from lung cancer.
Certain CT scans can increase the radiation dose by a factor of 3X or more.
Having a CT - or CAT - scan puts patients at far greater risk of developing cancer than previously thought, scientists claim.
The radiation generated by the scans - an increasingly popular diagnostic tool - may trigger the disease in as many as one in 80 patients.
This is far higher than the often used figure of one in 1,000 - with women at particular risk as they are more sensitive to the effects of radiation.
Researchers now believe the dose of radiation delivered by a CT scan can vary wildly according to where on the body it is used.
In some cases, they suggest, a single scan can be the equivalent of 442 chest X-rays.
Unlike an MRI scan - which uses magnetic fields and radio waves and has no known harmful effects - a CT scan generates ionising radiation so each dose causes a slight increase in the lifetime risk of cancer.
The scans allow doctors to build detailed 3D images of internal organs, blood vessels, bones or tumours.
They were already known to carry a greater risk than ordinary X-rays, such as those used for breast screening, but the latest research suggests a bigger problem.
It found the dose of radiation received was larger than thought, although this varied according to the part of the body being scanned and the age and sex of the patient.
The researchers concluded there was an average 13-fold variation between the highest and lowest doses experienced by patients, says a report in the journal Archives Of Internal Medicine.
University of California Professor Rebecca Smith-Bindman, who led the study, said: 'The risk associated with obtaining a CT is routinely quoted as around one in 1,000 patients who undergo CT will get cancer.
'In our study, the risk of getting cancer in certain groups of patients for certain kinds of scans was as high as one in 80.'
The typical dose delivered by a single CT scan was the equivalent of 74 mammograms or 442 chest X-rays, the professor said.
Researchers reviewed 1,119 patients in San Francisco who had been scanned in three body areas - the head and neck, the chest, and the abdomen and pelvis.
The scientists then worked out the radiation dosage of each scan and estimated the associated lifetime risk of cancer.
A heart examination might involve three scans, looking at different phases of the pumping cycle.
Prof Smith-Bindman said: 'This increases the information that we can get from the CT procedure, but increases the radiation dose by a factor of three.'
They were already known to carry a greater risk than ordinary X-rays, such as those used for breast screening, but the latest research suggests a bigger problem.
It found the dose of radiation received was larger than thought, although this varied according to the part of the body being scanned and the age and sex of the patient.
The researchers concluded there was an average 13-fold variation between the highest and lowest doses experienced by patients, says a report in the journal Archives Of Internal Medicine.
The scientists then worked out the radiation dosage of each scan and estimated the associated lifetime risk of cancer.
She said doctors need to reduce unnecessary use of scans.
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Mike Leavitt: Health reform’s central flaw
Mike Levitt, the former Head of HHS reflects accurately what Congress has allowed in Obamacare. Among other observations he notes the following in his commentary in the Salt Lake Tribune.
It puts more power than is prudent in the hands of one person, and it is not an answer to our national health-care crisis.
Set Up to Fail…..Just say no, Katherine.
Mr. President, I am performing a “tooth level surveillance’ as instructed in Obama-care. I am sorry to report you are in violation of dental dictates.
Shortly after being appointed to the Cabinet in 2003, I sought the advice of one of my predecessors. He cautioned me to be prudent in exercising the considerable regulatory power Congress had granted these offices, noting: “The place has more power than a good person needs or a bad person ought to have.”
It puts more power than is prudent in the hands of one person, and it is not an answer to our national health-care crisis.
Examples of that astounding power include tooth-level surveillance. That’s in Section 4102 of the health reform law says, “The secretary shall develop oral healthcare components that shall include tooth-level surveillance.” It defines tooth-level surveillance as a clinical examination in which an examiner looks at each dental surface on each tooth in the mouth.
This determination is better done by a dentist.
There’s more: The health-reform law dictates that the secretary shall determine how drugs are dispensed at long-term care facilities, shall identify categories and classes of drugs that are of clinical concern and shall be permitted to use comparative-effectiveness research to determine coverage and reimbursements. The 2,700-page law has nearly 2,000 of these “the secretary shall” statements.
If I may, as a former HHS secretary, offer a suggestion to the current secretary, it would be this: Use these expanded discretionary powers to grant states and the private sector more flexibility and more autonomy. Competition, innovation and new models of providing care and expanding coverage are the only ways we will reverse the dangerous course of future health spending. That simply cannot be done from Washington.
Please read the article…..it will confirm what we all say.
Perhaps Mike Leavitt should return to HHS…
Friday, February 25, 2011
Foreign Perspective on US Health Economics
I write for a financial newsletter on Mergers and Acquisitions. The M&A market during the first two months of 2011 has been sizzling. And the world markets have been watching the U.S. closely. Goldman Sachs, fueled by bail-out bucks has fueled predatory acquisitions by huge IT internet social media concerns of startups and sizeable going concerns.
Foreign analysts,SVP Eric Paternoster gave a presentation at the 2010 Infosys Analyst meeting……about the Healthcare Economy in the United States.In health care, hospitals are merging to form large health systems. This movement is occurring because of realistic fear of governmental mandates to form ACOs and the necessary capitalization of digital transformation, new administrative requirements for reimbursement, and operational considerations about outcomes, quality improvement and fear of rampant destructive competition. Regulators are hot at work determining which mergers will cross the line of FTC regs. It’s a great time for lawyers.
The reality of the finances are that even if American Medicine is not nationalized, by defacto, large monopolistic organizations are blooming.
Physicians need to keep up with these seemingly non health related issues, because it will effect both small and large practices, alike. At the end of a given day, tired, exhausted, financially depleted, overwhelmed, discouraged and depressed physicians may just roll over and go with the flow. In the stream of daily activities of physicians, malpractice worry's, CME requirements, credentialing requirements patient care, Medicare worries, declining reimbursement, and the overall intrusion of insurance companies, demands for better outcomes, and general interference in their responsibilities for patient health and lives, who would not roll over, or change careers.
