So, Why are these people Smiling?
1. They just voted to give themselves a raise.
2. They learned how to pass legislation without reading the bill
3. All doctors will be replaced by computers.
4. 1&3
5. None of the above.
6. All of the Above.
HEALTH TRAIN EXPRESS Mission: To promulgate health education across the internet: Follow or subscribe to Health Train Express as well as Digital Health Space for all the updates for health policy, reform, public health issues. Health Train Express is published several times a week.Subscribe and receive an email alert each time it is published. Health Train Express has been published since 2006.
Friday, March 25, 2011
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
PERSPECTIVE The ACO Model — A Three-Year Financial Loss?
The NEJM” reports on ACO in their “Health Policy and Reform” Report.
The accountable care organization (ACO) model is rather controversial among health care experts. Its proponents tout the potential savings and coordinated care that could be achieved through this model.1 Others, however, point out that the model is not without risks, such as the potential for anticompetitive effects as providers leverage it to concentrate market power.2,3
Because of the need to stem the spiraling costs of the Medicare program and the need to shift the health care system from volume-based to value-based rewards, the ACO has been put forward as a possible model for restructuring traditional Medicare coverage.4 In particular, Section 3022 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish the Medicare Shared Savings Program by January 1, 2012. With this rapid movement toward ACOs, one would expect that the previous government demonstration of the model would have produced promising results that warranted its rapid expansion. Our analysis of the results from the demonstration suggests otherwise.
CMS conducted the PGP Demonstration from 2005 to 2010, using a hybrid payment model that consisted of routine Medicare fee-for-service payments plus the opportunity to earn bonus payments known as shared savings. Eligibility was narrowly restricted to a select group of large physician group practices with the necessary experience, infrastructure, and financial strength (participants invested $1.7 million, on average, in the first year alone) to succeed in the demonstration. Thus, the structure of the demonstration should have resulted in a high likelihood of positive results. Yet most PGP participants did not break even on their initial investment.
The available data indicate that 8 of the 10 PGPs in the demonstration did not receive any shared savings payments in year 1. In the second year, 6 of the 10 practices did not receive such payments, and in the third year, half the participants were still not eligible for any shared savings to offset their initial investment. Given that the percentage of shared savings in the first 3 years was so low for experienced, integrated physician practices, it seems highly unlikely that newly established, independent practices would be able to average the necessary 20% return on their investment.
In addition, the participants did not receive provider- feedback reports and bonus payments in a timely manner, which may have negatively affected their ability to perform more effectively and receive greater shared savings. These limitations, however, do not significantly alter our overall findings. In fact, we were very conservative in our analysis, since we did not incorporate the operating costs for the second and third years of the demonstration. If we had included such costs, the projections would have been even worse.
The high up-front investments make the model a poor fit for most physician group practices; the time frame in which one can expect a reasonable return on the initial investment is more than 5 years; and even the majority of large, experienced, integrated physician group practices could not recover their initial investment within the first 3 years. Absent changes to the design of the ACO model, the analysis suggests that before agreeing to become part of an ACO, physician group practices must conduct due diligence and explore participation in viable alternatives such as other initiatives involving bundled payments for episodes of care.
Caution:
For policymakers, the urge to do something must be tempered by the risk of disrupting the entire value-based–purchasing movement. We are concerned that physicians and providers may unwittingly undermine future value-based–purchasing efforts if the ACO model fails to live up to the high expectations that do not comport with the data. Our analysis suggests that there are options for addressing the design weaknesses of the ACO model. One is for CMS to limit participation in the Medicare Shared Savings Program to a narrow group of provider organizations that can absorb the likely financial losses in the early years of participation. CMS could limit eligibility in a manner consistent with the original design framework for the PGP Demonstration. This option would be consistent with the GAO report, which questioned how far the ACO model could be extended beyond the 1% of physician practices that resemble the organizations that participated in the original demonstration.
