Information provided by Health Train Express and Digital Health Space is informational only. We do not endorse specific solutions. Inclusions are provided as reference only. Readers should consult with their own consultants for further details.

Sunday, July 15, 2012

Telehealth or Telehell ?

It is touted that telehealth, video conferencing, telemedicine and mobile health applications will assist in reducing the cost of medical visits.  However, CMS has thus far not addressed reimbursed issues which is a major deterrent.  At first glance this may be true, however nothing is that simple and technology and regulations always alter the equation.

TeleMedicine encompasses many functions

Remote monitoring

Physician-patient video conferencing, email or chat

Physician-physician consultation ie,



Video documentation:

Hospital internal conferencing


Because of recent intense interest I did some research on this issue and found many states are outlining the requirements for telemedicine.

Health Providers have no difficulty proposing cost effective uses for tele medicine. The issues are that regulations and fear that privacy would be breached. Thus far I have not seen any rules regarding  patient and provider waiving HIPAA rights.  Does anyone know anything about waiving HIPAA? Leave a comment or tweet me @glevin1

California has issued guidelines for telemedicine on their California Board of Medicine online website.

Recently, the Medical Board received an inquiry regarding informed consent and whose obligation it was to obtain the necessary consent from the patient who would be undergoing the medical procedure.  Specifically, the question was whether physicians could delegate this task to another licensed health care provider or other personnel under their supervision.  While the Board could find no statutory or regulatory bar to this proposed process, the Board suggests that public policy is best served when the physician performing the procedure secures the consent from the pa tient.  In this manner, if the patient has questions or concerns, the physician is in the best position to address those matters.  The following is provided as a reminder of the legal requirements when practicing medicine via telehealth: Telehealth (previously called telemedicine) is seen as a tool in medical practice, not a separate form of medicine.  There are no legal prohibitions to using technology in the practice of medicine, as long as the practice is done by a California licensed physician.  Telehealth is not a telephone conversation, e-mail/ instant messaging conversation, or fax; it typically involves the application of videoconferencing or store- and-forward technology to provide or support health care delivery.

Business and Professions Code §2290.5 (b) states: “Prior to the delivery of health care via telehealth, the health care provider at the originating site shall verbally inform the patient that telehealth may be used and obtain verbal consent from the patient for this use.  The verbal consent shall be documented in the patient’s medical record.” This is important:  Please note that the standard of care is the same whether the pa- ent is seen in- person, through telehealth, or other methods of electronically enabled health care.  The Medical Practice Act, including informed consent laws, applies in every area of medicine and in every practice setting and circumstance.  California laws pertaining to the use of telehealth should not be construed to alter the scope of practice of any health care provider or authorize the delivery of health care services in a setting, or in a manner, not otherwise authorized by law.  Physicians need not reside in California, as long as they have a valid, current California license.

Many individual States are preparing or already have issued guidelines and/or regulations regarding Telehealth and Telemedicine.

Provided here are sources of information for those considering adding telemedicine to your  practice.

New CMS Rule on Telemedicine Credentialing and Privileging

Federal Spotlight on VA's SCAN-ECHO

Some perils of telemedicine

New York Statement on Telemedicine

State Reimbursement Policy appears to be addressed in New York


HHS reports progress on telehealth regulations

Regulations for tele-medicine are developing very rapidly and are in a state of flux.  Those considering tele-health in their  practice are advised to review current law and regulations from their state licensing authority. Most articles are dated, and incomplete.



Nick Jordan said...

What is telehealth? I have heard this term getting more usage in the context of healthcare reform.?
I'm just learning about telehealth for my hospital and would like to know more about what it entails and how it is beneficial.
What is lasik

Browne thomas said...

MD247 explains that it believes in the potential life altering outcome its 24/7 telemedicine program will have in both rural and urban frontiers.
talk to a doctor

Browne thomas said...

If someone does not have insurance due to expense or pre-existing conditions, the MD247 24 Hour telephonic physicians network brings affordability to healthcare. Even if a patient does have insurance, the cost for MD247 and the expense associated with the telephonic physician’s network is typically less than most co-pays insurance requires.

talk to a doctor