Health Train Express: Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law

The definitive report has been published. The advice is overwhelming. There is no longer an emergency, and the EULA is no longer valid. There is no pandemic. The virus has mutated. The current vaccine is minimally effective and decreases mortality only in patients with chronic illness, such as heart disease, hypertension and end stage kidney disease. It should not be given to children or adolescents. COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify as Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits

There are more than 3400 peer-reviewed manuscripts in the medical literature concerning fatal and nonfatal COVID-19 vaccine injuries, including those recognized by regulatory agencies around the world, such as myocarditis, neurologic injury, thrombosis, and immunologic syndromes. Emerging evidence from diverse global datasets indicates patterns of concerning adverse events and mortality trends associated with COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, raising critical questions about risk-benefit balance and long-term safety. Due to these significant concerns, we reviewed the literature for excess mortality, DNA contamination, and negative efficacy associated with COVID-19 vaccines, along with compiling a comprehensive list of all calls for an immediate moratorium.

Reported Deaths for Major Drug/Vaccine Recalls Versus Total COVID-19 Vaccine Deaths Reported to VAERS. *Figure reprinted from Rhodes and Parry [25], who obtained permission from VAERS Analysis to use their figure [26]. Permission to use this figure has been granted by the open access Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

As of April 26, 2024, according to VAERS, the total number of reported COVID-19 vaccine deaths (37,544 among all countries that use VAERS) has far exceeded the recall limits of past vaccine withdrawals by up to 375,340% (Figure 2) [25, 26]. In 1955, the Cutter polio vaccine was immediately recalled after 10 death reports [27]. The swine flu vaccine of 1976 was recalled after 53 reported fatalities [25]. In 1999, the Rotashield vaccine was suspended after 15 cases of intussusception [28]. The substantial contrast between COVID-19 vaccine death reports and historical vaccine recalls indicates significant shortcomings in data safety monitoring.

Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines

More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, researchers, and concerned citizens, 240 elected government officials, 17 professional public health and physician organizations (Figure 3), 2 State Republican Parties, 17 Republican Party County Committees, and 6 scientific studies from across the world have called for the market withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines (Table 3). Doctors for COVID Ethics called for the global recall of COVID-19 vaccines on March 10, 2021 [48]. In May 2021, Bruno et al. (50 authors) called for a pause in the mass vaccination program if vaccination programs worldwide do not institute independent data safety monitoring boards (DSMB), event adjudication committees (EAC), and enact risk mitigation [49]. The World Council for Health, on November 29, 2021, issued a declaration “demanding that governments and corporations cease and desist from direct or indirect participation in the manufacturing, distribution, administration or promotion of COVID-19 experimental injections” based on serious safety concerns [50]. In May 2022, the Global COVID Summit, including more than 17,000 physicians and scientists, declared that “the COVID-19 experimental genetic therapy injections must end” [51]. In October 2022, the Association of Health Professionals and Independent Researchers (APSIIN) sent a letter to the Ministry of Health in Chile to request the immediate suspension of inoculation with mRNA platforms [52]. Dr. McCullough concluded with the assent of expert panels that complete market removal of all COVID-19 vaccines was justified based on the excess risk of death, on December 7, 2022, in the US Senate [53], and on September 13, 2023, in the European Parliament [54]. On March 21, 2023, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons issued a factual, scientifically grounded, and consensus-driven statement calling for all COVID-19 vaccines to be removed from the market based on lack of safety and efficacy [55]. The National Citizens Inquiry, a Canadian citizen-led and citizen-funded organization chartered to investigate governments’ COVID-19 policies, on September 14, 2023, called for market removal of all COVID-19 vaccines [56]. In late 2023, Americans for Health Freedom created a signable pledge calling for COVID-19 shots to be pulled off the market [57]. As of December 1, 2024, 228 elected officials, 17 County Political Committees, 2 State Political Parties, and multiple physician organizations have signed the pledge calling for COVID-19 vaccines to be removed from the market, including but not limited to Sen. Ron Johnson, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Rep. Thomas Massie, Arizona and Idaho Republican Parties, America’s Frontline Doctors, Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, Health Advisory and Recovery Team, the Global Health Project, and the Global COVID Summit [57].On January 4, 2024, the Florida Surgeon General called for the removal of all mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from human use because of contamination by cDNA fragments and the risk of genotoxicity [58]. On January 12, 2024, Dr. McCullough again called for the removal of all COVID-19 booster products from the market in a US House of Representatives Panel on COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries [59]. On February 29, 2024, members from New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS) presented a comprehensive letter to parliament calling for the immediate withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines due to significant safety concerns [60]. In 2024, the McCullough Foundation issued several statements on social media platforms calling for an immediate moratorium on COVID-19 vaccines due to excess death and DNA contamination concerns [61]. In July 2024, Mead et al. published a pair of extensively referenced, peer-reviewed manuscripts concluding the COVID-19 vaccines are not safe for human use and should be removed from the market [3, 62]. The HOPE Accord, an international group of healthcare professionals, scientists, academics and concerned citizens, called for the immediate suspension of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and a comprehensive reevaluation of their safety and efficacy on July 3, 2024 [63]. The accord has garnered 64,168 signatures from prominent medical experts, researchers, and concerned citizens who argue that emerging evidence suggests these novel vaccine products may be contributing to increased rates of disability and excess deaths. Legal action was filed on October 11, 2024, by VERITY France, along with scientists, citizens, and victims, before the Administrative Tribunal of Montreuil, seeking the prohibition of the prescription and distribution of the COMIRNATY vaccine by PFIZER-BioNTech and the SPIKEVAX vaccine by MODERNA, as well as their withdrawal from the market by the National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) [64]. On November 1, 2024, Rogers et al. published a study that found a significant breach in the safety signal threshold concerning cerebral thrombosis adverse events after COVID-19 vaccines and called for a global moratorium [65]. Also in November 2024, a study by Oldfield et al. recommended a moratorium on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines due to incomplete data, serious safety concerns, and potential long-term risks [66]. On November 25, 2024, the NORTH Group, an international group of politicians and leading medical and other professionals sent a letter of “extreme concern” to the heads of state of 11 European countries (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and Ireland) calling for a suspension of modified mRNA vaccines citing serious health concerns [67]. On December 3, 2024, Kämmerer et al. published an original article that called for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals due to DNA contamination [43]. On December 4, 2024, we were able to obtain email confirmation that 4 members of European Parliament want the COVID-19 vaccines removed from the market: Christine Anderson (Germany), Cristian Terhes (Romania), Virginie Joron (France), and Gerald Hauser (Austria). Moreover, we received confirmation that 8 current and former Australian Federal Senators and Federal Members of Parliament have called for the removal of COVID-19 vaccines, including Gerard Rennick, Alex Antic, Malcolm Roberts, Ralph Babet, Matt Canavan, Pauline Hanson, Russell Broadbent, and Craig Kelly. We also obtained confirmation that Children’s Health Defense [68] calls for the COVID-19 vaccines to be immediately removed from the market.

Conclusion

We expect that calls for an immediate moratorium on COVID-19 vaccines will continue to increase until a critical mass is reached, and the products are finally removed from the market. Excess mortality, negative efficacy, and widespread DNA contamination associated with COVID-19 vaccines have been sufficiently demonstrated. The FDA’s criteria for a Class I recall have been far exceeded. No large-scale, conclusive, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated a reduction in infection transmission, hospitalization, or death as primary endpoints. Thus, the COVID-19 vaccines are not proven to be effective in reducing important clinical outcomes. A position supporting COVID-19 vaccination goes against good medical practice and violates the Hippocratic Oath to do no harm. Immediate removal of COVID-19 vaccines from the market is essential to prevent further loss of life and ensure the next steps for accountability are taken.