The malaise has trickled down to medical students, just beginning what used to be a privilege of authority granted only to those with ultimate responsibility for patient welfare. Today we are faced with demagogues in health care, the Sebelius’, the Berwick’s, the health care foundations, and all those wannabees who are sabotaging health care with politically correct statements. They come, they go at the end of the day we are left with the remains.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Message in a Bottle
UV Blockers May save your life, or at least from a scar.
News about Laser ID-ing Skin Cancers
New blog follower: Check out the Blog Friends Roll.-
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Over the Horizon
The very recent success of IBMs Watson Computer signals not only the beginning of advances in computer intelligence but the announcement that IBM is about to embark on disciplines such as healthcare. The one million dollar prize, which Watson earned playing Jeopardy for IBM, is being donated by IBM to a charity. Watson beat two of the show’s most successful and celebrated contestants – Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter – to win a $1 million grand prize that IBM donated to charity.However, the Watson experiment indicates how truly important artificial intelligence and natural language processing can be for all kinds of business uses, including health care, law, call centers and a lot more.
IBM created Watson as part of the company’s effort to help business make sense of the explosion of data. Watson can analyze the meaning and context of human language and rapidly process information to find more precise answers to questions posed in natural language. IBM maintains that this holds enormous potential to transform how computers help people accomplish tasks in business, communities and their personal lives.
For you techno-geeks the hardware looked like this:
10 racks (about 90) of IBM Power 750 servers with 2880 Power7 cores capable of running at 80 teraflops, 500 GB per second on-chip bandwidth, a 10 GB Ethernet network, 15 terabytes of memory and 20 TBs of clustered disk storage. Watson evaluated the equivalent of 200 million pages of content – or about 1 million books’ worth – written in natural human
The research and technology initiative will combine IBM’s Deep Question Answering (QA), Natural Language Processing, and Machine Learning capabilities with Nuance's speech recognition and Clinical Language Understanding (CLU) solutions for the diagnosis and treatment of patients that provide hospitals, physicians and payers access to critical and timely information. The two companies expect the first commercial offerings from the collaboration to be available in 18 to 24 months. IBM and Nuance will jointly invest in a multi-year research initiative targeted to the applications of the Watson technology to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of patients in combination with Nuance’s voice and clinical language solutions. In addition, IBM has licensed access to the Watson technology to Nuance. IBM and Nuance are currently engaged in a five-year joint-research initiative designed to advance next-generation natural language speech technologies, the results of which will be commercialized by Nuance.
Much of this work has already been accomplished on many smartphone applications. Nuance and IBM will continue its longtime collaboration with speech-recognition software developer Nuance Communications to bring the analytics capabilities of supercomputer Watson into the health care field. Nuance will feed its CLU (Clinical Language Understanding) applications into IBM's Watson hardware.
Jonathan Yarmis, an independent industry analyst known as Doctor Disruptive for his focus on disruptive technologies, likens IBM’s Jeopardy success with Watson to President John F. Kennedy’s pledge of putting a man on the moon.
Moreover, Yarmis said, “The health care announcement with Nuance is just Step 1. Given Moore’s law, in five to seven years this [Watson-like capabilities] is something your standard desktop computer will do. And two years after that it’ll be on your tablet and on your cell phones the following year. This statement is highly ambitious and goes where no man has gone before…predictions such as this have been laid fallow in the past.
However, without dreams there is no progress. Who would have predicted a handheld phone would have more computing power than early desktop PCs?
My bet is that it will all fit in a watch or a ring on your little finger .
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Teamwork and the EMR potential
Numerous experts discuss the importance of teamwork to an enterprise for efficiency and safety. In healthcare this concept is a relatively new one in the clinical setting. EMR has many potentials and/or shortcomings in this regard and it will depend upon design and user interface optimization to reach it’s maximum potential.
Bob Wachter presents a scenario and back ground for discussing safety culture in medicine, such as the built in hold for surgeons to verbally perform checklists with other staff, such as sideness of surgery, type of surgery, and other important data with the support staff. These are all designed to minimize or eliminate ‘never events’ like wound infections, wrong side surgery, wrong organ removal, and administration of medications to which the patient is allergic.
These safety features can be designed into the record with visual graphics, such as an image of the body with a circle or X through the body part to be operated upon. Visual images are processed more readily than printed words, which are often lost in a jumble of letters, even if bold-faced our distinguished by a red color.
Team work can be enhanced by Vector Diagrams or simple block diagrams with participants and specialist each integrated into the overall flow sheet, rather than a list of consultants or tests. Transformation of events and participants should be automatically transferred to such diagrams without human input.
There are many readily appications which perform these actions in other industries and software applications available on the internet, to wit:
Visual thesaurus: (type in a word) This application builds a word map, much as your brain does for many tasks.) The display is intuitive giving instant meaning to relationships. This usage of the application could easily be adapted to professional resources and the team for each patient in a hospital setting. For very ill patients with multiple system issues this can be very complicated. The Virtual Consult Manager ferrets out key relationships easily seen by all participants in the team. Each segment can display as much or as little of the information in that segment. The circles can be clickable and take one straight to the relevant data for each team member.
The Map can be structured in a hierarchal, chronologic, spider, cluster or other organizational aids.
There are SDK for development of the map for other industries that interface with languages inherent in EMR, such as XML, CSS,
A few examples:
Now imagine these images as dynamic and fluid with changes in relationships. The user would be able to ‘pull out’ each button to see further breakdowns in organization, plans, and treatments.
You can trial this at Visual Thesaurus
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)