Alternative Solutions:
A second, more inclusive option would be to change the payment design
from an annual model to a cumulative model. In the cumulative model, CMS could assess performance over the aggregate number of years during which an organization had participated in the ACO program and reduce the shared-savings threshold accordingly, making it more likely that physicians could demonstrate significant improvements. For policymakers and payers, such a cumulative model would distinguish organizations that wish to leverage the ACO model for short-term, anticompetitive gains from those that wish to be rewarded for an investment in better-coordinated delivery of health care.
The conceptual underpinnings of the ACO model are laudable. By addressing the payment defect in the current model, policymakers would reward organizations for making the long-term financial commitment necessary to establish and maintain a value-based delivery system.
Sec’y Sibelius, “Can You Hear Me Now?”
Friday, March 18, 2011
What Can Anyone Say or Do?
Neither physicians, nor patients (not consumers) really have much control
over health care, despite what all the MBAs, Pundits, Consumer Advocacy Committees and Wanabees running all over the country going to seminars, meetings, Health 2.0 and the like. Physicians are always pictured as rich, fat and living off their unfortunate patients who are misled by the government and payors in the name of money. These organizations attribute their own feelings and attitudes upon doctors about the expense of caring for sick patients. They project their own attitudes on physicians.
During my early career years (about 20 or more years ago) I made a very nice living, if I say so myself I saw many patients for free. I would do surgeries for free, arranged for charitable care, had colleagues I could refer to who would be gratified that I would send them poor patients because they saw my trust in them to do the ‘right’ thing. I never sent a patient to collections, (doctors would just not do that sort of thing) Not that I was so wonderful, but the vast majority of doctors would do the same as I did.
Physicians would graciously go to an Emergency department, when called, grateful for the referral. In fact physicians who would not respond to an ER call were shunned, and even reprimanded by the chief of staff or even would have their hospital privileges revoked. Today many physicians, if at all possible will resign from a hospital to avoid ER call.
Did you know that most insurance companies require you to have hospital privileges or have someone who will sign off that they will cover you to be on their panels?
When I observe what is happening in our world I realize that as Americans our greatest entitlement is freedom. That doesn’t mean freedom to ‘redistribute the wealth’, nor free healthcare, nor huge pensions.
The beauty of freedom is freedom allows for corrective changes without concern for rigidity of bureaucracy.The beauty of freedom is the ability for creation of new transformative ideas, and the implementation.Liberty and freedom are risky, and ultimately requires more input and energy than socialism or collective action. Why should your health depend upon a politician who knows little about healthcare, distracted by other decisions such as war,immigration issues, foreign policy and the liittany of challenges facing our nation. What would a former Governor know about running HHS?. Did anyone ask the doctors or for that matter congress and the people if Don Berwick MD was a suitable head for CMS?
As most physicians think in the doctor’s lounge (if your hospital still has one), our system is badly broken, unrepairable except by a sweeping dictatorial reform such as Obamacare, It.doesn’t matter if it will work or not,
All of this is not unique to medicine, it has become endemic in all of America.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
A.C.O. More on
Ken Cohn, wrote to me today about ACOs. Ken Cohn describes multiple issues and complete ambiguity regarding how to form or implement an ACO.
Here is what he wrote to me.
“Dear Gary,
I participated in a panel discussion of physicians' roles in Accountable Care Organizations two weeks ago. The blog post that summarized the discussion resulted in a firestorm of comments. When you would like to learn more about ways that you can engage physicians to improve healthcare collaboration, please read on.
Doug Hastings, a lawyer and Chairman of Epstein, Becker, Green, empathized with the difficulties that healthcare leaders face, planning for an uncertain future in the absence of specific regulations regarding Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs). When he summarized the 2011 National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) draft guidelines, he mentioned the following overriding concepts related to ACO formation and operation:
Jeff Petry, VP of Business Development at Premier, said that the 3 R's of ACOs include:
- Regulations
- Reimbursement
- Relationships
Possible roles for physician champions in ACOs include:
- Presenting and discussing clinical data with fellow physicians
- Minimizing physician-hospital battles
- Creating a safe environment for learning
- Helping to build transparency and trust
The above strategies and tactics have worked in hospitals in 40 states where I have worked. What is working for you where you work?”
He did not mention specific hospitals
Mr. Cohn then goes on to discuss building relationships and possible roles for physician champions, suggesting some of the following:
Possible roles for physician champions in ACOs include:
- Presenting and discussing clinical data with fellow physicians
- Minimizing physician-hospital battles
- Creating a safe environment for learning
- Helping to build transparency and trust
Physician Champions Collaborative Listening
Observations:
EMR, and HIE are works in progress
ACO….the foundation has yet to be excavated..
The cart is definitely in front of the horse(s)
Monday, March 14, 2011
M.U. or A.C.O. Pick Your Poison
HIMSS 2011 has just adjourned, and the reviews are filled with prognosis and predictions.
by Neil Versel (Xerox)
M.U.
The healthcare world is waiting nervously for HHS to release its proposed ACO regulations. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius was on hand for a keynote address Wednesday morning, but gave no hint of when the regs might come. Instead, Sebelius and departing national health IT coordinator Dr. David Blumenthal mostly stuck to their general stump speeches, perhaps not wanting to stir up political controversy in this time of divided government.
In some ways, Blumenthal’s presence at HIMSS was notable for something he didn’t show up for. Deputy National Coordinator Dr. Farzad Mostashari, likely to be the interim coordinator when Blumenthal returns to Harvard in April, led the ONC town hall on Tuesday. Mostashari caused some seismic ripples through much of the vendor community on Monday by saying that ONC will be working with the National Institute for Standards and Technology and other organizations in the next six months to find ways to measure EHR usability, and that usability likely will be part of Stage 2 meaningful use, starting in 2013.
Farzad Mostashari, likely to be the interim coordinator when Blumenthal returns to Harvard in April, led the ONC town hall on Tuesday. Mostashari caused some seismic ripples through much of the vendor community on Monday by saying that ONC will be working with the National Institute for Standards and Technology and other organizations in the next six months to find ways to measure EHR usability, and that usability likely will be part of Stage 2 meaningful use, starting in 2013. (Nothing like putting the cart before the horse)..Stage I was obviously designed for CMS and insurers, so those who wisely wait for a better standard, such as usabiity wil not receive a large incentive, and be penalized for caution. We must adopt inferior hardware and software platforms by such and such a date or suffer the consequences of a reduced reimbursement and/or reduced incentives. As usual our government would race to an implementation for it’s own self –centered purposes, since the funding actually comes from taxpayer pockets.
A.C.O.
HIMSS 2011 was not all about meaningful use. “Meaningful use in some ways fell off the radar,” another CMIO said on the same bus ride. The new buzz—and source of anxiety—is about Accountable Care Organizations.
An eponym ranked right up there and as controversial as the PACA law ACO is a new name looking for an organization upon which to plant it’s banner.
Hospitals and physicians alike are frantic to filter through the impending changes in billing and reimbursement model. Who will bill.. hospitals,.. physicians, or a third organism which the hospital and physicians will create as a ‘holding entity? This looks like another level of bureaucracy which will compromise whatever savings HHS is proposing by a huge re-organization of the industry. Efficiency in health care seems to be a moving target….a bit to the right, and then a bit to the left.
Just as some of the visionary ideas such as HIE and EMR are beginning implementation, the bureaucrats add more ingredients to the mix, further congealing real progress.
Sherry Turkle, the Director of MIT’s Initiative on Technology and Self, has become deeply pessimistic about our digital future. In her controversial new book, Alone Together,Turkle argues that the development of emotionally sympathetic robots like Tamagotchis and Furbies means that the “robotic moment” has arrived for the human race.She elaborates. In several interviews on TechCrunch
Turkle is not optimistic about social media, robotics, nor the development of emotionally sympathetic robots. Please view the videos and read the TechCrunch interview then leave your comments here:
Friday, March 11, 2011
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
More Butterfly Effect
The Laws of Unintended Consequences, or Whose Money is it Anyway?
There are provisions in the health care bill which paradoxically, and perhaps predictably increase the cost of Rxes and add additional burdens to the doctor.
Patients are demanding doctors' orders for over-the-counter products because of a provision in the health-care overhaul that slipped past nearly everyone's radar. It says people who want a tax break to buy such items with what's known as flexible-spending accounts need to get a prescription first.
The result is that Americans are visiting their doctors before making a trip to the drugstore, hoping their physician will help them out by writing the prescription. The new requirements create not only an added burden for doctors, but also new complications for retailers and pharmacies.
"It drives up the cost of health care as opposed to reducing it," says Dr.Chung, who rejected much of a 10-item request from a mother of four that included pain relievers and children's cold medicine.
Some doctors, irked by the paperwork and worried about lawsuits, are balking at writing the new prescriptions. Pharmacists and retailers say the changes mean they have to apply a personalized label on some 15,000 different everyday products for customers paying with certain debit cards.
The Unintended Consequences of Hasty and Poorly Thought out Legislation
Retailers and pharmacies, meanwhile, say another aspect of the change caught them flat-footed. Many flexible-spending accounts come with a debit card, making it easy for consumers to draw down the money in the accounts when they shop at a pharmacy. But under the original IRS guidance, people couldn't use those cards for the prescribed over-the-counter medications.
An industry group representing Wal-Mart, CVS Caremark Corp., Visa Inc. and other large corporations warned that could temporarily halt use of the debit cards for any pharmacy purchase. The IRS eventually decided the cards could be used—as long as the pharmacist labels and processes the over-the-counter item exactly like a prescription.
That had another unintended effect. Thousands of over-the-counter products now must pass behind the pharmacist's counter when the customer pays with the special debit card.
Doctors are also concerned about malpractice lawsuits, since a prescription potentially puts them on the hook for any problems a patient suffers from over-the-counter drugs.
Some malpractice insurers are urging doctors not to write any prescription without seeing the patient in person, says Lawrence Smarr, president of the Physician Insurers Association of America, which represents malpractice insurance providers.
The over-the-counter provision isn't the only part of the health-care law that has defied expectations.
Health-policy experts predicted that new insurance pools for high-risk patients would attract so many expensive enrollees that funding would be quickly exhausted. In fact, enrollment is running at just 6% of expectations, partly because of high premiums.
A provision preventing insurers from denying coverage to children with pre-existing health conditions prompted insurers in dozens of states to stop selling child-only policies altogether.
And a piece of the law designed to centralize patient care by encouraging health-care providers to collaborate is running into antitrust concerns from regulators.
Much of the health law, which passed last year despite overwhelming opposition by Republicans, doesn't take effect until 2014. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has projected that an additional 32 million Americans will get insurance, and the law has already extended tax credits to small businesses for buying insurance and allowed many parents to keep their children on their health plan until their 26th birthday.
But opponents say it costs too much and gives the federal government too much control over health care.
As that larger battle plays out, the over-the-counter provision is emerging as a top target for change. Republicans in both the House and Senate have introduced legislation to repeal it and return to the old system. The largest chain drugstore lobbying group is backing the effort, arguing that the new rules are inefficient and limit access to the medicines.
Asked whether she would support such legislation, Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of Health and Human Services, said: "I'd take a look at it."
Tax breaks for over-the-counter drugs date to 2003, as popular drugs like the allergy medicine Claritin began switching to over-the-counter status. The Internal Revenue Service loosened the rules on flexible-spending accounts so consumers could use them to buy thousands of nonprescription medications. The tax-free dollars can also go for insurance co-payments, eyeglasses and other out-of-pocket health costs.
Critics say the accounts encourage overconsumption of medical services. Since consumers typically must forfeit unused funds by year's end, they often ended up scrambling in December to drain their funds by loading up on aspirin, antacid and the like.
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Dr Berwick’s Numbers are Almost In
In a report from Katherine Hobson of the Wall Street Journal, She describes,
“The road ahead looks so difficult that some Democrats are joining Republicans in calling for a new nominee, The New York Times reports. It’s a matter of math; 42 Republicans have already urged President Obama to pick someone else, and by voting accordingly, they could block confirmation, the paper says. A White House spokesman tells the NYT the nomination won’t be withdrawn and praised Berwick’s performance thus far.”
It seems there will be another protracted confrontation between congress with President Obama. Obama appears to be a one man show dedicated to his getting his way with some questionable tactics e
It is clear that Obama chose Berwick because of their intertwined motivation to re-distribute the wealth and the health of the nation.
The Times reports Berwick’s principal deputy, Marilyn Tavenner, would be more acceptable to Republicans and is a potential replacement.
Readers who wish to learn more about Don Berwick M.D may go link to several past Health Train Express Articles:
I agree with some of the utopian ideals that Dr Berwick espouses, however it is obvious that neither side has drilled down on the impact of true costs to patients, employers, or care providers The bureaucracy will be stultify everyone ...
Dr Price Tears into Don Berwick (CMS)..Feb 10, 2011…A live web video from the hearing on Health Reform Repeal Legislation. Web Video Live. image. Rep. Tim Price MD. You listen, you decide, but a must view for everyone.
Health Train Express: Foreign Perspective on US Health Economics Feb 25, 2011……Today we are faced with demagogues in health care, the Sebelius', the Berwick's, the health care foundations, and all those wannabees who are sabotaging health care with politically correct statements. They come, they go at the end of ...
Observations Hard to believe whoever was in charge of this let it slip through. Well intentioned but poorly implemented. The Health Care Blog also has a post today by Micihael Millenson. Thanks to him. I will write Czar Berwick about this one. ..
Which Planet am I on? ….Jan 21, 2011 .. running in the opposite direction from the US Health Reform. I wonder what Dr Berwick is thinking now? del.icio.us Tags: NHS,Andrew Lansley,UK Health system,Primary care trusts,acountable care.
Are Doctors lurking, or lurching?….Dec 30, 2010….Donald Berwick, explains, "Traditional medical ethics, based on the doctor-patient dyad must be reformulated...The primary function of regulation in health care, especially as it affects the quality of medical care, is to constrain ...
The IHI Open School…Dec 25, 2010…Mention the name 'Don Berwick' and some physicians have a gut-wrenching feeling about him. He is the focal point and lightening rod as head of CMS due to his statements about the American Health System. ...
A Good Guy or a Bad Guy?….Don Berwick is a controversial candidate for being the head of the Medicare (CMS) system. The name change several years ago from Medicare to CMS (Center for Medicare,Medicaid Services) was a subtle. beginning for the projected changes ….
Re-distribute the Wealth…Jul 09, 2010….Essentially Don Berwick has become the 'lap-dog' for the socialist agenda of Barak Obama. Dr. Berwick has been a respected member and head of many organizations that are held in high esteem by the government for advice.
Health Reform in the NHS vs.The US…Aug 24, 2010…The UKs NHS system is running away from itself as fast as Obama and Berwick are running toward an obsolete model. From the BBC News Online today,. image. Hospitals are to be set free from central control
Dec 05, 2010
Dec 05, 2010
Unfortunately Don Berwick, the present head of CMS totally ignores this feature of the NHS. The NHS system has not been self correcting due to it's massive bureaucracy and inertial guidance system. This is typical of government. ...
What tha !?…Jul 27, 2010…Seems like Don Berwick was preaching to the wrong choir several months ago when he addressed an audience in the UK. Today, The New York Times announced,. LONDON — Perhaps the only consistent thing about Britain's socialized health care ...
Monday, March 7, 2011
The Berwick Boondogle
This post is highly opinionated and biased, the opinions are solely those of the author.
Dr. Berwick, a respected academic pediatrician from Harvard and the President of the well known Institute of Medicine was appointed by President Barak Obama hastily without congressional confirmation hearings. Berwick, who undoubtedly is a smart physician, but naïve about politics,and one who has misread his national colleagues opinions on health care hails from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, where all intelligent life exists only within the confines of route 128 (the Boston Beltway). Those who live inside Route 128 knows what is best for all of medicine, and health in the United States. Harvard, the beacon of light in medicine and science seeds the country, and universities with professors, teachers and sends leaders in academic medicine and many other disciplines throughout the United States and the rest of the world.
Dr. Berwick fell on his sword with the following speech given at the NHS last year, just prior to his appointment by Obama.
Don Berwick MD speaks at the NHS
So it was a big surprise (to Obama) when Berwick received little support from the grass roots of medicine, who care for the electorate.
There was a rather humorous incident the other day at a National Journal event with Don Berwick, the man who President Obama hailed as being at the forefront of introducing “innovative technologies” into health care reform.
“Withdrawing Dr. Berwick’s nomination would be a positive first step in rebuilding the trust of the American people. The occupant of this important position, which affects the health care of so many Americans on a daily basis, requires an individual with the appropriate experience and management ability. Our seniors and those who rely on Medicaid deserve no less,” the Senators write.
While Dr. Berwick has been renominated for the position, as Head of CMS, for which he was a recess appointee last year, no hearings have been scheduled yet regarding his nomination.
Friday, March 4, 2011
Health Care EMR & The Cloud
Healthcare, EMR and the Cloud
The Health Train Express exits the tunnel of meaningful use into the cloud.
The future for digitization of health records is cloudy.
This next decade will see a transition from client-server to solutions based in the cloud. The cloud is the virtual space located on a powerful server at a distant location.
It will facilitate adoption of more robust EMR applications and eventually serve as the ultimate health information exchange.
Rather than having expensive hardware and software at your office, requiring expensive maintenance and upgrades the applications and data are hosted at facilities designed as large enterprise secure sites.
Security is no more an issue than that for any present applications, and in most cases, better.
Many physicians are uneasy with patient databases off site, and concerned with HIPAA regulations in their own offices. The burden for insuring security will be placed squarely upon vendors.
The likelihood of cloud computer solutions increasing for business and healthcare is increased as large enterprise hardware vendors such as Dell acquire ASAP software, Everdream (provider of SaaS software solutions and remote-service management), Network Storage Co., Exanet, Ocarina Networks,Boom (SaaS), Apple, and many others have invested in building or acquiring large data centers.
Hewlett Packard purchased EDS (Ross Perot) to form HP Enterprise Services, which in addition to large data centers has much experience in healthcare solutions for health plans, government health, and life sciences.A leader in healthcare solutions
HP is the largest provider of healthcare information technology (IT) services in the world,encompassing the health plan, provider, life sciences, and government healthcare segments. Their solutions bring together unmatched experience, proven capabilities, domain expertise and industry knowledge, strong applications know-how, and practical innovation.
In 2009 Apple acquired property in Maiden, NC and began to build out a 500,000 square foot 1 billion dollar data center.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDXSSi1qStA
The cloud is the last to arrive in the healthcare space and EMR in particular. Several years ago vendors began to offer ASP solutions which are similar to but less efficient that true cloud platforms.
Now clear weather in the EMR space will be replaced by clouds.
Other business spaces already use cloud solutions for many functions in CRM, Inventory, Process Management,
The functions, also known as SaaS (Software as a Service), are in operation and offered by Amazon, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and at the end of 2009 the largest ten companies in SaaS were: Tera, Netsuite,IBM,Joyent, VMware, Google, and Rackspace. And the winner is …..Amazon !
In 2010 Enomaly, GoGrid, and AT&T, and Microsoft Azure have emerged from the young additions to the cloud.
Competition in the cloud space involves the diversity of applications as well as response times. No one wants to sit and wait for a screen refresh while a patient sits in your examining room, or the receptionist and billers twiddle their thumbs (at your expense) waiting.
The basic robust hardware/software infrastructure is already present.
Health Train Predicts that it will take five years for this technology to evolve and mature. The overwhelming advantage of this computing power is affordability of advanced algorithms and solution analysis for diagnosis and treatment. EMR will approach the medical record with artificial intelligence .s It is green technology markedly reducing requirements for cooling, and energy for end users,
The feds, insurers, and CMS are doing the health system, doctors, patients, and ultimately the tax paying public a great disservice with pushing for meaningful use, premature incentives with unrealistic time frames that will cost us all in the long run.
For those us who have implemented a system, so be it. Wait five years, at which time your system will be obsolete, and you will be faced with a major upgrade expense………consider a switch to the cloud……And for the rest of us, hold off, wait and do not be precipitated investing into already dated technology. IT advisory panels have recommended that CMS modify stages II and III definitions for meaningful use.
The eHealth Initiative recently sent a comment letter to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT, expressing concern about the proposed timelines for Stage 2 of the meaningful use program, Health Data Management reports.
Under the 2009 federal economic stimulus package, health care providers who demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHRs can qualify for incentive payments through Medicare and Medicaid.
The letter argues that the regulatory timeline included in the proposed criteria for Stage 2 provides "an inadequate amount of time for eligible hospitals to follow an implementation and testing schedule," adding, "A rushed process could potentially affect patient care."
The group did not explicitly ask for ONC to delay the start of Stage 2, but instead asked federal officials to "address the issue of inconsistent timelines" for regulations and the start of Stage 2
Additional Recommendations
In its comment letter, the eHealth Initiative also called for greater focus on health information exchange in Stage 2 of the meaningful use program. According to the group, the proposed Stage 2 requirements continue to focus on EHRs and do not give health care providers enough flexibility to use health data exchange to demonstrate meaningful use.
In many cases users are already using cloud functionality, unknowingly with eRX prescribing via Surescripts either directly or via your EMR.
Thursday, March 3, 2011
International Health Day
The Health Train Express travels and becomes a global enterprise.
No, I am not going to talk about the World Health Organzation (WHO). This post is going to recognize respected and interested international Visitors on Health Train Express. I recently installed ‘Feedjit’, a tracking tool of visitors to THTE And here are where there are readers.
Amsterdam,Hyderabad,Moscow,Tordas,Pune,Maharashtra,Tarlac,Nairobi, Delhi,Bangaladore,Saskatoon,
Thanks for the visit !
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Participatory Medicine
There is a new eponym about to erupt in health care PM. which is short for Participatory Medicine.
Participatory medicine: A high-tech alliance with patients
Charles Smith M.D., who blogs at eDocBlog, tells a story,
Matthew Herper’s post about thalidomide treatment of Myeloma is a good example of how patients will contribute to medical knowledge in the future, and may form a cautionary tale for patients who get involved to this degree in formulating new treatment approaches.
I work with Bart Barlogie, MD, (quoted in the article as the physician who ran the first clinical trial of the use of thalidomide in treatment of Myeloma) who is an innovative clinician researcher who has extended the life of many patients with Myeloma with his treatment approaches. He is also treating my wife who was diagnosed three years ago with Waldenstrom's Macroglulinemia, a form of lymphoma that resembles Multiple Myeloma (she has responded very well to his treatment).
The fact that her husband pushed her physician to try a novel approach to try to save his life, and that it was tried (even though it didn’t work for him), is an example of what will happen increasingly in the “new world of
Participatory Medicine”.
He would undoubtedly be cheering with the knowledge that the treatment that helped him beat back his disease for over a decade was probably “discovered” by a patient who was practicing Participatory Medicine!
Participatory Medicine: Patients doing research, usually online, and taking the ideas into the medical arena. Get ready, it’s going to be a brand new world!
Dr Smith, I can’t disagree with your assessment, but this is not a new phenomenon, such as the new world order. It has been going on for decades as far as I know. I was exposed to this each day in my practice. PM is just a new eponym for an old process. I’m certain Dr. Smith already knew this, but gives it a new name to draw attention to this for patients.
What is different in 2011 is that doctors are much busier seeing larger numbers of patients, and face time is markedly reduced, so that patients must be encouraged and pro-active to ask questions that are directly focused on their own problem.
What is also different is the growing use of EMRs. In the past, physicians would adjust their examination (and history) on relevant answers or findings on the physical examination based on their knowledge base of information built on years of clinical experience. Much of the process was fast and unconscious, and based upon previous learning and experience, much as we all experience such as riding a bicycle.
The current generation of EMRs does not allow tree analysis of the history and examination, truncating the process into usable information. The physician or assistant is forced to enter much useless information.
What our current EMRs produce is an endless repetitive list of information, which may be more readable but is offset by the prodigious meaningless amount of data. Most of this information will never be read, again.
The amount of processing power would be awesome to develop the tree analysis to structure a meaningful history and physical examination,and. probably too expensive unless it was rendered in the ‘cloud’.
Technorati Tags: emr,participatory medicine
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)