HEALTH TRAIN EXPRESS
Mission: To promulgate health education across the internet:
Follow or subscribe to Health Train Express as well as Digital Health Space for all the updates for health policy, reform, public health issues. Health Train Express is published several times a week.Subscribe and receive an email alert each time it is published. Health Train Express has been published since 2006.
Intravitreal injection into the eye via the pars plana. This is a common method for treating diabetic hemorrhage. Stem cell injection is not approved for routine use.
Public Health Alert. Be wary of all outpatient stem cell treatments. Genuine clinical trials for any unique treatments are listed in clinicaltrials.gov. These are studies carefully controlled by credible research MDs and their teams. This is a sad story. Stem cell therapy for retinal diseases in . still in it's early stages (such as for Retinitis pigmentosa. The media vastly exaggerates the usefulness of stem cell treatments.
Diagrammatic representation of how stem cells are extracted and reprogrammed.
Route of Administration of Stem Cells into the Eye
Stem cells have enormous potential for treatments. Analagous to the development of nuclear energy it has the potential for great harm if used ignorantly or unwisely. Deciphering how stem cells differentiate is analogous to the development of the atomic bomb. How stem cells differentiate is largely unknown, and research is ongoing. We are only beginning to understand the genetics and molecular biology of pluripotent stem cell differentiation. References: Pubmed:
Now You See? Former CBS Reporter and Media Professional exposes the mind manipulation used by special interest groups, media, and medical. Share. What is the reality ? Specialty interests disguise their true role. Astro-turf-fake grass is in the media. Astro-turfers seeks to manipulate you. They attack the truth, disseminate chaos, conflicting studies, multiple experts and yes, WIKIPEDIA. Wikipedia is not peer reviewed, nor edited. It conflicted with peer reviewed articles 90% of the time. Drug companies manipulate Google search engines, finance positive studies for drugs, CME lectures are often funded by pharma companies. Pharma often 'stimulates' epidemics and new disorders to promote their new drugs. How do you separate fact from fiction? 1. Use of inflammatory language 2 Claim to debunk myths 3. Beware attacks 4. Astroturfers question those who question authority. All of this ponts to a lack of integrity Another Medical Moment from Health Train Express
Technology disruption in one field can precipitate a cascade of events resulting in a sea-change in another. In health care this is happening for transportation to hospitals.
Uber has found a new spot for transporting non-acute patients to emergency rooms. Some patients may also find it useful for events such as asthma and/or other non life threatening events.
Uber however may find itself in a legal dilemna transporting patients with medical conditions requiring assistance if interventions may be necessary.
At this point I would not expect Uber to be self-policing. They should require drivers to be BCLS certified and qualified in first aid. There are many scenarios that would call into question this practice.
Pamela Wible runs "The Ideal Medical Clinic". She also is an advocate for prevention of Physician Suicide.
In this podcast, I share insights from a doc who barely survived his suicide attempt plus simple ways to prevent the next suicide. Listen in. You may save a life.
Dear Pamela, I’ve never been so happy to fail at something in my life. Four weeks ago today I died. Cardiopulmonary arrest in jail. Why was I in jail? My wife alerted the police. Sheriff deputies were upset when I did not pull over to talk to them after overdosing. After boxing me in, they threw me from my truck into the slushy street and tased me. After charging me with a felony and two misdemeanors, they nearly provided the perfect assist to my suicide. Through a series of miracles I was brought back. I am missing four days of my life including three on life support, but I am alive. I have to repair almost every relationship I treasure from the betrayal of my weakness, a chore I will perform with as much love and patience as I can muster. I may never practice my specialty again, but I am alive. My family has a husband, father, son, and brother.............
I had just lost a young girl in the ER a few weeks before. Influenza. I followed proper protocol, gave her a couple of treatments and she felt better so I discharged her home with appropriate warnings. Thirty hours later she came back, in respiratory arrest. She ended up on life support with family refusing to withdraw care. They, of course, blamed me. And, of course, complained.
My review was days later. While my employers were very sorry about the case and stated support for me, the result would likely lead to termination due to this incident and a few other cases that were trivial. I thanked them for their honesty. At first my wife and I talked about it, and I was fine. I could likely go back full time where I used to work. I returned to work that night sad, but comfortable with my likely outcome. When I got home in the early morning hours I was just sad. I cried for the girl and her family. I cried myself to sleep and woke up still sad.
There’s a saying we have in the emergency room when we witness trauma and death among the innocent: “A little piece of my soul died.” We’re never offered counseling and in the end you get the jaded emergency doctor who struggles to care. My psychologist says it wasn’t just the last girl. It was trauma after trauma after trauma.
Pretty sure I have PTSD from the Haiti rescue and recovery trip. From bloated bodies liquifying in the heat to starving kids begging in the street. Years later, walking into a Mexican hotel with similar tiles and stucco walls, I was overwhelmed by the smell of rotting flesh. Other times when opening a large perirectal abscess, I could smell dead bodies.
Sitting alone with my grief, I grabbed what I needed and drove up to the mountains. I thought my wife would be better off without me. I texted: “I’m so sorry. You deserve better. I have tried to be strong. I can’t take it any more. To have that girl die was too much. To have to face being terminated for it? I can’t go on. I’m sorry. I love you to the end of the world and back but after one final hurt, I can finally stop hurting you. You have your family and church to help you and you have your finances taken care of.”
I took a handful of pills with the final thoughts that my student loan debt would not pass on to my wife and at least she has my life insurance to take care of her. Then came the police cars. I don’t know why, except not wanting to talk to them or face my wife, I continued driving. I obeyed all traffic laws, never exceeded 22 mph and in no way endangered pedestrians or other motorists. At one point I pulled to the side, and multiple officers took cover and aimed guns at me. They wanted to know if I had guns, and I told them that they were in the vehicle and they could have them. I kept my hands visible as directed but refused to exit the truck because I did not want to talk to them. Ultimately, I was thrown from the truck, tasered, cuffed, and put in the back of a police car.
commentary: Police are no longer there to protect and serve...This makes me very angry!
I requested to go to the hospital. I was surprised that they took me to jail. Seemed weird because I thought all suicidal people came to the hospital first. I started to get sick from the overdose. Sweating and nauseated and a little unstable on my feet. They had me sit in a holding cell in the booking area, and that’s the last I remember.
Police need to be trained in communicating with emotionally disturbed people. Police department and authorities are totally negligent and culpable for many events.
Of the next four days I have almost no memory. I am told I went into respiratory then cardiac arrest in the jail and they started CPR. I was finally transported to the hospital, where they got a pulse back. I was critically ill on ventilator support. My family was told I was going to die. Then my sweet daughter found what I took, and the appropriate meds were given. I improved. Couple days later I was off the vent and out of the ICU.
Almost every day, since that worst day, my wife just looks at me and repeats “I can’t believe it even happened!” The people I’ve told about this are utterly shocked. I have spoken with a few residents I used to teach and they can’t believe it. I can’t either.Seemingly without warning. Could happen to any doctor.
Sticks work better than carrots in economic terms but are politically damaging.
Republican efforts to replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are not over, despite the failure of the American Health Care Act (AHCA) legislation. The major challenge facing the AHCA was the loss of insurance coverage for an estimated 24 million people.1 Any subsequent reform, especially those less costly than the ACA, will have the same challenge of keeping currently insured individuals and households from discontinuing their insurance. In this Viewpoint, we draw on behavioral economics to propose 4 general principles for health insurance reform to help ensure that the currently insured will not lose their coverage.
Incentives for Healthy Individuals
In insurance markets, healthy people subsidize people with acute and chronic disease and other health conditions. Insurance is still valuable for healthy people, because they need not be concerned about the risk of no insurance coverage in the event of unexpected injuries or acute health events. However, there is often a tendency to minimize those future risks and use the money now for more pressing concerns rather than signing up for expensive insurance. Once enough healthy people no longer elect to enroll in and purchase health insurance, a major challenge occurs, with rising premiums and the eventual collapse of insurance markets.
Incentives to encourage healthy individuals to sign up for health insurance can be described as either carrots or sticks. The ACA has both carrots (refundable tax credits) and a stick—the mandate—to ensure that healthy persons purchase insurance. Granted, the stick was not always effective; initially the amount was too small, and the penalty is too far in the future. But it was widely credited with increasing enrollment by overcoming “present bias,” the idea that potential future medical costs are discounted too much when compared with having to write a check for insurance premiums today. By contrast, current proposals rely almost entirely on carrots—tax credits for enrollees.
Behavioral Economics Principles
The first principle from behavioral economics research is that carrots do not work nearly as well as sticks; $2 in subsidies induces approximately the same behavioral response as $1 in penalties.2 Furthermore, subsidies drain money from the federal treasury, whereas sticks bring in more revenue.
A second behavioral economics principle involves instant gratification; paying significant premiums means that something is received in return. Bare-bones or catastrophic plans, along with health savings accounts, do not do well from the perspective of instant gratification. Aside from the relatively few families who benefit from receiving catastrophic care, the vast majority of people do not experience any “immediate gratification” from paying those premiums, because they never reach the catastrophic cap. Even current enrollees in bronze high-deductible plans wonder why, after paying substantial premiums, they still are responsible for burdensome deductibles and co-pays.
People’s tendency to focus on immediate gratification also has important implications for the continuous coverage requirement in the AHCA. This requirement is a stick but is unlikely to work. Under this provision, if an individual who did not purchase insurance coverage now or who lets current insurance coverage lapse, would have been subject to a 30% penalty to sign up again. It is unlikely that young invincibles, young healthy people who see themselves as invulnerable who have been ignoring health insurance up until now, will suddenly become concerned about their ability to buy insurance many years down the road. Furthermore, the 30% stick would have discouraged uninsured people from buying insurance—precisely the opposite effect of the mandate.
Failure inevitably brings analysis and theory...neither of which can guarrantee success on the next go-a-round.
AAMC increases projection of physician shortage up to 100K
The Association of American Medical Colleges' (AAMC) new estimates of the country's growing physician shortage shows it will range from 34,600 to 88,000 doctors by 2025 and from 40,800 to 104,900 by 2030.
The AAMC's estimates in 2016 showed a projected shortage ranging between 61,700 and 94,700 by 2025.
The number of new physicians is "not keeping pace with the healthcare demands of a growing and aging population," according to the study conducted by a division of the global information company IHS Markit.
The growing awareness of the physician shortage has helped many in the healthcare industry develop new strategies to better help the dwindling amount of medical professionals meet the increased demand for care services, which is partly due to a larger portion of the population having health insurance coverage.
These range from allowing nurse practitioners to practice independently to easing at least some of doctors' administrative burdens. The number of administrative tasks that physicians are required to do on a daily basis, including imputing health data into electronic health record systems, has been continuously cited as the main cause of burnout by physicians who have responded to surveys like the one conducted by Medscape.
A medical student and a radiation oncology specialist wrote a shared byline published by Stat on Tuesday that argues addressing the concerns medical professionals have with debt and their financial stress will help prevent burnout and depression. They offered "six strategic solutions" to focus on, such as limiting tuition increases and increasing federal funding.
However, the shortage is not just among physicians but also among nurses. A report released earlier this month shows nearly half of surveyed nurses (49.8%) are considering leaving the profession, which will in turn exacerbate the problem at a time when the country's aging population will continue to increase the demand for care.
“By 2030, the U.S. population of Americans aged 65 and older will grow by 55%, which makes the projected shortage especially troubling,” AAMC President and CEO Darrell G. Kirchsaid in a statement. “As patients get older, they need two to three times as many services, mostly in specialty care, which is where the shortages are particularly severe.”
The AAMC once again recommended a multi pronged solution to the problem. This includes "expanding medical school class size, innovating in care delivery and team-based care, making better use of technology, and increasing federal support for an additional 3,000 new residency positions per year over the next five years."
AMR teams up with Lyft for nonemergency patient rides
American Medical Response has partnered with rideshare firm Lyft to provide nonemergency transportation for patients in 42 states where the ambulance company operates.
Hospitals and caregivers can arrange for Lyft rides via AMR’s One Call phone or online portal services.
While millions have gained health coverage under the Affordable Care Act, many still face barriers to care because of transportation. Community hospitals average 62 no-shows a day, at an annual cost of $3 million, according to a study by BMC Health Services Research. For teaching hospitals, no-show and late arrival rates average 25% and 31%, respectively.
Patients with multiple chronic conditions, the poor and the elderly are especially likely to need assistance with transportation. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, lack of access to transportation, along with finances and scarcity of specialists, particularly in rural areas, partially accounts for delayed care and unmet medical needs.
The efforts by ridesharing companies are good news not only for hospitals, but for the federal government as well, which spends an estimated $2.7 billion a year on nonemergency medical transportation. That figure is expected to grow under Medicaid expansion. To boost ACA enrollment for 2017, HHS partnered with Lyft to provide discounted rides during Open Enrollment events last fall.
Lyft also provides nonemergency rides to New York City Medicaid patients via the National Medtrans Network and through a partnership with Carelinx.
Recent advances and integration of mobile applications such as Lyft and Uber will increase availability and accessibility for patients needing transportation. It remains to be seen if payors and medicare will accept this mode for reimbursement without further qualifications.
Will Lyft drivers be qualified in CPR, or to assist chronically impaired riders?
As predictions go, pandemics are one of the scariest. Inevitable and with a huge unknown quantity, pandemics are something that even the World Health Organisation are urging people not to ignore, with the frightening forecast that there will be, “sometime in the future, an event that will kill…somewhere between 80 and 90 million people.”
There are lots of hypothetical situations and theories about where a virus will come from, what it will do and the devastation it will have. In fact, there are already scientists working on vaccines that the human population may need in the event of a global outbreak. There’s actually a World Health Organisation Global Vaccine Plan!
In this infographic, we take a look at some of the possible pandemics of the future and how you can best prepare yourself against the spread of germs.
Catholic Health Initiatives is including its $483 million operating loss in its merger plans with Dignity Health.
CHI says the losses were due to “lower patient volumes, higher labor costs, increased pharmacy prices, and reduced reimbursement in Medicare and Medicaid,” according to a Modern Healthcare report.
Electronic health records increase operating costs and decreased margins significantly.
Catholic Health Initiatives is not alone with the backlash on expenses, investment, and reduced in patient volume
Revenues for the nonprofit health system with 103 hospitals in 17 states increased 7.4% from $14.8 billion in 2015 to $15.9 billion in 2016. However, expenses rose 10.2% over the same time to $16.1 billion from $14.6 billion in the previous year. Losses occurred even though the struggling health system has laid off workers, sold off $600 million in real estate, and stepped back from its failed health plan.
Provider reimbursement is only a small part of what Medi-Cal pays. It pays for indigent care, skilled nursing facilities, home health services. Providers receive only a small portion of the total budget for medi-cal patients.
The Affordable Care Act has made insurance available to many who live at or near the poverty line. However it does not assure access to providers who are the entry level into the system.
Contrary to prediction patient flows the emergency rooms have become even bigger since few providers accept medi-cal. Medi-Cal's rates do not cover overhead for providers, and they are often seen at a loss unfortunately.
Insurance and access are two sides of the coin in regard to health care.
Click on the link to learn more about Medi-Cal and the Our Health California Community. Join and get involved.
This is the way to bringing a sensible and workable plan with bipartisan support. No matter what the plan patients and providers need to get behind the plan . There is not perfect plan, and the perfect plan is the enemy of the good.
Trumpcare failure is an opportunity to end the divisiveness that hampered the Obamacare era.
The failure of Trumpcare last week can be seen as a rejection of policies that Americans judged would move the country backwards. But it also presents the opportunity to end the divisiveness that hampered the Obamacare era and move forward in a bipartisan direction that focuses not on destructive rhetoric, but squarely on reducing premiums and expanding access for all Americans.
The policies and the politics of Trumpcare were extreme and favored by only 17% of voters as compared with the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which enjoys support from 50%. The central plank of the bill cut care for the neediest children, elderly and disabled to pay for a large tax cut for the wealthy. The process, likewise, began with the most partisan approach possible. Republicans skirted Democratic input, avoided public hearings, and ended up rushing a bill without enough time for impartial evaluation.
The president has a chance now to turn this around. Last week, he invited Ezekiel Emanuel, a Democratic policy expert who helped craft the ACA, to the White House. Emanuel and I had dinner after his visit to the Oval Office, and he reviewed the commonsense ideas he shared with the president that were neither Democratic- nor Republican-leaning. The president had already chosen to head down a partisan path, but by inviting Emanuel, he might have signaled a potential interest in a bipartisan approach should that one fail.
Trump has an immediate opportunity to help Americans reduce their costs by choosing to enforce and properly steward what House Speaker Paul Ryan rightly called the "law of the land." The administration has the power to impact the cost of insurance by 25% to 30% with two simple decisions, according to a conversation I had with Mario Molina, CEO of Molina Health, one of the largest insurers in the exchange.
First, the administration, with support from Congress, should commit to permanently funding payments that reduce the size of deductibles for lower-income Americans (called cost-sharing reductions). Republicans need to drop a lawsuit they filed to stop these payments, or Trump needs to say they are going to continue. Second, the administration should enforce the individual insurance mandate until a different approach can be agreed upon. Those two actions will reduce costs for millions and need to be done now before insurers submit initial premiums for next year, or inaction will drive up premiums. Americans should watch this intently.
A third step would be to grant states the flexibility to increase competition and reduce costs. Non-partisan analysts such as Standard & Poor's confirm that the online exchanges that sell ACA insurance policies are stable, but in some states the cost of insurance is out of reach for those who earn too much to receive tax credits.
The administration has tools to do this, including a section of the ACA designed to allow states to pursue different approaches, including those more suited to their political philosophy, so long as they continue to meet the basic aims of covering more people with high-quality coverage. Alaska was the first to use this process last year by creating a statewide reinsurance pool. Such pools protect insurers against losses in high-cost cases, and the savings are passed along to consumers. In Alaska, the result was a dramatic reduction in premiums.
A signifcant number of children are injured or are murdered by adult predators. It is a population management challenge. Firstly to prevent these occurrences by identifying perpetrators, to identify where they live, and prevent them from contacting children. Secondly to educate parents and children how to maximize their safety.
Attention is brought to us by large headlines, Amber alerts, missing person reports, and now on social media. There are a wide variety of topics. Sexual predators, Cyberbullying,Molestation, Pedophilia, Abduction, Social Media awareness, and online safety. Kidslivesafe.com offers an online eBook which thoroughly covers all these topics.
Fortunately our system now registers all convicted sexual offenders. There is a registered database that anyone can use. For parents who want to learn where sexual predators live in their neighborhood Kidslivesafe offer a search by zip code service.
It is a public health problem, one that children are particularly vulnerable. Educate yourself and your children.
