HEALTH TRAIN EXPRESS
Mission: To promulgate health education across the internet:
Follow or subscribe to Health Train Express as well as Digital Health Space for all the updates for health policy, reform, public health issues. Health Train Express is published several times a week.Subscribe and receive an email alert each time it is published. Health Train Express has been published since 2006.
The freedoms to practice medicine...........................
It's that time again, the anniversary of the "birth" of our nation. The 4th of July means many things to many people. For our warriors away from home it memorializes what our country is all about. "FREEDOM"
When I was younger I did not appreciate fully how challenging it is to establish and maintain "FREEDOM' The seed must be planted in fertile ground, watered and fertiilzed. Neglecting the plant and not watering it will result in withering and death.
One of the best fertilizers for "FREEDOM" is the diversity, discourse, and strong disagreements among it's citizens. Just like the first law of thermodynamics, organizations tends to descend into chaos without adding more energy. 'FREEDOM' will always require energy to maintain.
And while our economy is suffering, "FREEDOM" remains strong. It however is endangered by the crisies, real or manufactured.
Governments may be induced to suspend "FREEDOM" in the interest of public safety, and disasters.
Our leaders must be attentive to this emperative and not lose focus dealing with the daily challenge of meeting health care needs, fixing economic markets, and sustaining productivity.
Our founding fathers were true geniuses, establishing a tri-partite government, with each body carrying equal weight in the equation. It is the duty of the congress to regulate and challenge the executive branch. The Judicial branch serves to analyze and apply law to certain conflicts with it's opinion(s).
The President is supposed to lead the people, but not the congress. Congress is supposed to have a mind of it's own.
Freedom and health care go hand in hand. It's always been a lightening rod for disagreement in the United States, when governments steps in.
Are our leaders who are sworn to defend the constitution and our borders violating their oaths for political purposes?
As we all enjoy our hamburger's hot dogs, ribs, chicken and other barbecue goodies, think of the marinade as the "freedom" we have the fortune to live in. Think of the ketchup as the blood shed to guarrantee our freedoms. Think of the mustard as the gold or riches of our freedoms.
Last week I was invited to join Hope Street Group 2.0 which is focused on economic opportunity for professionals and practitioners. It covers a variety of areas. One of them is health care.
Aaron Doty and Sarah Steinhofer enumerated the following: (Hope Street 2.0)
"It is possible to point to a number of barriers that limit the spread of innovation in primary care (see some examples below).
Examples of barriers to innovation in primary care
Variations across states in scope of practice regulations
Reimbursement rules and lower earnings overall limit the attractiveness of primary care specialties
Current training and practice in silos does not support team-based work
Malpractice insurance rules discourage part-time work, especially for retirees
Inadequate access/utilization of health IT – telemedicine, electronic communication, EHRs – restricts access in rural/underserved areas
Administrative burden of care coordination
Design of new payment models is complex
Payment models (such as pay-for-performance) may incentivize shedding of sickest patients, or penalize those providers with more chronic & complex patients
Lack of data analysis capacity
Barriers to the spread of particular models: Retail clinics – concern about fragmentation of care coordination, concern about loss of revenue by other providers, lack of shared electronic record with PCPs Accountable Care Organizations – limited number of demonstration projects – new and unproven payment mechanisms, lack of consistent specifications, antitrust: perceived risk of collusion in the guise of care coordination, loss of revenue from emergency presentations. Patient Centered Medical Homes – lack of clarity about essential features to ensure quality outcomes, sustainability of savings unproven – quality-funding link not built into the model, access to well-trained care coordinators.""
I also suggest these additional issues:
In order to address the problem, one has to evaluate and anlyze what has caused the dramatic shift from general practice to specialty care, issues as great as reimbursement are only one part of the challenge..
Most analysts enumerate the disparity between specialty care and primary care..in reimbursment, and more administrative issues in primary care
I added these additional issues and challenges:
Several factors have been at work over the past fifty years.
1.The urbanization of America has caused a flight of young and old to the urban areas to seek out 'culture', diversity,access to health care and economic opportunity . This has caused a well known phenomenon of an economic shift from small towns to larger metropolitan areas.
2. Our challenges in primary care have followed this trend.
3..Some of these problems involve the social and economic millieu in which highly educated professionals desire to work, live and recreate.
4. No one can challenge the fact that physicians are amongst the most highly educated members of society. This is not just a technical skill, but by exposure to multicultural diversity, general fund of medical and social, political knowledge. Physicians do want to serve, however are very reluctant to place their families in areas that do not offer the best education or cultural opportunities.
4a.. Spouses generally drive where the physician choses to live in the long run. To do otherwise usually ends up in divorce.
5. Physician recruiting from rural and underserved areas is fraught with challenges, to attract bright inquisitve p eople who may be challenged by underachieving schools and other social and family barriers,both economic and other. Many of these young potential physicians see education as a road out of their community, for many good reasons.It would be interesting to evaluate what percentage of physicians do return to their home to practice in their community in which they grew up.
6. Programs developed with economic incentives such as loan
forgiveness with contractual obligations provide some basis for supplying these areas, however what percentage of recipients remain when their time is up?
7..Although not as frequent in today's educational structure were those physicians who would practice general medicine for several years and then specialize. The elimination of the free standing internship with a possible break to work and perhaps look at a long term view of general practice has virtually destroyed this mechanism to produce general physicians
8. The well meaning elevation of family practice to a recognized specialty created the necessity to become board certified in family practice to be credentialled at hospitals and also insurance companies.Insurance companies are now 'driving this boat", Because specialty care pays so much better, one asks the question, why spend two to three years becoming eligible for a family practice credential, why not spend the same amount of time training to become 'specialty trained."
Chris Thorman in an article on CCHIT and HITECH elaborates on the 'new issues' posed by HITECH.
For nearly four years, the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) has been the lone entity recognized by the federal government to certify electronic health record systems. Since being named a recognized certifying body by Health and Human Services (HHS) in 2006, CCHIT has awarded certifications to nearly 200 EHR software products based on CCHIT’s standards of functionality, interoperability, usability and security.
However, CCHIT’s role in the EHR market is changing. The Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT (ONC) and the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced in early March 2010 that they would name more than one organization to certify EHR software, countering previous claims that CCHIT would become the sole certifying body.
This points out the difficulties of having federal intrusion into the daily working of medical care and technology. He who signs the checks makes the rules. Not only is that a factor, but the rules change. Mandates are made and only a small percentage of these come to pass. Pilot studies and demonstration projects are planned, implemented, and studied. In a recent article
"Just how important are all these pilots and demos? Harvard’s David Cutler, who served as a key advisor to the Obama administration in developing the reform strategy, clearly believes they are vital. Writing in the June Health Affairs, he stresses the need for rapid implementation of the pilots and demonstrations in order to help achieve eventual savings of “enormous amounts of money while simultaneously improving the quality of care..............The simple answer is that few providers will participate in a pilot or demonstration if it’s likely to cause their income to drop. As a result, CMS must attract “volunteers” with generous promises of shared savings or payments for additional services –essentially, bribes to compensate for lost revenue and the time-consuming process of dealing with CMS bureaucracy. So far, the bribes have outweighed the savings in almost every case. Worse still, and often overlooked in evaluations of pilots, participating providers are likely to be those most able to achieve savings—the “good guys,” rather than the typical—with resultant optimistic skewing of the results........................Results suggest that some of these programs may have modest effects on the quality of care and mixed impacts on Medicare costs, with most programs costing Medicare more than would have been spent had they not been implemented….
In almost all cases, the cost to Medicare of the intervention exceeded the savings generated by reduced use of inpatient hospitalizations and other medical services.”
Roger Collier was formerly CEO of a national health care consulting firm. His experience includes the design and implementation of innovative health care programs for HMOs, health insurers, and state and federal agencies. He is editor of Health Care REFORM UPDATE [reformupdate.blogspot.com]
Chris Thorman came to Software Advice after working in politics and with international non-profit organizations. He's originally from Kansas City and has been blogging about the Chiefs at ArrowheadPride.com since 2006. His articles have been mentioned in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Business Week, Sports Illustrated, ESPN and NFL.com. Currently, Chris resides in Austin, TX, with his wife Nichole and dog Winston.
No doubt, health information technology is the "Penicillin" for the business and record keeping digital age.
Some of us seem to be 'allergic' to the technology, so they keep an ampule of epinephrine in the form of pens and pencils in their pockets to prevent anaphylaxis.
HIT, EMR, HIE are truly the amazing outgrowth of silicone wafers, printed circuit boards, integrated circuits, mosfets, microprocessors, RAM, ROM,hard drives, solid state drives, LCDs, LEDs, engineers, software, and cheap labor in Asia.
We have gone through several decades of explosive technology in diagnostics and therapeutics. Some of the latest 'gadgets" are outlined below,
A new microfluidic device from the University of Southampton, called single-cell impedance cytometer, is being reported in Lab on a Chip. The technology promises to perform a white blood cell differential count in a tiny package from a puny sample.
FIRE YOUR OPHTHALMOLOGIST or buy an eyePhone
Researchers at MIT have developed a method of using a basic cellphone coupled with a cheap and simple plastic device clipped onto the screen to estimate refractive errors and focal range of eyes.
Because of its simplicity, and the fact that soon just about everyone will have access to a mobile phone, eye exams may become available to the whole world at little to no cost.
Previous neuroprothesis worked through electric signals that triggered already existing nerves to release neurotransmitters like dopamine. However, the electric signals didn't discriminate between different types of nerve cells, which greatly reduced the fidelity and usefulness of the devices.
This new device utilizes the same neurotransmitters that natural nerves use. That allows the robotic nerve to target specific neural pathways, without the random side effects of electronic neural stimulation.
President Obama with Erskine Bowles, left, and Alan K. Simpson, co-chairmen of the commission on debt reform, before speaking in the Rose Garden on Tuesday.
Will there be real health reform?? Why is that man on the left smirking? What is the man on the right saying?? How serious is this? Well here are the facts, based upon Wikipedia regarding Alan K. Simpson;
"The June 7, 1994, edition of the now-defunct supermarket tabloid Weekly World News reported that 12 U.S. Senators were aliens from other planets, including Simpson. The Associated Press ran a follow-up piece which confirmed the tongue-in-cheek participation of Senate offices in the story. Then-Senator Simpson's spokesman Charles Pelkey, when asked about Simpson's galactic origins, told the AP: "We've got only one thing to say: Klaatu barada nikto."[5]
The International Monetary Fund is warning that the U.S. national debt will exceed 100% of GDP within the next five years, and economists both here and abroad are expressing alarm. The debt problem is mainly an entitlements problem and the entitlements problem is mainly a health care problem. How serious is it?
Here’s the bottom line: Our entitlement problems all stem from the fact that these programs are run like Bernie Madoff chain letters. Since payroll tax revenues are spent rather than invested, workers are accumulating benefits that are not paid for. Implicitly, we are creating huge obligations for generations not yet born — people who never agreed to be part of the scheme and who will surely be worse off if they participate.
President Obama has appointed a commission on the federal debt (National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform), mainly focused on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. To signal his seriousness about this venture, the President has even gone so far as to put the newly passed health reform bill on the negotiating table — although the ink on the new law is barely dry.
Health Reform? 2000 pages of wet ink which is all a "MAYBE"
One of my colleagues, Alan Carlson MD, and ophthalmologist at Duke University offered some humor for physicians, ophthalmologists and othershere.
He also mentioned on a post on one of our specialty listserv, the fact that he was surprised to see how much political commentary appeared on this 'scientific forum'.
I thought I would post here, his modifications of procedure to satisfy the requirements of health reform. At the end I have added a few of my own quips.
During the 2008 pre-ARVO Advanced Surface Ablation meeting in Ft. Lauderdale, I was stimulated by Dr. Dan Durrie’s suggestion that LASIK is perhaps an outdated term. Noting that our patients deserve and expect an updated term, one that reflects several recent surgical advances, he ultimately proposed the term SBK, or sub-Bowman’s keratomileusis, rather than simply “thin flap LASIK.”
I confess that my first thought was that this new name had more surgeon appeal and less consumer attraction. Along with SBK, a number of other terms designed to catch our interest as well as that of our patients include: “Custom LASIK,” “iLASIK,” and “EYE-Q LASIK,” among others. New terms as descriptors should impart a quality or aspect of new information to the consumer.
• Obama LASIK begins by prescribing Restasis preop and explaining to the patient that this is part of their new tear stimulus package. During the actual procedure, the surgeon making the flap prefers looking at the laser monitor, which also serves as a high-definition teleprompter, rather than looking through the microscope oculars.
• Palin LASIK stipulates that any surgical procedure not fully approved by the FDA will no longer be called “off-label.” Instead, this procedure will be designated on the consent form as “going rogue.”
• Bush LASIK occurs when the surgeon is willing to take on the tougher cases, even without all of the data, but leaves open what defines a “successful” end result, indications for enhancement, and a strategy that defines completion.
• Cheney LASIK. This technique emphasizes intense irrigation under the flap clearing the interface of all debris in a technique known as “saline boarding.”
• Hillary LASIK recognizes that co-managed patient care extends beyond the surgeon and the optometrist. Rather, it takes an entire postoperative team, or village, to care for the patient.
• Pelosi LASIK. is quite cumbersome, with a 1,900-page brochure and consent form, but also recognizes that all future advances in the field of refractive surgery can only occur when wealthier patients start paying their fair share.
• Gore LASIK stresses that good, consistent surgical outcomes can only occur if the surgeon monitors temperature, humidity and environmental aspects surrounding the laser. Scientific evidence suggests that enhancement rates are increasing throughout the country resulting from a general warming trend in excimer laser rooms.
• The Rev. Jesse Jackson LASIK involves communication during the surgical procedure. Instead of the common reassurances of “perfect” and reminder to look at the flashing light, the surgeon intones short phrases that have a distinctive cadence and rhyming delivery, such as: “… I think it is basic, you’ll benefit from LASIK. Look at the light, and all will be right.”
We must not forget our commentators as well.
• Keith Olbermann LASIK addresses all negative outcomes and patient complaints by placing the blame on the patient’s eye-care provider for the previous eight years.
• Bill O’Reilly LASIK entails instructing the patient during surgery to avoid being cantankerous rather than asking him to look at the flashing light.
• Sean Hannity LASIK pronounces all satisfied LASIK patients as great Americans.
• Rush Limbaugh LASIK reminds all satisfied LASIK patients that the surgeon’s special talents are on loan from God.
• Lou Dobbs LASIK is generally limited to enhancements, but challenges the location and authenticity of the original LASIK procedure.
Corneal
Aberration
Reduction
Laser
Surgery for
Optical
Neutrality
My own thoughts
Bill O'Reilly Lasik offers the 'No Spin Laser". With this technique the autotracker is disengaged and the flying spot software is also disengaged. Pinhead or Patriot enhancements are also available. The laser has been certified as 'fair and balanced'
Oprah Winfrey Lasik offers the best seller list as a benefit and value added feature.
Rush Limbaugh Lasik offers large amounts of pain management along with a copy of his book, "See, I told you So".
Governor Mark Sanford Lasik offers a free trip to Argentina for both the procedure and post operative visits. An option is a free escort service.
General McCrystal Lasik offers a free trip to the United States with a refundable return ticket to Afghanistan (cannot be transferred). The procedure is pre-approved and in accordance with all DOD regulations, and is free of charge.
utilizes a mixture of homeopathic oil mixed with saline and a pinch of pelican feathers, oysters and shrimp, placed on the cornea at the conclusion of the procedure. The procedure also comes with a free grant application for financial aid.
Dr. Carlson's commentary regarding the level of political commentary is well taken. Doctors are 'mad as hell' and aren't going to take it anymore.....
It seems we will only do things with monetary rewards
Wander off to this website, dedicated to spending the tax payers money for the purpose of installing and using electronic health records in provider offices. The rule making is only 169 pages long. The devil is in the details.
Another factor in the equation is that EHRs can be considered to be medical devices, or even 'biomedical equipment". I think most of you can see where this is headed. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)regulates medical devices as well as pharmaceuticals.
Consider this: Biomedical equipment must be annually inspected and certified by the appropriate biomedical engineer to be used for patient care. Devices usually are subject to a 'clinical trial' or reports, or an IDE (Investigative Device Exemption)
EMRs are intimately intertwined with patient care, and involve patient safety issues.
Where the feds are involved expect to see more bureaucracy, regulation and oversight. The feds are just not going to incentivize without regulation. Build in more overhead for regulation.
The past several months reveal how disconnected the plan for health care reform has evolved. There was little transparency regarding the evolution of the bill, except for political posturing. The present administration has no experience in business leadership, nor basic economic theory.
The fact that the flawed SGR formula, hastily conceived in the early 1990s, was not addressed in the health reform bill attests to the simple fact that cost is a major factor in the legislation. Universal care was never a top priority except to assuage the proletariat. SGR was and is held out as a bargaining chip and as a diversion for most physicians.
The effects of the SGR impact very severely on ophthalmologists, urologists, geriatricians, some internists and somewhat on cardiologists and pulmonologists. These practices serve a large medicare population, and the SGR impact as presently structured or not eliminated will be devastating.
Primary care physicians can select to minimize medicare or eliminate it all together from their business model, with much less impact on their practices.
Thus, some specialists will have little choice but to either quit entirely, or fire half their staff, and reduce the quality and accessiblity of their practices to senior citizens. These practices will ill afford to acquire new technology. The physical structures of medicine will decline, poor maintenance, bare floors, and peeling paint.
The past several months have been a Yo yo for physicians with hope for resolution of the SGR fiasco, and then dashed as we are used as a political football.