Information provided by Health Train Express and Digital Health Space is informational only. We do not endorse specific solutions. Inclusions are provided as reference only. Readers should consult with their own consultants for further details.

Sunday, March 29, 2015

Doctors Needing Assistance Transferring from Fee for Service to Quality of Care Reimbursement

Diagnostic Accuracy & Patient Engagement
Health Care IT and HCSM
      Featured from
        Best Doctors®  
      ribbon left shadow
      ribbon right shadow
        Best Doctors in the Financial Services Industry
      The Rising Health Care Costs

      Beware the Quickie Second Opinion

      Doctors face tremendous hurdles attempting to convert a volume based, procedural fee system to the        proposed method of quality and outcome based reimbursement.  Physicians and consultants alike have long      recognized the inflationary component of the old fee for service methods.  What is not apparent in the            new proposal is that it does not discard billing for procedures, but adds on a new algorithm which                  modifies the fee based upon other measures, currently in development.  Much of the algorithm is still in          development. The calculus depends upon big data analytics measuring outcomes and some vague          measures of quality

      Some have been proposed, such as hospital readmission rates, length of stay measures and others. CMS' meaningful use criteria will play a role as a built in component of certified electronic health records.  Some of these tools will not be available until 2018.  The initial metrics proposed for healthcare are new and arbitrary, and have not  yet been proven scientifically.  There are agencies such as AHRQ who have formulated guidelines, long before changes in reimbursement methodology were proposed.  Quaity issues must be a thing unto itself, unbound from payment methodology. Basing payment on quality of care remains a new algorithm.


      No comments: