HEALTH TRAIN EXPRESS Mission: To promulgate health education across the internet: Follow or subscribe to Health Train Express as well as Digital Health Space for all the updates for health policy, reform, public health issues. Health Train Express is published several times a week.Subscribe and receive an email alert each time it is published. Health Train Express has been published since 2006.
Monday, June 15, 2026
A family member stood at the bedside asking why her son was on fentanyl, why he was on this particular antibiotic, whether she could see the cultures. She was treated as a nuisance. She was, in fact, the only unpaid second set of eyes in the room. That is not a story about one hospital. It is a story about who we let into the room when a patient cannot speak for themselves, and what we lose when we shut them out. Laura Buchman, MBA is a patient advocate and the author of NERVE: Surviving Medical Madness. Her son, healthy at 19, went to the hospital for chest pain and within days was paralyzed from the neck down and on a ventilator. She was kept out of rounds. When she questioned a strong antibiotic, she was told the physician had done the job for 25 years, and that ended the conversation. She went back through the medical records herself and reconstructed what she believes was a cascade of avoidable harm. For anyone who leads a clinical team, runs a safety program, or designs how families are handled at the bedside, her experience surfaces three things worth sitting with. First, an engaged family member is a free safety layer, not a threat to throughput. The questions she asked, why this drug, why now, can I see the culture results, are the same questions a good safety culture wants asked out loud. Second, "I have done this for 25 years" is a tell, not an answer. When seniority is used to close a question rather than satisfy it, the system has just lost information it needed. Third, the rate is the argument. One large study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found roughly one in four reviewed patients experienced an adverse event. At that rate, the family asking why is not paranoid. They are statistically reasonable. She is careful to credit the individual clinicians as kind and well meaning. Her critique is structural, which is exactly what makes it a leadership problem rather than a personnel one. The mechanism is simple and uncomfortable. Most of what she uncovered was already in the chart. The failure was not missing data. It was a default posture that treats the family as a visitor to be managed rather than a monitor to be debriefed. That posture is a design choice, and design choices are something leaders can change. Search "The Podcast by KevinMD" wherever you listen to podcasts What is one change a leader could make this quarter so that a family member's question at the bedside is captured as a safety signal rather than managed as an interruption? #PatientSafety #HealthcareLeadership #PatientExperience #ThePodcastbyKevinMD…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment