For the past three years I have been beating the drum about the development of HIE and RHIOs. I have not come to any final conclusions about the destiny of this "visionary" prospect. There are a great deal of positives and negatives regarding HIE and EMRs.
I will deal with some of the negatives first.
1. Most providers complain about the complexity and bureaucracy of practicing medicine, in regard to regulatory requirements, the hurdles of reimbursement, and exponential increases in business overhead.
2. The burden of Health IT may outweigh the benefits.
3. HIT is very expensive
4. Automation and the impersonal nature of IT does not really fit in to the paradigm of medical care. Despite patient enthusiasm for all things technical most providers are reluctant to introduce an infrastructure that will make them dependent on third parties.
5. Most physician providers operate on the basis of accountability, reliability, and a one on one relationship with each patient. IT is not going to improve the patient relationship.
6. Medical care has always been a unique portion of our economy, and recently outside forces have forced change, some good, and some very detrimental to patient care.
Positive:
1. The introduction of web 2.0 has greatly expanded patient education, and allows patients to ask more relevant questions.
2. Web 2,0 also introduces transparency and allow for "error checking" on the part of patients
3. Web 2.0 also increases the providers outreach for reliable information instantly at the point of care.
4. Most providers who have installed EMR speak positively about having it, and "would not go back to the old system" (my comments are that they could not even if they wanted to, because of their heavy investment in the system.
That's my meager summary after three years, it is not all inclusive.
Beginning next week Health Train Express will change direction. Look for a change in content first, then a change in the front end. I hope to maintain the title "Health Train Express" however our domain name may change.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Obamacare and the Subsidy
The third-party payment system has stripped power from patients, distorted incentives and disrupted markets. It doesn’t trust patients to ch...
-
(click for locations) Or is it Doctor Google ? Either you are a lover or a hater of all things Google. Google however has some thing...
-
David’s Health Tech Newsletter: No. 62 – “Companies Disrupting Healthcare In 2015” via reddit.com The 21st Century has shown rapid develo...
-
At the intersection of health, health care, and policy.At the intersection of health, health care, and policy. A Four Years Into A C...
2 comments:
I'm not conversant with the nomenclature you use, but I have some experience with EMR. In my case, it's not the sort that provides algorithms; rather it's the immediate transcription of notes into digital and available form, and the instant insertion of lab and Xray data (including the images) so that the patient records are more or less instantaneously up to date and readily available throughout our large clinic, and even at password-protected modules at the hospital. That, I must say, is an absolute boon -- eliminating the futile record search when a patient shows up for a consult, having to scramble around to find lab and Xray. And the availability of the full record at three a.m. in the ER is invaluable. So I'm a believer. I haven't had to try to pry my H and Ps, etc, into a pre-determined format, and I imagine I'd find it very frustrating.
Sid; Some of my eponyms refer to RHIOs (Regional Health Information Organizations. Check my earlier blog for "glossary of terms".It is back a couple of months. I really enjoy your posts. brings back memories of when I was a GP ( a real one!)
Gary L
Post a Comment